Abstract
Models and modeling are of such importance in science that the appropriate un-derstanding of, and ability to use, models is seen by many authors as central to an under-standing of science (Gilbert & Boulter, 1998; Harrison & Treagust, 2000; Ramadas, 2009). In this chapter we consider key aspects of models and modeling. We begin by de-scribing the nature of models and modeling. We then discuss how models and modeling relate to the nature of science and scientific enquiry. This followed by a description of modeling as a cognitive tool and consideration of how models and modeling relate to the learning of science. We conclude the chapter by highlighting the areas of needed research in science education with respect to models and modeling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Science Education, 76(6), 581–595.
Baker, S. R., & Talley, L. (1972). The relationship of visualization skills to achievement in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 49(11), 775–776.
Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., & Finegold, M. (1995, April). Model perception among pre- and in-service chemistry teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Association for Research in Science Teaching Conference, San Francisco.
Bent, H. (1984a). Should orbitals be x-rated in beginning chemistry courses?. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(5), 421–423.
Bent, H. (1984b). Uses (and abuses) of models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(9), 774–777.
Besson, U., & Viennot, L. (2004). Using models at the mesoscopic scale in teaching physics: Two experimental interventions in solid friction and fluid statics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1083–1110.
Birk, J. P., & Abbassian, S. (1996). Teaching VSEPR: The plastic egg model. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(7), 636–637.
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95–117.
Brodie, T., Gilbert, J., Hollins, M., Roper, G., Robson, K., Webb, M., et al. (1994). Models and modelling in science education. Hatfield Herts: Association for Science Education.
Brunner, J. S. (1967). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Buty, C., & Mortimenr, E. F. (2008). Dialogic/authoritative discourse and modelling in high school teaching sequence on optics. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1635–1660.
Carr, M. (1984). Model confusion in chemistry. Research in Science Education, 14, 97–103.
Carr, M., & Oxenham, J. (1985). Model confusion in science. In R. Osborne, & J. Gilbert (Eds.), Some issues of theory in science education (pp. 81–88). Hamilton, New Zealand: Science Education Research Unit, University of Waikato.
Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon, & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Chiu, M.-E., Chou, C.-C., & Liu, C.-J. (2002). Dynamic processes of conceptual change: Analysis of constructing mental models of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 688–712.
Clark, R. (1973). Einstein: Life and times. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Clement, J. J. (1998). Expert novice similarities and instruction using analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1271–1286.
Coleman, S. L., & Gotch, A. J. (1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 206–209.
Coll, R. K. (1999). Learners’ mental models of chemical bonding. Unpublished doctor of science education thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.
Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198.
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, T. (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), 171–191.
Coll, R. K., Taylor, N., & Lay, M. C. (2009). Scientists’ habits of mind as evidenced by the interaction between their scientific training and religious beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 725–755.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ mental models of chemical bonding. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 357–382.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2002a). Learners’ mental models of covalent bonding. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 241–268.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2002b). Learners’ use of analogy and alternative conceptions for chemical bonding: A cross-age study. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48(1), 24–35.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Learners’ mental models of metallic bonding: A cross-age study. Science Education, 87(5), 685–707.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003a). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 464–886.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003b). Learners’ mental models of metallic bonding. Science Education, 87, 685–707.
Comba, P., & Hambley, T. W. (1995). Molecular modelling of inorganic compounds. New York: VCH.
Cosgrove, M. (1995). A study of science-in-the making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Teaching, 17(3), 295–310.
Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379–1401.
Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K., & Jones, A. (2003). The development of the Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649–668.
Develaki, M. (2007). The model-based view of scientific theories and the structuring of school science programmes. Science Education, 16(7-8), 725–749.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.
Eilam, B. (2004). Drops of water and of soap solution: Students’ constraining mental models of the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 970–993.
Falcão D., Colinvaux, D., Krapas, S., Querios, G., Alves, F., Cazelli, S., et al. (2004). A model-based approach to science exhibition evaluation: A case study in a Brazilian astronomy museum. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 951–978.
Fazio, C., Guastella, I., Sperandeo-Mineo, R., & Tarantino, G. (2008). Modelling mechanical wave propagation: Guidelines and experimentation of a teaching-learning sequence. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1491–1530.
Fensham, P. J., & Kass, H. (1988). Inconsistent or discrepant events in science instruction. Studies in Science Education, 15, 1–16.
Flores-Camacho, F., Gallegos-Cázares, L., Garritz, A., & García-Franco, A. (2007). Incommensurability and multiple models: Representations of the structure of matter in undergraduate chemistry students. Science Education, 16(7–8), 775–800.
Franco, C., de Barros, H. L., Colinvaux, D., Krapas, S., Queiroz, G., & Alves, F. (1999). From scientists’ and inventors’ minds to some scientific and technological products: Relationships between theories, models, mental models and conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 277–291.
Gabel, D., Briner, D., & Haines, D. (1992). Modelling with magnets: A unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, 59(3), 58–63.
Ganguly, I. (1995, October). Scientific thinking is in the mind’s eye. In Selected Readings from the annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 241–250). Chicago.
Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science Education, 14, 291–308.
Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2007). Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics. Science Education, 16(7–8), 849–881.
Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130.
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J. K., & Osborne, R. J. (1980). The use of models in science and science teaching. European Journal of Science Teaching, 2(1), 3–13.
Gilbert, J. K., & Rutherford, M. (1998a). Models in explanations Part 1: Horses for courses?. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83–97.
Gilbert, J. K., & Rutherford, M. (1998b). Models in explanations Part 2: Whose voice? Whose ears?. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 187–203.
Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (1997). The kinds of mental representations—models, propositions and images—used by college physics students regarding the concept of field. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 711–724.
Green, D. W. (1996). Models, arguments, and decisions. In J. Oakhill, & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science: Essays in honour of Phil Johnson-Laird (pp. 119–137). Hove: Psychology Press.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.
Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediate modelling in science education. Science Education, 16(7–8), 653–697.
Hansen, J. A., Barnett, M., MaKinster, J. G., & Keating, T. (2004). The impact of three-dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomical concepts: A quantitative analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1365–1378.
Harding, P., & Hare, W. (2000). Portraying science accurately in classrooms: Emphasizing open-mindedness rather than relativism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 225–236.
Harrison, A. G. (2008). Teaching with analogies: Friends or foes?. In A. G. Harrison, & R. K. Coll (Eds.), Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms (pp. 5–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harrison, A. G., & Coll, R. K. (Eds.). (2008). Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms (p. 270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harrison, A. G., & De Jong, O. (2005). Exploring the use of multiple analogical models when teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1135–1159.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models?. School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 420–429.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple model use in Grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352–381.
Harrison, A. G., & Coll, R. K. (Eds.). (2008). Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms (p. 270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harré, R. (1970). The principles of scientific thinking. London: Macmillan.
Harré R. (1978). Models in science. Physics Education, 13(5), 275–278.
Head, J., Bucat, R., Mocerino, M., & Treagust, D. (2005). Exploring students’ abilities to use two different styles of structural representation in organic chemistry. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology education, 591, 133–152.
Henze, I., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (2007). The change of science teachers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819–1846.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1996). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52(1), 35–44.
Jansoon, N., Coll, R. K., & Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding mental models of dilution in Thai Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 147–168.
Jansoon, N., Somsook, E., & Coll, R. K. (2008). Thai undergraduate chemistry practical learning experiences using the Jigsaw IV method. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 31(2), 178–200.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Mental models. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 469–499). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (1999). A cause of ahistorical science teaching: Use of hybrid models. Science Education, 83(2), 163–177.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ view on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.
Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: Promoting, characterizing and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549–573.
Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Yeary, S. A. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students’ developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299–1324.
Ke, J.-L., Monk, M., & Duschl, R. (2005). Learning introductory quantum physics: Sensori-motor experiences and mental models. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1571–1594.
Kline, M. (1985). Mathematics and the search for knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 751–773.
Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (vol. 1, pp. 121–146). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lin, J.-W., & Chiu, M.-H. (2007). Exploring the characteristics and diverse sources of students’ mental models of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 771–803.
Lopes, J. B., & Costa, N. (2007). The evaluation of modelling competencies: Difficulties and potentials for the learning of the sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 811–851.
Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2008). The use of computer-based programming environments as computer modelling tools in early science education: The cases of textual graphical program languages. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 287–323.
Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603–630.
Maksic, Z. B. (1990). Theoretical models of chemical bonding Part 1: Atomic hypothesis and the concept of molecular structure. New York: Springer.
Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by instructors. Science Education, 83(1), 33–54.
Matthews, M. R. (2007). Models in science and in science education: An introduction. Science Education, 16(7–8), 647–652.
Moore, W. J. (1989). Schrödinger: Life and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nakamoto, K. (2009). Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds: Theory and applications in inorganic chemistry (6th ed). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Nakhleh, M. B., Lowrey, K. A., & Mitchell, R. C. (1996). Narrowing the gap between concepts and algorithms in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(8), 758–762.
Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual-change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3–44). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2007). Effects of model-based teaching on pre-service physics teachers’ conceptions of the moon, moon phases and other lunar phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 555–593.
Oliva, J. M., Azcárate, P., & Navbarrete, A. (2007). Teaching models in the use of analogies as a resource in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 45–66.
Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204.
Peierls, R. (1980). Model-making in physics. Contemporary Physics, 21(1), 3–17.
Pestel, B. C. (1993). Teaching problem solving without modelling through “thinking aloud pair problem solving”. Science Education, 77(1), 83–94.
Pereira, M. P., & Pestana, M. E. M. (1991). Pupils’ representations of models of water. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 313–319.
Piburn, M. D., Reynolds, S. J., McAuliffe, C., Leedy, D. E., Birk, J. H., & Johnson, J. K. (2005). The role of visualization in learning from computer-based images. International Journal of Science & Education, 27(5), 513–527.
Portides, D. P. (2007). The relation between idealization and approximation in scientific model construction. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 699–724.
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843–1866.
Pribyl, J. R., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 229–240.
Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., Van Dreil, J., & Pilot, A. (2009). Selection of authentic modelling practices as contexts for chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1867–1890.
Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79(1), 37–61.
Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 301–318.
Rodley, G. A., & Reanny, D. C. (1977). The double helix revisited. Christchurch, New Zealand: Whitcoulls.
Saari, H., & Viiri, J. (2003). A research-based teaching sequence for teaching the concept of modelling to seventh-grade students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1333–1352.
Schrader, C. L. (1984). Everyone wants to be a model teacher Part I: Observations versus inferences. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(11), 1001–1002.
Shen, J., & Confrey, J. (2010). Justifying alternative models in learning astronomy: A study of K-8 science teachers’ understanding of frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 1–29.
Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 327–348.
Silva, C. C. (2007). The role of models and analogies in the electromagnetic theory: A historical case study. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 835–848.
Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Joolimngen, W. R. (2005). The difficult process of scientific modelling: An analysis of novices’ reasoning during computer-based modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1695–1721.
Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., van Joolingen, W. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). The relation between students’ epistemological understanding of computer models and their cognitive processing on a modelling task. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1205–1229.
Small, M. Y. & Morton, M. E. (1983). Spatial visualisation training improves performance in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13(1), 41–43.
Smit, J. J. A. & Finegold, M. (1995). Models in physics: Perceptions held by final-year prospective physical science teachers studying at South African universities. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 621–634.
Spiliotopoulou-Papantoniou, V. (2007). Models of the universe: Children’s experiences and evidence from the history of science. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 801–833.
Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (1993). When analogy is perceived as such. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1229–1239.
Suckling, C. J., Suckling, K. E., & Suckling, C. W. (1978). Chemistry through models: Concepts and applications of modelling in chemical science, technology and industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sutton, C. (1993). Figuring out a scientific understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1215–1227.
Taber, K. S. & Coll, R. K. (2002). Bonding. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 213–234). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tan, K. D. C., Taber, K. S., Liu, X., Coll, R. K., Lorenzo, M., Li, J., et al. (2008). Students’ conceptions of ionisation energy: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 263–283.
Taylor, I., Barker, M., & Jones, A. (2003). Promoting mental model building in astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1205–1225.
Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using metaphor for learning to improve students’ metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 222–259.
Tomasi, J. (1988). Models and modelling in theoretical chemistry. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem, 179, 273–291.
Trindle, C. (1984). The hierarchy of models in chemistry. Croatia Chemica Acta, 57(6), 1231–1245.
Tsai, C.-C., & Liu, S.-Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1621–1638.
Tuckey, H., Selvaratnam, M., & Bradley, J. (1991). Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(6), 460–464.
Ünal, S., Çalik, M., Alipaşa, A., & Coll, R. K. (2006). A review of chemical bonding studies: Needs aims, methods of exploring students’ conceptions, general knowledge claims and students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24(2), 141–172.
Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers’ knowledge of teaching and learning of models. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255–1272.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Pictures, representation, and the understanding. In R. S. Cohen, & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Models: Representation and the scientific understanding, Boston studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 48, pp. 175–187). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 153, 737–739.
Weller, C. M. (1970). The role of analogy in teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7(2), 113–119.
Wheeler, A. E., & Hill, D. (1990). Diagram-ease: Why students misinterpret diagrams. The Science Teacher, 57(5), 59–63.
Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 521–534.
Wong, E. D. (1993a). Self-generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluation explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 367–380.
Wong, E. D. (1993b). Understanding the generative capacity of analogies as a tool for explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1259–1272.
Wu, H.-K. (2010). Modelling a complex system: Using novice-expert analysis for developing an effective technology-enhanced learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 195–219.
Zumdahl, S. S., & Zumdahl, S. A. (2003). Chemistry (6th ed.). Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coll, R.K., Lajium, D. (2011). Modeling and the Future of Science Learning. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) Models and Modeling. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0448-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0449-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)