Skip to main content

Prior Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 633 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis ((PSDE,volume 28))

Abstract

This chapter provides an extensive overview of prior studies and research related to the incidence of poverty among Mexican Americans and immigrants in the United States. It is divided into six sub-sections including a general overview of poverty and how it is defined according to the US government; a discussion of the utility and necessity for a relative measure of poverty; a review of the literature dealing with the micro and macro level predictors of poverty among all groups in the US; a discussion of how immigrants in particular are impacted by poverty; a history of the migration trends between Mexico and the US; a discussion of the most important policies enacted relative to this population and their impacts; and a presentation of the expected contributions to be made by this book. This chapter concludes with a brief accounting of policy changes which have had or are estimated to have the greatest impacts on the Mexican American and immigrant population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is based on the finding made by the USDA’s 1955 Food Consumption Survey which showed that families of three or more spent approximately one third of their total income on food.

  2. 2.

    Poverty statistics in ACS products adhere to the standards specified by the Office of Management and Budget in Statistical Policy Directive 14. The Census Bureau uses a set of dollar value thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. Further, poverty thresholds for people living alone or with nonrelatives (unrelated individuals) vary by age (under 65 years or 65 years and older). The poverty thresholds for two-person families also vary by the age of the householder. If a family’s total income is less than the dollar value of the appropriate threshold, then that family and every individual in it are considered to be in poverty. Similarly, if an unrelated individual’s total income is less than the appropriate threshold, then that individual is considered to be in poverty.

  3. 3.

    The measure for relative poverty considered in the analyses is limited by the fact that the estimates are based on average household median incomes made available by the Census. It is meant to provide a general estimation of relative poverty and has been applied to all households regardless of age/household size given the similarities in family structure.

  4. 4.

    The National Bureau of Economic Research measured the duration of the recession as lasting from March to November of 2001. This recession had the largest impacts upon Hispanic and Black households, eroding about one quarter of their wealth within 2 years (Kochhar 2004).

  5. 5.

    The “residual method” is used to estimate the undocumented migrant population and is obtained by subtracting the estimated legal-immigrant population from the total foreign-born population. The residual value is then treated as the source of data for the unauthorized population.

References

  • Albrecht, Don E., Albrecht Carol Mulford, and Stan L. Albrecht. 2000. Poverty in Nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of Industrial, Employment, and Family Structure Variables. Rural Sociology 65 (1): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Tony, Bea Cantillon, Eric Marlier, and Brian Nolan. 2002. Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B., Eric Marlier, and Brian Nolan. 2004. Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, Frank D., Edward E. Telles, and B. Lindsay Lowell. 1987. Undocumented Migration to the United States: Perceptions and Evidence. Population and Development Review 13 (4): 671–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, Rebecca M. 2008. Presidential Address: How to Improve Poverty Measurement in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management 27 (2): 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, David L., Louis E. Swanson, and Alan W. Barton. 2003. Challenges for Rural America in the Twenty-First Century, Rural studies series. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office, CBO. 2005. Remittances: International Payments by Migrants. In A Series on Immigration. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, David A. 2002. Poor People in Poor Places: Local Opportunity Structures and Household Poverty. Rural Sociology 67 (4): 534–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, Martha, Daniel T. Lichter, and Qian Zhenchao. 2006. Beyond Gateway Cities: Economic Restructuring and Poverty Among Mexican Immigrant Families and Children. Family Relations 55 (3): 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, Sheldon H. 2007, Spring-Summer. Fighting Poverty Revisited: What did Researchers Know 40 Years Ago? What do We Know Today? Focus 25 (1): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPrete, Thomas A., and Jerry D. Forristal. 1994. Multilevel Models: Methods and Substance. Annual Review of Sociology 20 (1): 331–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, Katherine M. 1994. U.S. Policy and Mexican Migration to the United States, 1942–92. Social Science Quarterly 75 (4): 705–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Hall, Ayana, and Heather Koball. 2004. Children of Recent Immigrants: National and Regional Trends. Washington, DC: National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, Jorge, and Douglas S. Massey. 1999. The New Era of Mexican Migration to the United States. Journal of American History 86 (2): 518–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, Barbara, and William M. Mason. 1985. Multilevel Effects of Socioeconomic Development and Family Planning Programs on Children Ever Born. The American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 616–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, Thomas J., and Katherine Hempstead. 1996. Contemporary American Attitudes Toward US Immigration. International Migration Review 30 (2): 535–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fix, Michael, and Jeffrey Passel. 2002. The Scope and Impact of Welfare Reform’s Immigrant Provisions. In Assessing the New Federalism. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontenot, Kayla, Joachim Singelmann, Tim Slack, Carlos Siordia, Dudley Poston, and Rogelio Saenz. 2010. Understanding Falling Poverty in the Poorest Places: An Examination of the Experience of the Texas Borderland and Lower Mississippi Delta, 1990–2000. Journal of Poverty 14 (2): 216–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragomen, Austin T. Jr. 1997. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996: An Overview. International Migration Review 31 (2): 438–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P., and Walter T. Martin. 1962. Urbanization, Technology, and the Division of Labor: International Patterns. American Sociological Review 27 (5): 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P., and Dudley L. Poston. 1975. The Division of Labor: Conceptualization and Related Measures. Social Forces 53: 468–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar, Rakesh. 2004. The Wealth of Hispanic Households: 1996 to 2002. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, Daniel T., and Martha L. Crowley. 2002. Poverty in America: Beyond Welfare Reform. Population Bulletin 57 (2): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas S. 1995. The New Immigration and Ethnicity in the United States. Population and Development Review 21 (3): 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Robert T., and Anthony B. Atkinson. 1997. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Advancing the Consumer Interest 9 (1): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosisa, Abraham. 2003. A Profile of the Working Poor, 2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notten, Geranda, and Chris de Neubourg. 2007. Relative or Absolute Poverty in the US and EU? The Battle of the Rates. The Netherlands: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orthner, Dennis K., Hinckley Jones-Sanpei, and Sabrina Williamson. 2004. The Resilience and Strengths of Low-Income Families. Family Relations 53 (2): 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, Domenico, Diane K. McLaughlin, Steven Michael Grice, Michael Taquino, and Duane A. Gill. 2003. TANF Participation Rates: Do Community Conditions Matter? Rural Sociology 68 (4): 491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passel, Jeffrey. 2005. Estimates of the Size and Characteristics of the Undocumented Population. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, Jeffrey. 2006. The Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the US: Estimates Based on the March 2005 Current Population Survey. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, Josh, and Douglas S. Massey. 1980. History and Trends in US Bound Migration from a Mexican Town. The International Migration Review 14 (4): 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupasingha, Anil, and Stephan J. Goetz. 2007. Social and Political Forces as Determinants of Poverty: A Spatial Analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics 36 (4): 650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelmann, Joachim. 1978. From Agriculture to Services: The Transformation of Industrial Employment, Sage Library of Social Research, V. 69. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, Tim, Kayla Fontenot, Joachim Singelmann, Dudley L. Poston Jr., R. Saenz, and Carlos Siordia. 2009. Poverty in the Texas Borderland and Lower Mississippi Delta: A Comparative Analysis of Differences by Family Type. Demographic Research 20: 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, Timothy. 2006. Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suro, Roberto, Richard Fry, Rakesh Kochhar, and Jeffrey Passel. 2005. Hispanics: A People in Motion. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Urban Institute. 2006. Children of Immigrants: Facts and Figures. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, Office of Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trejo, Stephen J. 1997. Why Do Mexican Americans Earn Low Wages? Journal of Political Economy 105 (6): 1235–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Michael J., Frank D. Bean, and Thomas J. Espenshade. 1990. The US 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act and Undocumented Migration to the United States. Population Research and Policy Review 9: 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser, Richard V. 2009. Deconstructing European Poverty Measures: What Relative and Absolute Scales Measure. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28 (4): 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, Harry. 2009. Testimony on Income and Poverty in the United States: 2008. Paper read at Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress, at Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas S. 1981. Dimensions of the New Immigration to the United States and the Prospects for Assimilation. Annual Review of Sociology 7: 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Immigration Studies, CIS. 2001. Poverty and Income. San Diego, CA: Center for Immigration Studies (CIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro, Constance F., and Robert T. Michael. 1995. Poverty Panel on, and Assistance Family. Measuring poverty a new approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available from http://www.netlibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=739

  • Dinan, Kinsey Alden. 2005a. Federal Policies Restrict Immigrant Children’s Access to Key Public Benefits. In Children in Low-Income Families Policy Brief. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Gordon M. 1997. The Development and History of the US Poverty Thresholds – A Brief Overview, edited by D. o. H. a. H. Services. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, John H. 2000. Poverty Among Working Families: Findings from Experimental Poverty Measures. In Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science, NAS. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suro, Roberto, Jeffrey S. Passel, and Center Pew Hispanic. 2003. The Rise of the Second Generation: Changing Patterns in Hispanic Patterns in Hispanic Population Growth. Washington, D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACS. 2006a. United States Census Bureau, edited by U. C. Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS): Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ginny Garcia .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garcia, G. (2011). Prior Studies. In: Mexican American and Immigrant Poverty in the United States. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0539-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics