Skip to main content

Design Agents and the Need for High-Dimensional Perception

  • Conference paper
Book cover Design Computing and Cognition ’10

Abstract

Designed artefacts may be quantified by any number of measures. This paper aims to show that in doing so, the particular measures used may matter very little, but as many as possible should be taken. A set of building plans is used to demonstrate that arbitrary measures of their shape serve to classify them into neighbourhood types, and the accuracy of classification increases as more are used, even if the dimensionality of the space in which classification occurs is held constant. It is further shown that two autonomous agents may independently choose sets of attributes by which to represent the buildings, but arrive at similar judgements as more are used. This has several implications for studying or simulating design. It suggests that quantitative studies of collections of artefacts may be made without requiring extensive knowledge of the best possible measures—often impossible in real, ill-defined, design situations. It suggests a means by which the generation of novelty can be explained in a group of agents with different ways of seeing a given event. It also suggests that communication can occur without the need for predetermined codes or protocols, introducing the possibility of alternative human-computer interfaces that may be useful in design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Newell, A., Simon, H.: Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 19, 105–132 (1976)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dreyfus, H.: Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence 171, 1137–1160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haugeland, J.: The Nature and Plausibility of Cognitivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, 215–260 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schön, D.A.: Displacement of Concepts. Tavistock, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Akin, Ö., Akin, C.: Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Design Studies 17(4), 341–361 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke, D.L.: Analytical Archaeology. Methuen & Co., London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Snodgrass, A.B., Coyne, R.D.: Is designig hermeneutical? Architectural Theory Review 2(1), 65–97 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Czikszentmihalyi, M.: Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In: Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, pp. 325–339. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, A., Thornton, C.: Trading spaces: Computation, representation and the limits of uninformed learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 57–90 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Planning problems are wicked problems. In: Cross, N. (ed.) Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koestler, A.: The act of creation. Hutchinson (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Westfall, C.W.: Building Types. In: van Pelt, R.J., Westfall, C.W. (eds.) Architectural Principles in the Age of Historicism. Yale University Press, New Haven (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobsen, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rossi, A.: The Architecture of the City. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Colquhoun, A.: Typology and Design Method, Arena, 83: 11–14 Reprinted in Colquhoun A. Essays in Architectural Criticism: Modern Architecture and Historical Change. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Conroy-Dalton, R., Kirsan, C.: Small graph matching and building genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35(5), 810–830 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanna, S.: Spectral comparison of large urban graphs. In: Koch, D., Marcus, L., Steen, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hanna, S.: Defining Implicit Objective Functions for Design Problems. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2007. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laskari, S., Hanna, S., Derix, C.: Urban identity through quantifiable spatial attributes: Coherence and dispersion of local identity through the automated comparative analysis of building block plans. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A. (eds.) Design Computing and Cognition 2008. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Psarra, S., Grajewski, T.: Describing shape and shape complexity using local properties. In: Third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boden, M.A.: The creative mind: myths & mechanisms. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saunders, R., Gero, J.S.: Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. In: Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L. (eds.) Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 113–139. University of Sydney, Sydney (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hanna, S.: Where creativity comes from: the social spaces of embodied minds. In: Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L. (eds.) Proceedings of HI 2005, Sixth International Conference of Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Designs. University of Sydney, Sydney (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cropley, A.J.: Definitions of creativity. In: Runco, M.A., Pritzer, S.R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity, pp. 511–524. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Netherlands

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hanna, S. (2011). Design Agents and the Need for High-Dimensional Perception. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ’10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0509-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0510-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics