Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion ((HCPR,volume 4))

  • 1783 Accesses

Abstract

This book will survey the work of twentieth-century Continental philosophy and its potential impact on philosophy of religion as it is practised predominantly in English-speaking countries. The term “Continental philosophy,” insofar as it refers to religion, can be ascribed to a tradition of thought that dates from the time of Kant, resulting from the demise of natural theology, where it had been assumed that human beings could have knowledge of God. Other philosophers connected with this tradition who have specific association with the subject of religion, if not necessarily an affinity for it, are Hegel, Nietzsche, and Kierkegaard. In the first half of the twentieth century, the major philosophers identified with this philosophy are Husserl and Heidegger, and then, more recently, from the 1970s onwards, French thinkers such as Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault are included, as well as Luce Irigaray and Julia Kristeva. The Frankfurt school of critical theory, exemplified at the present time by the work of Jürgen Habermas, has also not been without some influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One of Gadamer’s more interesting statements in connection with religion concerns the unfortunate way it has used philosophy dogmatically. As a response, he states: “Yet, when modern philosophy begins to entrust itself to the ancient path of thought, perhaps thinkers will learn once again to discern the ancient content of the concept of God” (1999: 17).

  2. 2.

    I have written elsewhere on some of the problems that I have discerned in the early adaptations of phenomenology to more theological purposes, and the problems this created in Religious Studies (Joy 2004).

Bibliography

  • Anderson, Pamela. 1997. A feminist philosophy of religion: The rationality and myths of religious belief. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Angela Alles, 2009. The divine in Husserl and other explorations, Vol. 98, Analecta Husserliana, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, Walter H. 1995. Religious studies: The making of a discipline. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, James D. 1967. The emergence of philosophy of religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, Benjamin D. 2006. Heidegger’s religious origins: Destruction and authenticity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, and Ludwig Binswanger. 1993 [1954]. Dream and existence. In Studies in existential psychology and psychiatry, ed. Keith Hoeller, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1976 [1962]. Mental illness and psychology. (Based on Maladie mentale et psychologie) (trans: Sheridan, Alan). New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberry, Nancy. 1998. Philosophy of religion in different voices. In Philosophy in a feminist voice: Critiques and reconstructions, ed. J.A. Kourany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1999. Hermeneutics, religion & ethics (trans: Weinsheimer, Joel). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, James G. 1986. A precis of an Husserlian philosophical theology. In Essays In phenomenological theology, ed. S. Laycock and J.G. Hart. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1976. Only a god can save us: Der Spiegel’s interview with Martin Heidegger. Philosophy Today 20: 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicaud, Dominique. 2006. Phenomenology “wide open”: After the French debate (trans: Cabral, Charles C.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantzen, Grace. 1999. Becoming divine: Towards a feminist philosophy of religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, Morny. 2000. Beyond a god’s-eye view: Alternative perspectives in the study of religion. In Perspectives on method and theory in the study of religion, ed. A. W. Geertz and R. McCutcheon, 110–140. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, Morny. 2004. Philosophy and religion. In New approaches to the study of religion. Vol. 1. Regional, critical and historical approaches, ed. P. Antes, A. Geertz, and R.A. Warne, 185–217. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, Stephen. 1988. Foundations for a theological phenomenology. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Eugene T. 2000. Twentieth century western philosophy of religion 1900–2000. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, Rudolf. 1957. The idea of the holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschke, Carl. 1982. The deconstruction of god. In Deconstruction and theology, ed. Thomas J.J. Altizer, Max A. Myers, Carl A. Raschke, Robert P. Scharlemann, Mark C.Taylor, and Charles E. Winquist. New York, NY: Crossroads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. Husserl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalow, Frank. 2001. Heidegger and the quest for the sacred: From thought to the sanctuary of faith. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen, Michael. 1986. The other: Studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and Buber (trans: Macann, C.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, David. 1990. On the origin of the philosophy of religion: The need for a new narrative for its founding. In Myth and philosophy, ed. F. Reynolds and D. Tracy, 11–36. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leeuw, Geradus. 1963. Religion in essence and manifestation. 2 Vols. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, Ben. 2007. Heidegger’s philosophy of religion: From god to gods. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morny Joy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joy, M. (2011). Introduction. In: Joy, M. (eds) Continental Philosophy and Philosophy of Religion. Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0059-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics