Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Models and Modeling pp 121–139Cite as

The Molecular Workbench Software: An Innovative Dynamic Modeling Tool for Nanoscience Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 6))

Abstract

Nanoscience and nanotechnology are critically important in the twenty-first century (National Research Council, 2006; National Science and Technology Council, 2007). This is the field in which major sciences are joining, blending, and integrating (Battelle Memorial Institute & Foresight Nanotech Institute, 2007; Goodsell, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.design-simulation.com/ip/index.php

  2. 2.

    http://www.algodoo.com

  3. 3.

    http://www.crayonphysics.com

  4. 4.

    For instance, see Gromacs: http://www.gromacs.org

  5. 5.

    “We have become quantum mechanics – engineering and exploring the properties of quantum states. We’re paving the way for the future nanotechnicians.” — Donald M. Eigler, IBM Fellow

  6. 6.

    http://molecularworkbench.blogspot.com/2010/02/mwscript-javascript-interaction.html

References

  • American Chemical Society (2008). Statement on computer simulations in academic laboratories. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirouche, F. M. L. (2006). Fundamentals of multibody dynamics: Theory and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battelle Memorial Institute & Foresight Nanotech Institute (2007). Productive nanosystems: A technology roadmap. Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Linn, M. C., et al. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. Arlington, TX : National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourg, D. M. (2001). Physics for game developers. O’Reilly Media. Sebastopol, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, M. E., Rezepa, H. S., & Rezepa, D. R. (2005). The use of the free, open-source program Jmol to generate an interactive web site to teach molecular symmetry. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(11), 1736–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catto, E. (2007). Box2D. http://www.box2d.org. Accessed 4 Dec 2010.

  • Chang, R. P. H. (2006). A call for nanoscience education. Nano Today, 1(2) , 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colella, V. S., Klopfer, E., & Resnick, M. (2001). Adventures in modeling: Exploring complex, dynamic systems with StarLogo. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, K. E. (1988). Studying nanotechnology foresight briefing #1. From http://www.foresight.org/Updates/Briefing1.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2010.

  • Drexler, K. E. (1992). Nanosystems: Molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation (1st ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feurzeig, W., & Roberts, N. (1999). Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., et al. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010103–010110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, D. S. (2004). Bionanotechnology: Lessons from nature. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, A. (2009). Integrating nanoscience into the classroom: Perspectives on nanoscience education projects. ACS Nano, 3(4), 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isralewitz, B., Gao, M., & Schulten, K. (2001). Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 11, 224–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. (2010). Simulations in teaching physical chemistry: thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. Molecular modeling basics. http://molecularmodelingbasics.blogspot.com/2010/12/simulations-in-teaching-physical.html. Accessed on December 4, 2010.

  • José, T. J., & Williamson, V. M. (2005). Molecular visualization in science education: An evaluation of the NSF-sponsored workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(6), 937–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoursière, C. (2007). Ghosts and machines: Regularized variational methods for interactive simulations of multibodies with dry frictional contacts. Umeå: Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, A. R. (2001). Molecular modeling: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. R., & Liu, M. B. (2003). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: A meshfree particle method. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, March–April, 50–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2006). A matter of size: Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science and Technology Council. (2007). The national nanotechnology initiative strategic plan. Arlington, VA: National Nanotechnology Coordination Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSF Blue Ribbon Panel on SBES. (2006). Simulation-based engineering science: Revolutionizing engineering science through simulation. Washington, DC: NSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. (2004). Reasoning with atomic-scale molecular dynamic models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panoff, R. (2009). Simulations deepen scientific learning. ASCD Express, 4(19) . Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ascd_express/vol4/419_panoff.aspx. Accessed 3 Dec 2010.

  • Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, D. C. (1997). The art of molecular dynamics simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieth, M., & Schommers, W. (2006). Handbook of theoretical and computational nanotechnology (1st ed). Los Angeles, CA: American Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, E., & Moher, T. (2008). Instructional framing for nanoscale self-assembly design in middle school: A pilot study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March 24–28, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, J. (2003). Real-time fluid dynamics for games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Game Developer Conference. San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. N. (2000). Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate?. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), S37–S41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. E. Sweeney, & S. Seal (Eds.). (2008). Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education. Los Angeles, CA: American Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, E., Silva, B. L., Daly S., Wischow, E., Moher, T., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2008, June 23–28). Using construct-centered design to revise instruction and assessment in a nanoscale self-assembly design activity: A case study. Proceedings of the 8th international conference for the learning sciences (Vol. 3). Utrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, R., & Xie, Q. (2008). Applying computational science to education: The molecular workbench paradigm, computing in science and engineering. Computing in Science and Engineering, 10(5), 24–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, N., & Tsukada, M. (2000). Fast and stable method for simulating quantum electron dynamics. Physical Review E, 62(2), 2914–2923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322, 682–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories – An embodied modeling approach. Cognition & Instruction, 24(2), 171–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. K. (2003). Computational nanotechnology: Modeling and theory are becoming vital to designing and improving nanodevices. Chemical & Engineering News, 81(17), 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong-Ekkabut, J., Baoukina, S., Triampo, W., Tang, I.-M., Tieleman, D. P., & Monticelli, L. (2008). Computer simulation study of fullerene translocation through lipid membranes. Nature Nanotechnology, 3, 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C., & Pallant, A. (2009). Constructive chemistry: A case study of gas laws. Concord 13(2) , 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q., & Tinker, R. (2006). Molecular dynamics simulations of chemical reactions for use in education. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollman, D., Rebello, N. S., & Hogg, K. (2002). Quantum mechanics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number DUE-0802532.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Advanced Educational Modeling Laboratory, The Concord Consortium, Concord, MA, 01742, USA

    Charles Xie

  2. The Concord Consortium, Concord, MA, 01742, USA

    Amy Pallant

Authors
  1. Charles Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Pallant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Xie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bahrain Teachers College, Manama, Bahrain

    Myint Swe Khine

  2. Bahrain Teachers College, Manama, Bahrain

    Issa M. Saleh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xie, C., Pallant, A. (2011). The Molecular Workbench Software: An Innovative Dynamic Modeling Tool for Nanoscience Education. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) Models and Modeling. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation