Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Certain Uncertainty: The Political Ecology of Environmental Security

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Warfare Ecology

  • 1450 Accesses

Abstract

Aligning with the effort to establish warfare ecology as a disciplined bridge to advance ecological science to inform policy decisions and implementation and offset negative environmental consequences, this chapter suggests linking two propositions. The first is that the praxis of security should be understood as extreme efforts within a state’s larger management of uncertainty about the future. By focusing on a motivation for government action rather than a locus of bureaucratic activity, such an approach may open the possibility for a more nuanced discussion about the idea of security. Within this wider frame, it is possible to recognize relationships among sources of uncertainty and alternative responses. Further, there is the conceptual flexibility for issues to be escalated when great uncertainty is identified and de-escalated as the means to address an uncertainty are developed and incorporated into normal routines of public administration. The second proposition is that the planning, design, and use of the environment are fundamental aspects of a state’s response to uncertainty and vulnerability. We examine military lands and their surrounding regions as sites where the management of multiple uncertainties are negotiated for the needs of national defense and ecological sustainability. Equally, for military operations themselves, we also give brief consideration to the environments where military forces are adapting themselves for future engagements and their implications for warfare ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notably, the one warfare type not commonly debated in recent history (but whose implications would far exceed all other types) is nuclear war.

References

  1. Concept, No. 900702 (1996) Implanted tactical information display. 2025 concepts database. Air War College, Maxwell AFB

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams RM (1981) Heartland of cities: surveys of ancient settlement and lands use on the central floodplain of the Euphrates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adams TK (2001–2002) Future warfare and the decline of human decisionmaking. Parameters 31(4):57–71

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agnew J (1994) The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Rev Int Polit Econ 1(1):53–80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Algaze G (2001) Initial social complexity in Southwestern Asia: the Mesopotamian advantage. Curr Anthropol 42(2):199–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andreas P, Price R (2001) From war fighting to crime fighting: transforming the American national security state. Int Stud 4:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold JR, Wiener R (1989) The US Army Corps of Engineers and natural resources ­management on army installations 1941–1987. Engineering and Housing Support Center and Office of History, US Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ashby E (1978) Reconciling man with the environment. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ashworth GJ (1991) War and the city. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Austin JE, Bruch CE (eds.) (2000) The environmental consequences of war: legal, economic, and scientific perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Copernicus/Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baldwin D (1997) The concept of security. Rev Int Stud 23(2):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Basiago AD (1995) Methods for defining “sustainability”. Sustain Dev 3(3):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck U (1999) Risk society revisited. In: Beck U (ed.) World risk society. Polity, Cambridge, pp 133–152

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bentham J (1848) The works of Jeremy Bentham. William Tait, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bigo D (2000) When two become one: internal and external securitisations in Europe. In: Kelstrup M, Williams M (eds.) International relations theory and politics of European integration: power, security and community. Routledge, London, pp 171–204

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boulding KE (1990) Three faces of power. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brown L (1977) Redefining national security (Worldwatch Institute Paper #14). Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bush GHW (1991) National security strategy of the United States. The White House, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bush GHW (1991) President’s News Conference. NATO Summit, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  21. Butts KH (1999) The case for DoD involvement in environmental security. In: Heudney DH, Matthew RA (eds.) Contested grounds. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 109–126

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buzan B, Waever O, de Wilde J (1998) Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Reinner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2008) Urban principles for ecological landscape design and management: scientific fundamentals. Cities Environ 1(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  24. Caplan AL, McCartney JJ, Sisti DA (eds.) (2004) Health, disease, and illness: concepts in medicine. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chapman AW (1997) The national training center matures: 1985–1993. United States Army Training and Doctrine Command, Fort Monroe

    Google Scholar 

  27. Childs J (1998) The military use of land: a history of the defence estate. Peter Lang, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clausen JL, Korte N (2009) Environmental fate of tungsten from military use. Sci Total Environ 407(8):2887–2893

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Clinton WJ (1994) A national security strategy of engagement and enlargement. The White House, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cole DH (1924) Imperial military geography: general characteristics of empire in relation to its defense. Sifton Praed, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our global neighborhood. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  32. Connolly WE (1974) Terms of political discourse. Heath, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cooley A (2005) The politics of US bases abroad. Foreign Aff 84(6):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cooper R (2003) The breaking of nations: order and chaos in the twenty-first century. Atlantic Monthly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Costandina Titus A (1986) Bombs in the backyard: atomic testing and American politics, 2nd edn. University of Nevada Press, Reno

    Google Scholar 

  36. Costanza R (1984) Review essay: the nuclear arms race and the theory of social traps. J Peace Stud 21(1):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Daily GC, Alexander S, Erlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 1(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  38. DARPA program: preventing sleep deprivation. http://www.ampakines.org/sleepdep.htm; http://www.provigilweb.org/q9.htm

  39. Deudney DH (1990) The case against linking environmental degradation and national security. Millennium 19:461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Deudney DH (1999) Environmental security: a critique. In: Deudney DH, Matthew RA (eds.) Contested grounds: security and conflict in the new environmental politics. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 187–219

    Google Scholar 

  41. Diamond JM (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dillon M (1996) Politics of security: towards a political philosophy of continental thought. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dower N (1995) Peace and security: some conceptual notes. In: Salla M, Tonettto W, Martinez E (eds.) Essays on peace: paradigms for global order. Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton, pp 18–23

    Google Scholar 

  44. Durant RF (2007) The greening of the US military. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dwyer T (2006) Supervisors freeze home construction. The Washington Post 6 Dec 2006: B06

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dycus S (1996) National defense and the environment. University of New England Press, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  47. Elias N (1956) Problems of involvement and detachment. Br J Sociol 7(3):226–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Elliott D (2008) A better way to zone: ten principles to create more livable cities. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fearon JD (1998) Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations. Annu Rev Polit Sci 1:289–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Finnemore M, Barnett M (2004) Rules for the world: international organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fitzgerald MC (1997) Impact of the RMA on Russian Military Affairs; Russian views on electronic and information warfare, vol I & II. Hudson Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  52. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Forester CS (1956) The age of fighting sail. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  54. Forrestal J (1945) Testimony, hearings on S. 84 and S. 1482 before the Senate Committee on Military Affairs. 79th Congress, 1st Sess. 299

    Google Scholar 

  55. Future warrior concept. http://www.natick.army.mil/soldier/media/fact/individual/FW.htm

  56. Galison P (2001) War against the center. Grey Room 4:6–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gallie WB (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proc Aristotelian Soc 56:167–198

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gell-Mann M (1995) The quark and the jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  60. Giddens A (1995) Beyond left and right. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  61. Haas EB (1980) Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Polit 32(3):357–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Haas PM (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hampton HD (1971) How the US cavalry saved our national parks. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  64. Helphand KI (2006) Defiant gardens: the making of gardens in wartime. Trinity University Press, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  65. Herz JH (1950) Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Polit 2:157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Herz JH (1951) Political realism and political idealism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hobbes T (2004) [1651] The Leviathan. Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hoffman FG (2007) Conflict in the 21st century: the rise of hybrid wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  69. Holling CS (2000) Theories for sustainable futures. Conser Ecol 4(2):article 7. http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art7/. Accessed 17 Aug 2009

  70. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hurd I (1999) Legitimacy and authority in international politics. Int Organ 53(2):379–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Huysmans J (1998) Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. Eur J Int Relat 4(2):226–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Huysmans J (2004) Minding exceptions: the politics of insecurity and liberal democracy. Contemp Polit Theory 3:321–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hylton WS (2003) The war on drugs: the Pentagon wants to keep soldiers awake indefinitely. For now, they’re using pills. Soon, they may have something better. Esquire February. http://www.esquire.com/ESQ0203-FEB_DREAMS_rev_2?click=main_sr

  75. Information Paper: DARPA’s Preventing Sleep Deprivation Program (2007) http://www.darpa.mil/Docs/PSD_info_paper_Oct07_200807180945043.pdf and “DARPA Program: Preventing Sleep Deprivation” http://www.ampakines.org/sleepdep.htm; http://www.provigilweb.org/q9.htm

  76. Kelly W (1970). Poster for the first Earth Day

    Google Scholar 

  77. Krause K, Williams MC (eds.) (1997) Critical security studies: concepts and cases. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lachman BE, Wong A, Resetar SA (2007) The thin green line: an assessment of DoD’s readiness and environmental protection initiatives to buffer installation encroachment. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  79. LeBlanc SA (2003) Constant battles: the myth of the peaceful, nobel savage. St Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  80. Light JS (2003) From warfare to welfare: defense intellectuals and urban problems in cold war America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  81. Linenthal E (1993) Sacred ground: Americans and their battlefields, 2nd edn. University of Illinois Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  82. Liotta PH (2005) Through the looking glass: creeping vulnerabilities and the reordering of security. Secur Dialogue 36(1):49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Litfin KT (ed.) (1998) The greening of sovereignty in world politics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  84. Little R (1981) Ideology and change. In: Buzan B, Barry Jones RJ (eds.) Change and the study of international relations. Pinter, London, pp 30–45

    Google Scholar 

  85. Madrigal A (2007). Snorting a brain chemical could replace sleep. Wired.com. 28 Dec. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/12/sleep_deprivation

  86. Malthus TR (1798) An essay on the principle of population. Electronic Scholarly Publishing Project, London

    Google Scholar 

  87. Mansfield H (1983) On the impersonality of the modern state: a comment on Machiavelli’s use of Stato. Am Polit Sci Rev 77:849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Markusen A, Hal P, Campbell S, Deitrick S (1991) The rise of the gunbelt: the military remapping of industrial America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  89. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds.) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  90. McSweeney B (1999) Security, identity, and interests: a sociology of international relations. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  91. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment—A Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2003. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  92. Milliken FJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad Manage Rev 12(1):133–143

    Google Scholar 

  93. Montgomery DR (2007) Dirt: the erosion of civilizations. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  94. Mumford L (1961) The city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  95. Neocleous M (2000) The fabrication of social order: a critical theory of police power. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  96. Novak WJ (2008) Police power and the hidden transformation of the American state. In: Dubber MD, Valverde M (eds.) Police power and the liberal state. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 54–73

    Google Scholar 

  97. O’Malley P (2004) Risk, uncertainty and government. Glasshouse Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  98. O’Neill K (2006) Rivers by design: state power and the origins of US flood control. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  99. Odum EP (1993) Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  100. Owens S (2003) Is there a meaningful definition of sustainability? Plant Genet Resour 1(1):5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Pearce F (2006) When the rivers run dry: water–the defining crisis of the twenty-first century. Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  103. Peterson M (2006) The precautionary principle is incoherent. Risk Anal 26(3):595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Plato (2009) The socratic dialogues, Benjamin Jowett, trans. Kaplan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rathbun BC (2007) Uncertain about uncertainty: understanding the multiple meanings of a crucial concept in international relations theory. Int Stud Q 51(3):533–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Revkin AC (2004) The sky is falling! Say Hollywood and, yes, the Pentagon. The New York Times 29 Feb:4

    Google Scholar 

  107. Ripsman NM (2000) The political economy of security: a research and teaching agenda. J Mil Strateg Stud 3(1). http://www.jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/view/264/278

  108. Rose MH (1979) Interstate: express highway politics, 1941–1956. Regents Press of Kansas, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  109. Rosner JD (1994) Is chaos America’s real enemy? The foreign policy idea splitting Clinton’s team. The Washington Post, 14 Aug 1994

    Google Scholar 

  110. Rostow WW (1975) How it all began: origins of the modern economy. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  111. Rubenson D, Aroesty J, Thompsen C (1992) Two shades of green: environmental protection and combat training. Rand Corporation Report # R-4220-A. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  112. Rubenson D, Weissler R, Wong C, Everson R (1999) Does the army have a national land use strategy? Rand Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  113. Ryan C (ed.) (2007) Battlefield tourism, history, place, and interpretation. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  114. Schmitt C (1976 [1932]) The concept of the political, trans George Schwab. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  115. Shennen JH (1974) The origins of the modern European state, 1450–1725. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  116. Sidel VW (2000) The impact of military preparedness and militarism on health and the environment. In: Austin JE, Bruch CE (eds.) The environmental consequences of war: legal, economic, and scientific perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 426–443

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  117. Simons A (1999) War: back to the future. Annu Rev Anthropol 28(1):73–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Singer PW (2009) Robots at war: the new battlefield. Wilson Q 33(1):30–48

    Google Scholar 

  119. Skinner Q (1978) The foundations of modern political thought, II: the age of reformation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  120. Skinner Q (1989) The state. In: Ball T, Farr J, Hanson RL (eds.) Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 90–131

    Google Scholar 

  121. Stein BA, Scott C, Benton N (2008) Federal lands and endangered species: the role of military and other federal lands in sustaining biodiversity. Bioscience 58(4):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Stilgoe JR (1982) Common landscape of America, 1580–1845. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  123. Styrbara Signaturmaterial: Forskning 2004–2005 (Adaptable Camouflage Materials 2004–2005). http://ntis.library.gatech.edu/handle/123456789/955

  124. Tainter JA (1988) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  125. Tannert C, Horst-Dietrich E, Jandrig B (2007) The ethics of uncertainty. Eur Mol Biol Organ Rep 8(10):892–896

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Tawney RH (1966 [1931]) Land and labor in China. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  127. Ullman RH (1983) Redefining security. Int Secur 8(1):129–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Van Asselt MBA, Vos E (2006) The precautionary principle and the uncertainty paradox. J Risk Res 9(4):313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Waever O (1995) Securitization and desecuritization. In: Lipschutz R (ed.) On security. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  130. Walker RBJ (1997) The subject of security. In: Krause K, Williams MC (eds.) Critical security studies: concepts and cases. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  131. Weber M (1968 [1922]) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, 3 vols, trans Ephraim Fischoff. Bedminster Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  132. Weida WJ, Gertcher FL (1987) The political economy of national defense. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  133. Welch DA (2005) Painful choices: a theory of foreign policy change. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policy, Salve Regina University, Newport, RI, USA

    Peter H. Liotta

  2. School of Architecture, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    Allan W. Shearer

Authors
  1. Peter H. Liotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allan W. Shearer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter H. Liotta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844, Idaho, USA

    Gary E. Machlis

  2. False Bay Dr. 351, Friday Harbor, 98250, Washington, USA

    Thor Hanson

  3. , Institute for Applied Ecology, Oikon Ltd., Avenija Dubrovnik 6-8, Zagreb, 10 020, Croatia

    Zdravko Špirić

  4. Association of American Geographers, 1710 16th Street, NW, Washington, 20009-3198, District of Columbia, USA

    Jean E. McKendry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liotta, P.H., Shearer, A.W. (2011). The Certain Uncertainty: The Political Ecology of Environmental Security. In: Machlis, G., Hanson, T., Špirić, Z., McKendry, J. (eds) Warfare Ecology. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1214-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation