Abstract
Nanotechnology has become one of the fastest-growing emerging technologies in the United States. President Bill Clinton established the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) to increase federal investment in nanotechnology research and development in 2001. In 2003, the U S Congress enacted the twenty-first Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act to evaluate and promote federal nanotechnology research, development, and other activities. This research and development in nanotechnology has led to the advancement of nanotechnology applications and products. For example, consumers can find over 1,000 nanotechnology applications on the market, ranging from tennis rackets to skin care products (Scheufele and Dudo 2010). The social penetration of nanotechnology has raised concerns as an important social issue associated with its potential benefits and risks (Scheufele and Lewenstein 2005). News media have been covering nanotechnology issues for decades, helping to shape how the public understand and perceive the new technology, and whether they support the technology or not (Scheufele and Lewenstein 2005; Weaver et al. 2009).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bainbridge, W.S. 2002. Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 4(6): 561–570.
Barnard, A.S. 2009. How can ab initio simulations address risks in nanotech? Nature Nanotechnology 4(6): 332–335.
Brossard, D., and M.C. Nisbet. 2006. Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19: 24–52.
Brossard, D., D.A. Scheufele, E. Kim, and B.V. Lewenstein. 2008. Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 546–558.
Cobb, M., and J. Macoubrie. 2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits, and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6: 395–405.
Currall, S.C. 2009. Nanotechnology and society: New insights into public perceptions. Nature Nanotechnology 4: 79–80.
Downs, A. 1972. Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle. The Public Interest 28: 38–50.
Dudo, A., S. Dunwoody, and D.A. Scheufele. 2009. The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in media coverage of nanotechnology. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
Dunwoody, S. 1980. The science writing inner club: A communications link between science and the lay public. Science, Technology, and Human Values 5: 14–22.
Friedman, S.M., and B.P. Egolf. 2005. Nanotechnology risks and the media. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 24(4): 5–11.
Gaskell, G., T. Ten Eyck, J. Jackson, and G. Veltri. 2005. Imagining nanotechnology: Cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Understanding of Science 14(1): 81–90.
Hoet, P.H.M., I. Brüske-Hohlfeld, and O.V. Salata. 2004. Nanoparticles-known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2(1): 12. doi:10.1186/1477-3155-2-12.
Horrigan, J. 2006. The internet as a resource for news and information about science. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Internet-as-a-Resource-for-News-andInformation-about-Science.aspx. Accessed 21 June 2010.
Keefer, E.W., B.R. Botterman, M.I. Romero, A.F. Rossi, and G.W. Gross. 2008. Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings. Nature Nanotechnology 3(7): 434–439.
Kuzma, J. 2007. Moving forward responsibly: Oversight for the nanotechnology-biology interface. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9(1): 165–182.
Mooney, C. 2008. The science writer’s lament. Scienceprogress.com. http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/10/the-science-writers-lament/. Accessed 24 June 2010.
Mooney, C. 2010. Do scientists understand the public? Cambridge: American Academies of Arts and Sciences.
Nisbet, M.C., and B.V. Lewenstein. 2002. Biotechnology and the American public: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23: 359–384.
Parpura, V. 2008. Instrumentation: Carbon nanotubes on the brain. Nature Nanotechnology 3(7): 384–385.
Riffe, D., S. Lacy, and F.G. Fico. 2005. Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research, 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Roco, M.C., and W.S. Bainbridge (eds.). 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scheufele, D.A. 2006. Messages and heuristics: How audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies. In Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action, ed. J. Turney, 20–5. London: The Wellcome Trust.
Scheufele, D.A., and A. Dudo. 2010. Emerging agendas at the intersection of political and science communication: The case of nanotechnology. In Communication yearbook 34, ed. C.T. Salmon, 143–167. New York: Routledge.
Scheufele, D.A., and B.V. Lewenstein. 2005. The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7(6): 659–667.
Scheufele, D.A., E.A. Corley, T.-J. Shih, K.E. Dalrymple, and S.S. Ho. 2009. Religious beliefs and public attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the US. Nature Nanotechnology 4(2): 91–94.
Silva, G.A. 2004. Introduction to nanotechnology and its applications to medicine. Surgical Neurology 61(3): 216–220.
Silva, G.A. 2006a. Neuroscience nanotechnology: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 65–74.
Silva, G.A. 2006b. Nanomedicine: Seeing the benefits of ceria. Nature Nanotechnology 1(2): 92–94.
Stephens, L.F. 2005. News narratives about nano SandT in major US and non-US newspapers. Science Communication 27(2): 175–199.
The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2008. The state of the news media: An annual report on American journalism. http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2008/index.php. Accessed 24 June 2010.
Weaver, D.A., E. Lively, and B. Bimber. 2009. Searching for a frame: News media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation. Science Communication 31(2): 139–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Appendix 1 Newspaper Sources with Content About Nanotechnology Included in the Sample
Medium | Large circulation a | Medium circulation | Small circulation |
---|---|---|---|
Newspaper b | The New York Times | The Plain Dealer (Cleveland) | The Augusta |
Washington Post | Milwaukee Journal | Chronicle | |
Houston Chronicle | Sentinel | Santa Fe New Mexican | |
The Boston Globe | The Seattle Times | Bangor Daily News | |
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution | St. Louis Post-Dispatch | Lewiston Morning Tribune | |
USA Today | St. Petersburg Times | The Herald (Rock Hill) | |
Star Tribune (Minneapolis) | The Sacramento Bee | Star-News | |
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | Wyoming Tribune-Eagle |
1.2 Appendix 2 Boolean Term Used to Search the LexisNexis Academic Database for News Coverage of Nanotechnology
Atleast3(nanotech!) OR nanosci! OR nanoscal! OR nanocrystal* OR nanotube*OR nanomat! OR (nanometer* NOT W/15 light or laser or wavelength or UV) OR nanodot* OR nanomed! OR nanopart! OR nanowir! OR nanoeng! OR nanocomp! OR nanoelectric! OR nanoelectronic! OR nanobot* OR nanomachine* OR fullerene* OR buckminsterfullerene* OR fullerite* OR buckyball* OR buckypaper* OR buckytube* OR molecular assembl! OR molecular manufactur! OR micromachine* OR quantum dot* OR quantum wire* OR quantum well* OR sub micron OR (individual atom* w/5 manipulate or move or build) OR (scanning w/3 microscope*) OR (tunneling w/3 microscope*) AND NOT nanosecond* AND NOT apple AND NOT iPod AND NOT mp3 AND NOT digest AND NOT news w/2 brief* AND NOT business w/2 brief* AND NOT news summary
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choi, DH., Dudo, A., Scheufele, D.A. (2013). U.S. News Coverage of Neuroscience Nanotechnology: How U.S. Newspapers Have Covered Neuroscience Nanotechnology During the Last Decade. In: Hays, S., Robert, J., Miller, C., Bennett, I. (eds) Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1786-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1787-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)