Abstract
Advances in information and digital technology have made it possible for anyone, anywhere with access to a computer to download millions of published scientific papers, creating the opportunity for a virtual public library of science. For too long, barriers to accessing that information have denied researchers, educators, consumers, and citizens the opportunity to benefit from this growing body of knowledge. The Public Library of Science became an “open access” publisher to remove those barriers by ensuring free and unrestricted access to the scientific and medical literature. PLoS also sought to change the very definition of “the scientific community” by providing the general public with the educational resources to better understand technical scientific papers and by creating Web-based tools that invite the general public to join discussions and debates surrounding the scientific literature. Such tools are especially important in an environment where scientists feel pressure to “do science by press release,” exaggerating the implications of study results to gain publicity and status. Editors at PLoS take pains to ensure that press releases describe the principal findings of published results without sensationalizing the implications of the work, hoping to prevent the sensationalized news stories that distort not only the significance of the findings at hand but the very nature of scientific progress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
PLoS allows free, unrestricted access and use of all content published in PLoS journals by using the Creative Commons Attribution License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/.
- 2.
PLoS Core Principles, http://www.plos.org/about/what-is-plos/core-principles/.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
Research in Context, http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/.
- 11.
Since PLoS launched Article-Level Metrics in March 2009, several different groups and individuals have independently analyzed various aspects of the dataset. Here is a sample of these efforts: http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/.
- 12.
Guidelines for Notes, Comments, and Corrections, http://www.plosbiology.org/static/comment Guidelines. action.
- 13.
Future releases of the platform may automate this function and/or provide data via an application program interface.
References
Bernstein, P., B. Cohen, C. MacCallum, et al. (2003). PLoS Biology – We’re open. PLoS Biology, 1(1), e34. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.000003.pbio.0000034.
Brown, P. O., M. B. Eisen, and H. E. Varmus (2003). Why PLoS became a publisher. PLoS Biology, 1(1), e36. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000036.
Franzen, J. L., P. D. Gingerich, J. Habersetzer, et al. (2009). Complete primate skeleton from the middle Eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and paleobiology. PLoS One, 4(5), e5723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005723.
Joseph, H. D. (2008). Testimony on behalf of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) alliance for taxpayer access association of research libraries before the subcommittee on courts, the internet, and intellectual property committee on the judiciary regarding H.R 6845, The fair copyright in research works act. http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/Joseph080911.pdf (last accessed on August 19, 2010).
Leake, J. and J. Harlow (2009). Origin of the specious – Times Online. London: The Sunday Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece (last accessed on August 19, 2010).
Neylon, C. and S. Wu (2009). Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS Biology, 7(11), e1000242. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242.
Rowe, S. B. (2000). Food for thought: An in-depth look at how the media report. nutrition, food safety, and health. AMWA Journal, 15(4), 5–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gross, L. (2012). Practitioner’s Perspective: Science as a Public Resource: Rules of Engagement. In: Rödder, S., Franzen, M., Weingart, P. (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection –Public Communication and its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2084-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2085-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)