Abstract
Excessive attention to the personal dimension may distract the reader or audience member in responding to Anton Chekhov’s The Sea Gull from noticing the most important meaning of the play: the dialectic over the source, form, and goal of art. As for the source of art, Chekhov’s character Nina says that the source of her acting art is her faith in herself; Konstantin sees the source of art as a gush that spontaneously surges from the soul of the artist, as he or she tries to stop thinking; and the play shows Boris taking notes from life for ideas he has for stories and novels. As far as form goes, Konstantin writes literature full of abstract ideas in what might be called an idealist form. Boris’s form is clearly realism. Pertaining to the goal of art, Boris clearly says that he wants to serve his country, the nation he loves, by describing the suffering of her people. The only objective stated by Konstantin is the self-referential one of creating new forms. Dr. Dorn says that no clear goal can be discerned in Konstantin’s art. Although the play presents several personal motives for Konstantin’s suicide, it also shows him realizing the superiority of Boris’s approach to art. Thus, in having Konstantin commit suicide, Chekov may be showing which side he takes in the debate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chekhov, Anton. 1971. After the theatre (1892), trans. Ronald Hingley, 83–88. The Oxford Chekhov, vol. VI, Stories: 1892–1893. London: Oxford University Press.
Chekhov, Anton. 1977. The sea gull, trans. Eugene K. Bristow, C1–51. Anton Chekhov’s Plays. New York, NY: Norton.
Collins, Jerre, and Raymond J. Wilson III. 1993. Albee’s Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? The issue of originality. American Drama (Spring): 50–75.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and method (1960). New York, NY: Crossroad.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Time and narrative, vol. I, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin, and David Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1966. Being and nothingness: A phenomenological essay on nothingness (1956), trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York, NY, Washington Square Press.
Wilde, Oscar. 1971. The decay of lying (1889). In Critical theory since Plato, ed. Hazard Adams, 672–686. New York, NY: Harcourt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, R.J. (2011). The Source, Form, and Goal of Art in Anton Chekhov’s The Sea Gull . In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Destiny, the Inward Quest, Temporality and Life. Analecta Husserliana, vol 109. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0773-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0773-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0772-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0773-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)