Abstract
There is a rising concern among natural resource scientists and managers about decline of the many plant and animal species associated with early successional habitats. There is no concise definition of early successional habitats. However, all have a well developed ground cover or shrub and young tree component, lack a closed, mature tree canopy, and are created or maintained by intense or recurring disturbances. Most ecologists and environmentalists agree that disturbances and early successional habitats are important to maintain the diverse flora and fauna native to deciduous eastern forests. Indeed, many species, including several listed as endangered, threatened, sensitive, or of management concern, require the openness and thick cover that early successional habitats can provide. Management of early successional habitats can be based on the “historic natural range of variation”, or can involve active forest management based on goals. In this book, expert scientists and experienced land managers synthesize knowledge and original scientific work to address critical questions on many topics related to early successional habitats in the Central Hardwood Region. Our aim is to collate information about early successional habitats, to aid researchers and resource management professionals in their quest to sustain wildlife and plant species that depend on or utilize these habitats.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature Cited
Annand EM, Thompson FR III (1997) Forest birds response to regeneration practices in central hardwood forests. J Wildl Manage 61:159–171
Askins RA (2001) Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats. Wildl Soc Bull 29:407–412
Bailey RG (1994) Ecoregions of the United States [map]. USDA For Serv (scale 1:7,500,000, revised, colored), Washington, DC
Blake JG, Hoppes WG (1986) Resource abundance and microhabitat use by birds in an isolated east-central Illinois woodlot. Auk 103:328–340
Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ. (Reprint of 1st ed)
Brawn JD, Robinson SK, Thompson FR III (2001) The role of disturbance in the ecology and conservation of birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:251–276
Brose P, Schuler T, Van Lear D, Berst J (2001) Bringing fire back: the changing regimes of the Appalachian mixed-oak forests. J For 99:30–35
Busing RT, White RD, Harmon ME, White PS (2009) Hurricane disturbance in a temperate deciduous forest: patch dynamics, tree mortality, and coarse woody detritus. Plant Ecol 201:351–363
Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnagie Institute of Washington Pub 242. Washington, DC 17.3.3, 17.4.5
deMaynadier PG, Hunter ML Jr (1995) The relationship between forest management and amphibian ecology: a review of the North American literature. Environ Rev 3:230–261
Dessecker DR, McAuley DG (2001) Importance of early successional habitat to ruffed grouse and American woodcock. Wildl Soc Bull 29:456–465
Garshelis DL (2000) Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. In: Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 111–164
Greenberg CH (2002) Fire, habitat structure and herpetofauna in the Southeast. In: Ford WM, Russell KR, Moorman CE (eds), The role of fire in nongame wildlife management and community restoration: traditional uses and new directions. Gen Tech Rep NE-288, USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 73–90
Greenberg CH, Lanham DJ (2001) Breeding bird assemblages of hurricane-created gaps and adjacent closed canopy forest in the Southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manage 153:251–260
Greenberg CH, Livings-Tomcho A, Lanham AD, Waldrop TA, Tomcho J, Phillips RJ, Simon D (2007a) Short-term effects of fire and other fuel reduction treatments on breeding birds in a Southern Appalachian hardwood forest. J Wildl Manage 71:1906–1916
Greenberg CH, Levey DJ, Loftis DL (2007b) Fruit production in mature and recently regenerated forests of the Appalachians. J Wildl Manage 71:321–335
Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML (1997) The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildl Soc Bull 25:173–182
Hunter WC, Buehler DA, Canterbury RA, Confer JL, Hamel PB (2001) Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America. Wildl Soc Bull 29:440–455
Keever C (1950) Causes of succession on old-fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina. Ecol Monogr 20:320–350
Keever C (1983) A retrospective view of old-field succession after 35 years. Am Midl Nat 110:397–404
Litvaitis JA (1993) Response of early-successional vertebrates to historic changes in land-use. Conserv Biol 7:866–873
Litvaitis JA (2001) Importance of early successional habitats to mammals in eastern forests. Wildl Soc Bull 29:466–473
Loeb SC, O’Keefe JM (2006) Habitat use by forest bats in South Carolina in relation to local, stand, and landscape characteristics. J Wildl Manage 70:1210–1218
Lorimer CG (1993) Causes of the oak regeneration problem. In: Loftis DL, McGee CE (eds) Oak regeneration: serious problems, practical recommendations. Gen Tech Rep SE-84, USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, pp 14–39
Lorimer CG (2001) Historical and ecological roles of disturbance in eastern North American forests: 9000 years of change. Wildl Soc Bull 29:425–439
Lorimer CG, White AS (2003) Scale and frequency of natural disturbances in the northeastern US: implications for early successional forest habitats and regional age distributions. For Ecol Manage 185:41–64
Odum EP (1960) Organic production and turnover in old field succession. Ecology 41:34–49
Runkle JR (1990) Gap dynamics in an Ohio Acer-Fagus forest and speculations on the geography of disturbance. Can J For Res 20:632–641
Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen Tech Rep NC-241, USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul, 137 p
Stephenson NL (1990) Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of the water balance. Am Nat 135:649–670
Thompson FR III, DeGraaf RM (2001) Conservation approaches for woody-early successional communities in the eastern USA. Wildl Soc Bull 29:483–494
Thompson JN, Willson MF (1978) Disturbance and dispersal of fleshy fruits. Science 200:1161–1163
Trani MK, Brooks RT, Schmidt TL, Rudis VR, Gabbard CM (2001) Patterns and trends of early successional forest in the eastern United States. Wildl Soc Bull 29:413–424
Whitehead MA (2003) Seasonal variation in food resource availability and avian communities in four habitat types in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenberg, C.H., Collins, B., Thompson, F.R., McNab, W.H. (2011). Introduction: What Are Early Successional Habitats, Why Are They Important, and How Can They Be Sustained?. In: Greenberg, C., Collins, B., Thompson III, F. (eds) Sustaining Young Forest Communities. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1620-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1620-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1619-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1620-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)