Skip to main content

Beyond the Design Perspective of Gero’s FBS Framework

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition ’10

Abstract

Among the various model based theories, the Gero’s FBS framework is acknowledged as a well-grounded, effective and tested reference for describing both analysis and synthesis design tasks. Despite its design-centric nature, the FBS model can provide a valid support also to represent processes and tasks beyond its original scope. The specific interest of the authors is to extend the FBS application to model also uses and misuses of objects, interpretations of the users, needs and requirements. In fact, as partially addressed also in literature, some issues arise when the classical FBS framework is adopted to model particular aspects such as the user’s role, values and needs, as well as to produce an explicit representation of failures and redundant functions. The full paper presents an extended classification of aspects, beyond the design perspective, which currently cannot be represented by the FBS model and some directions for its possible extension. Several examples clarify the scope and the characteristics of the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gero, J.S.: Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26–36 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: The situated function-behavior-structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373–391 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermaas, P.E.: The Flexible Meaning of Function in Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 2009), Stanford University, California, United States, August 24-27, vol. 2, pp. 113–124 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., Pardasani, A.: Collaborative conceptual design – state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design 34, 981–996 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R.: Function in device representation. Engineering with Computers 16, 162–177 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Erden, M.S., Komoto, H., van Beek, T.J., D’Amelio, V., Echavarria, V., Tomiyama, T.: A Review of Function Modeling: Approaches and Applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22, 147–169 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cascini, G., Fantoni, G., Montagna, F.: Reflections on the FBS model: proposal for an extension to needs and requirements modeling. Submitted to the International Design Conference - Design 2010, Dubrovnik - Croatia, May 17-20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: Understanding Innovation as Change of Value Systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IFIP Working Conference on Computer Aided Innovation (CAI), Harbin, China 20-21, pp. 38–50 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, Y.M., Britton, G.A., Tor, S.B.: Constraint-based functional design verification for conceptual design. Computer-Aided Design 32, 889–899 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, D.C., Blessing, L.: The relationship between function and affordance. In: DETC2005-85017, Long Beach, California, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, Inc. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vermaas, P.E.: The physical connection: engineering function ascriptions to technical artefacts and their components. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37(1), 62–75 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuipers, B.: Qualitative Reasoning: modeling and simulation with incomplete. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keuneke, A., Allemang, D.: Exploring the no-function-in-structure principle. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1, 79–89 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R.: Function in device representation. Engineering with Computers 16, 162–177 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaver, W.W.: Technology affordances. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology, pp. 79–84. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Del Frate, L., Franssen, M., Vermaas, P.E.: Towards defining technical failure for integrated product development. In: Proceedings of TMCE 2010 Symposium, Ancona, Italy, April 12-16, pp. 1013–1026 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becattini, N., Cascini, G., Rotini, F.: Correlations between the evolution of contradictions and the law of ideality increase. In: Proceedings of the 9th ETRIA/CIRP TRIZ Future Conference, Timisoara, Romania 4-6, pp. 26–34 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., Yoshikawa, H.: FBS Modeling: Modeling scheme of function for conceptual design. In: Proceedings of the 9th Int. Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Amsterdam, NL 11-19, pp. 271–278 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive Work Analysis, Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. IEC 61508-4 Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems - Part 4: Definitions and abbreviations. International Electrotechnical Commission (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. IEC 60812 Analysis Techniques for System Reliability Procedure for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). International Electrotechnical Commission (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maier, J.R.A., Fadel, G.M.: Affordance-based methods for design. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 3, pp. 785–794 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dallard, P., Fitzpatrick, A.J., Flint, A., Le Bourva, S., Low, A., Ridsdill Smith, R.M., Willford, M.: The London Millennium Footbridge. Structural Engineer 79(22), 17–33 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Netherlands

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cascini, G., Del Frate, L., Fantoni, G., Montagna, F. (2011). Beyond the Design Perspective of Gero’s FBS Framework. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ’10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0509-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0510-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics