Abstract
Neurath’s holism, so characteristic for his thinking, contrasts with the general analytical trend of the Vienna Circle. All phenomena ought always to be considered in broader context, eventually in the context of a universal history of the cosmos. His theory of truth, discussed during the controversy over protocol sentences with Schlick and Neurath, is also holist in a specific sense: a statement is true if it can be integrated into a theory. In disagreement with the phenomenalist orientation of Carnap’s Logical Structure of the World (and with Poppers’s “pseudorationalism”) Neurath initiated the physicalist turn of the Vienna Circle. The physicalist language should be the universal language (“jargon”) of all sciences. Paradoxically, when physicists began to doubt about whether a unified language of macrophysics and microphysics was possible, Neurath linked the fate of physicalism with the latest developments of in physics. In spite of his ardent attacks against metaphysics, his position is rather ambivalent and the elimination of metaphysics seems more and more difficult. Another paradox: metaphysics consists of “isolated” sentences, but it has always assumed the function of developing a general synthesis of human knowledge. Finally, Neurath’s efforts aim at the elaboration of a unified science whose concrete realization is a series of scientific treatises, the Encyclopedia. Written in the universal physicalist language, it is fundamentally pluralistic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Köhler, E. (1985). Die Metaphysik beim Wiener Kreis. In Dahms, H.-J. (herausgegeben von), Philosophie, Wissenschaft, Auklärung. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Wirkung des Wiener Kreises. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Maxwell, J. C. (1991). Matter and Motion. New York, NY: Dover.
Neurath, O. (1981). In Haller, R., Rutte, H. (herausgegeben von), Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften, vol I and II. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempski.
Neurath, O. (1983). Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, edited and translated by Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Sebestik, J. (1999). Vorwort. Der Wiener Kreis und die Geschichte – Erkenntnistheorie und Wissenschaftsgeschichte im Werk Otto Neuraths. In Nemeth, E., Heinrich, R. (herausgegeben von), Otto Neurath: Rationalität, Planung, Vielfalt. Wien/Oldenburg/Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sebestik, J. (2011). Otto Neurath’s Epistemology and Its Paradoxes. In: Symons, J., Pombo, O., Torres, J. (eds) Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0142-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0143-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)