Skip to main content

Constituting Digital Tools and Materials as Classroom Resources: The Example of Dynamic Geometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Text to 'Lived' Resources

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 7))

Abstract

This chapter examines the appropriation of digital resources into the mainstream practice of secondary-school mathematics teaching, taking the particular example of dynamic geometry to illustrate this process. It highlights some crucial but often overlooked facets of the changes in teaching practice and teacher knowledge that accompany the constitution of digital tools and materials as classroom resources. First, the chapter demonstrates the interpretative flexibility surrounding a resource and the way in which wider educational orientations influence conceptions of its use. It does so by showing how such conceptions of dynamic geometry have shifted between pioneering advocates and mainstream adopters; and how these conceptions vary across such adopters according to their wider approaches to teaching mathematics. Second, the chapter outlines a conceptual framework intended to make visible and analysable the way in which certain structuring features shape the incorporation of new technologies into classroom practice. This conceptual framework is then used to examine the case of a teacher leading what – for him – is an innovative lesson involving dynamic geometry, and specifically to identify how his professional knowledge is being adapted and extended. This shows how the effective integration of new technologies into everyday teaching depends on a more fundamental and wide-ranging adaptation and extension of teachers’ professional knowledge than has generally been appreciated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abboud-Blanchard, M., Cazes, C., & Vandebrouck, F. (2007). Teachers’ activity in exercises-based lessons. Some case studies. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1826–1836). Larnaca, Cyprus: CERME-5. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME5b/WG9.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Amarel, M. (1983). Classrooms and computers as instructional settings. Theory into Practice, 22, 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik [now known as ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education], 34(3), 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assude, T. (2005). Time management in the work economy of a class. A case study: Integration of Cabri in primary school mathematics teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is –or might be– the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8 & 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Towards technology integration in schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H., Ravitz, J., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers, teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 National Survey Report #3. Centre for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. California: University of California Irvine. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/FINDINGS/.../REPORT_3_PDF_REV.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno-Ravel, L., & Gueudet, G. (2007). Online resources in mathematics: Teachers’ genesis of use. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1369–1378). Larnaca, Cyprus: CERME-5. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME5b/WG9.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. B., & Anderson, L. W. (1987). The activity structure of lesson segments. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. B., & Lash, A. A. (1986). A comparison of activity structures during basic skills and problem-solving instruction in seventh-grade mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, D., & Yerushalmy, M. (1998). Charting a course for secondary geometry. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), New directions in the teaching and learning of geometry. (pp. 67–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisan, C., Lerman, S., & Winbourne, P. (2007). Mathematics and ICT: A framework for conceptualising secondary school teachers’ classroom practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C., Foxman, D., & Küchemann, D. (2001). A comparative study of geometry curricula. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J., & Rose, C. B. (2006). Finding space for technology: Pedagogical observations on the organization of computers in school environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(1). Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/59/56

  • Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers’ design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-Geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagrange, J.-B. (2008). ‘Ordinary’ teachers using technology: Concerns, theoretical approaches, case studies. Regular lecture at ICME-11. Abstract accessed on 31, January, 2011, at http://icme11.org/node/1441

  • Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 146–168). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Putnam T., Stein, M. K., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. Advances in Research in Teaching, 2, 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2006). Interactive whiteboard evaluation for the Secondary National Strategy: Developing the use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics: Final report. Keele: Keele University. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/96272

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, J. (2004). Teachers’ activities in technology-based mathematics lessons. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. (1990). Carry on SMILEing. Micromath, 6(3), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, J. (2002). Implications of using dynamic geometry technology for teaching and learning. In M. Saraiv, J. Matos, & I. Coelho (Eds.), Ensino e Aprendizagem de Geometria. Lisbon, Portugal: SPCE. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from http://www.spce.org.pt/sem/JO.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2002). Instrumenting mathematical activity: Reflections on key studies of the educational use of computer algebra systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2009). Towards a naturalistic conceptualisation of technology integration in classroom practice: The example of school mathematics. Education & Didactique, 3(1), 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2010). Constituer les outils et les supports numériques en ressources pour la classe. In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives, le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 183–199). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes/Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., Deaney, R., & Hennessy, S. (2009). Using graphing software to teach about algebraic forms: A study of technology-supported practice in secondary-school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2002). A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 47–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005). Incorporating Internet resources into classroom practice: Pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers. Computers and Education, 44(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers and Education, 51(1), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scher, D. (2000). Lifting the curtain: The evolution of the Geometer’s Sketchpad. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., Angeles, J., et al. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000102.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouche, L. (2005). Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (pp. 197–230). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of information and communications technologies. Research Policy, 25(6), 856–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, A., & McGhee, R. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico County public schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved 31, January, 2011, from ubiqcomputing.org/FinalReport.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Particular thanks are due to the teacher colleague featured in the case study; to Rosemary Deaney who carried out the fieldwork for it; and to the UK Economic and Social Research Council which funded the associated research project. This chapter draws on and develops ideas and material from two earlier publications (Ruthven, 2009, 2010). These publications drew, in turn, on papers discussed at the CERME conferences in 2007 and 2009, in the RME and TACTL SIGs at the AERA conference in 2009, and at the CAL conference in 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Ruthven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruthven, K. (2011). Constituting Digital Tools and Materials as Classroom Resources: The Example of Dynamic Geometry. In: Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Trouche, L. (eds) From Text to 'Lived' Resources. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics