Skip to main content

Agroecology – Interpretations, Approaches and Their Links to Nature Conservation, Rural Development and Ecotourism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus ((AGRO,volume 1))

Abstract

Different interpretations and definitions of agroecology are currently used world-wide. They vary from agroecology as a practice, agroecology as a movement, and varying approaches to agroecology as a scientific discipline, which are the plot/field, the agroecosystem, and the food system approach. The evolution of the interpretations and definitions are often closely linked to differences in the historical development of agroecology in different countries and regions of the world. More and more topics have become related to agroecology in recent years. In the second part of this review, we analyse and discuss the integration and linking of rural development, nature conservation and ecotourism, both within and to the framework of agroecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alard D (1994) Grassland vegetation as an indicator of the main agro-ecological factors in a rural landscape: consequences for biodiversity and wildlife conservation in central Normandy (France). J Environ Manage 42(2):91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1987) Agroecology: the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Westview, Boulder, 227 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1989) Agroecology: a new research and development paradigm for world agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 27:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1993) Ethnoscience and biodiversity: key elements in the design of sustainable pest management systems for small farmers in developing countries. Agric Ecosyst Environ 46:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1994) Biodiversity and pest management in agroecosystems. Haworth, New York, 185 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview, Boulder, 433 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74(1–3):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA, Letourneau DK, Davis JR (1983) Developing sustainable agroecosystems. Bioscience 33:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrignon J (1987) Agro-écologie des zones arides et sub-humides. Editions G.-P. Masonneuve & Larose et ACCT, Paris, 283 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzi G (1928) Agricultural ecology (in Italian). Edition Tipografia Editrice Torinese, Turin, 237 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzi G (1956) Agricultural ecology. Constable & Company, London, 424 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensin BM (1928) Agroecological characteristics, description and classification of the local corn varieties chorotypes. Book (Publisher unknown)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensin BM (1930) Possibilities for international cooperation in agroecological investigations. International review of agriculture. Mon Bull Agric Sci Pract (Rome) 21:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensin BM (1938) Agroecology as a basic science of agriculture. Book (Publisher unknown)

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporal FR, Costabeber JA, Paulus G (2006) Agroecologia: matriz disciplinar ou novo paradigma para o desenvolvimento rural sustentavel. In: 3rd Congreso Brasileiro de Agroecologia, Florianopolis, Anais: CBA, 25 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll CR, Vandermeer JH, Rosset PM (1990) Agroecology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 641 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chape S, Blyth S, Fish L, Fox P, Spalding M (2003) United Nations list of protected areas. In: IUCN – The World Conservation Union, IUCN, Gland/Cambridge and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, 45 pp. http://www.unep-wcmc.org/wdpa/unlist/2003_UN_LIST.pdf. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Clements DR, Shrestha A (2004) New dimensions in agroecology for developing a biological approach to crop production. In: Clements DR, Shrestha A (eds.) New dimensions in agroecology. Haworth, New York, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins WW, Qualset CO (eds.) (1999) Biodiversity in agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton/New York, 334 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil Général du GREF (1999) Identification et structuration des territoires – recueil de recommandations méthodologiques. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche, 35 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway GR (1987) The properties of agroecosystems. Agric Syst 24:95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox GW, Atkins MD (1979) Agricultural ecology: an analysis of world food production systems. W.H. Freeman and Sons, San Francisco, 721 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Crop Science, Agroecology Section, University of Göttingen (2008) Introduction. http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~uaoe/Agroecology.html. Accessed Jan 2008

  • Dodelin P-Y, Pluvinet P (2006) Valorisation des fonctions non marchandises de l’agriculture: Expérimentation sur deux communes du Parc Naturel Régional des Monts d’Ardèche. Masters thesis, ISARA Lyon, Lyon, 118 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover M, Talbot LM (1987) To feed the earth: agro-ecology for sustainable development. World Resources Institute, Washington, 88 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Europarc Federation (2010) European Charter for sustainable tourism in protected areas. http://www.european-charter.org. Accessed May 2010

  • European Commission (2010a) Introduction to Leader+. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rur/leaderplus/index_en.htm. Accessed May 2010

  • European Commission (2010b) Leader+  Lignes directrices pour l’évaluation ex ante des programmes (Guidelines for the ex ante evaluation of programmes). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rur/leaderplus/guidelines/eval_fr.pdf. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Flade M, Plachter H, Schmidt R, Wener A (2006) Introduction. In: Flade M, Plachter H, Schmidt R, Wener A (eds.) Nature conservation in agricultural ecosystems. Results of the Schorfheide-Chorin Research Project. Quelle & Meyer, Wiedbaden, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca CR, Ganade G (2001) Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J Ecol 89:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis C, Lieblein G, Gliessman S, Breland TA, Creamer N, Harwood R, Salomonsson L, Helenius J, Rickerl D, Salvador R, Wiedenhoeft M, Simmons S, Allen P, Altieri M, Flora C, Poincelot R (2003) Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. J Sustain Agr 22(3):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederichs K (1930) Die Grundfragen und Gesetzmäßigkeiten der land- und forstwirtschaftlichen Zoologie. Vol 1: Ökologischer Teil, vol 2: Wirtschaftlicher Teil. Verlagsbuchhandlung Paul Parey, Berlin, 417 and 443 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman SR (ed) (1990) Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture, vol 78, Ecological studies. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman SR (1997) Agroecology: ecological processes in sustainable agriculture. Chelsea, Ann Arbor, 384 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman SR (2007) Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food systems. CRC/Taylor & Francis, New York, 384 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampicke U (1988) Extensivierung der Landwirtschaft für den Naturschutz: Ziele, Rahmenbedingungen und Maßnahmen. Schriftenreihe Bayerisches Landesamt für Umweltschutz 84:9–35, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénin S (1967) Les acquisitions techniques en production végétale et leurs applications. Economie Rurale, SFER, Paris, pp 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Henricksen BJ (1986) Determination of agro-ecological zones in Africa: ILCA activities and expectations. ILCA Bull 23:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Xolocotzi E (ed.) (1977) Agroecosistemas de Mexico: Contribuciones a la Ensenanza, Investigacion, y Divulgacion Agricola. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydemann B (1953) Agrarökologische Problematik, dargetan an Untersuchungen über die Tierwelt der Bodenoberfläche der Kulturen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kiel, Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey M (2008) Ecotourism and sustainable development: who owns paradise? 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington DC, 416 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75(1):3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFEN (Institut Français de l’Environnement) (1998) L’Environnement en France. Editions La Découverte et Syros et Institut Français de l’Environnement, Paris, 480 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • International Ecotourism Society (2010) What is ecotourism? http://www.ecotourism.org/. Accessed Apr 2010

  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (1980) World conservation strategy: living resource conservation for sustainable development. IUCN, Gland, 44 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauneau J-C, Mundler P (2007) Remuneration of non-market functions in agriculture – experimentation in two communities of the Regional Natural Park of “Monts d’Ardèche”. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international scientific conference on rural development, Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Kaunas, 6 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns ND (1998) Conservation in Brazil’s chocolate forest: the unlikely persistence of the traditional cocoa agroecosystem. Environ Manage 23(1):31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klages KHW (1928) Crop ecology and ecological crop geography in the agronomic curriculum. J Am Soc Agron 10:336–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Klages KHW (1942) Ecological crop geography. Macmillan, New York, 615 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • López i Gelats F (2004) A discursive approach to agricultural and rural policy in Europe. Paper presented at the 3rd global conference – environmental justice & global citizenship, Copenhagen, 12–14 Feb 2004. http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/critical-issues/ethos/environmental-justice-and-global-citizenship/project-archives/2004/session-6a-organic-agriculture-ecology-and-sustainability/. Accessed July 2009

  • Lovell ST, DeSantis S, Nathan CA, Breton Olson M, Méndez VE, Kominami HC, Erickson DL, Morris KS, Morris WB (2010) Integrating agroecology and landscape multifunctionality in Vermont: an evolving framework to evaluate the design of agroecosystems. Agric Syst 103(5):327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin K, Sauerborn J (2006) Agrarökologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart, UTB 2793, 297 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resource Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère de l’Ecologie et du Développement Durable (2005) Territorial sustainable development projects and local agenda 21, France, 6 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Moonen AC, Bàrberi P (2008) Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach. Agr Ecosyst Environ 127:7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss SR (1980) The agro-ecology and control of black-grass, Alopecurus-myosuroides huds, in modern cereal growing systems. ADAS Quart Rev 38:170–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundler P (2006) La multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture: enjeux théoriques et d’arbitrage entre politiques sectorielles et politiques territoriales. In: Jean B, Lafontaine D (eds.) La multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture et des territoires ruraux: enjeux théoriques et d’action publique. CRDT – GRIDEQ, Rimouski

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundler P (2008) L’agriculture en Rhône-Alpes, une multifonctionnalité évidente? In: Cornu P, Mayaud JL (eds.) Nouvelles questions agraires. Exploitants, fonctions et territoires. Collection pluridisciplinaire du Laboratoire d’études rurales/La Boutique de l’Histoire éditions, Lyon/Paris, pp 275–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Multifunctionality: towards an analytical framework. OECD Publications Service, Paris, 28 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohl J, Wezel A, Shepard GH Jr, Douglas WY (2008) Swidden agriculture in a protected area: the Matsigenka native communities of Manu National Park, Peru. Environ Dev Sustain 10:821–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parc Naturel Régional des Monts d’Ardèche (2010) Bienvenue dans le Parc naturel régional des Monts d’Ardèche. www.parc-monts-ardeche.fr. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Pecqueur B (1989) Le développement local: mode ou modèle? Syros, Paris, 149 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Puia I, Soran V (1984) Agroecologie: ecosistem si agroecosistem. Agronomia, Cluj-Napoca

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellhorn NA, Macfadyen S, Bianchi FJJA, Williams DG, Zalucki MP (2008) Managing ecosystem services in broader landscapes: what are the appropriate spatial scales? Aust J Exp Agr 48:1549–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Anderson JM (1994) Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems. In: Schulze E-D, Monney HA (eds.) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Izac A-MN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes – are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas VG, Kevan PG (1993) Basic principles of agroecology and sustainable agriculture. J Agric Environ Ethics 6(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischler W (1950) Ergebnisse und Probleme der Agrarökologie. Schriftenreihe der Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät Kiel 3:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischler W (1965) Agrarökologie. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 499 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP, CMS (2010) Convention on migratory species. www.cms.int. Accessed Apr 2010

  • UNEP, UN (2010) Convention on biological diversity. www.cbd.int. Accessed Apr 2010

  • UNEP-WCMC (2010) Defining protected area management categories. www.unep-wcmc.org/protected_areas/categories/index.html. Accessed Apr 2010

  • UNESCO (2010a) Biosphere reserves. http://portal.unesco.org/science/en/ev.php-URL_ID=4801&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed Apr 2010

  • UNESCO (2010b) World Heritage list. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Vavilov NJ (1957) Agroecological survey of the main field crops. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Jerusalem/Monson, 442 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Vercors Regional Natural Park (2010) Introduction page of the Vercors Regional Natural Park. www.parc-du-vercors.fr/eng/. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Werner A, Roth R, Zander P, Meyer-Aurich A, Jarfe A (2006) Scientific background for nature conservation agriculture. In: Flade M, Plachter H, Schmidt R, Werner A (eds.) Nature conservation in agricultural ecosystems. Results of the Schorfheide-Chorin Research Project. Quelle & Meyer, Wiedbaden, pp 529–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Bender S (2002) Agricultural land use in the coastal area of the Alexander von Humboldt National Park, Cuba, and its implication for conservation and sustainability. GeoJournal 57(4):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Soldat V (2009) A quantitative and qualitative historical analysis of the scientific discipline of agroecology. Int J Agric Sustain 7(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C (2009) Agroecology as a science, a movement or a practice. A review. Agron Sustainable Dev 29:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA (2008) From ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ multifunctionality: conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. J Rural Stud 24:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojtkowski PA (2002) Agroecological perspectives in agronomy, forestry and agroforestry. Science Publishers, Enfield, 356 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D, Lenné JM (1999) Why agrobiodiversity? In: Wood D, Lenné JM (eds.) Agrobiodiversity: characterization, utilisation and management. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Bruce Campbell very much for his comments and corrections on the manuscript. The discussions on agroecology and inputs from Stephan Bellon, Christophe David, Thierry Doré, Charles Francis, Virginie Soldat and Dominique Vallod also are highly acknowledged as they laid the foundation for the first half of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Wezel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wezel, A., Jauneau, JC. (2011). Agroecology – Interpretations, Approaches and Their Links to Nature Conservation, Rural Development and Ecotourism. In: Campbell, W., Lopez Ortiz, S. (eds) Integrating Agriculture, Conservation and Ecotourism: Examples from the Field. Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1309-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics