Abstract
This chapter provides an introduction to the background to recent reforms for financing SGEI, known as the ‘Almunia package’. It traces the reaction to the Altmark ruling from the European Commission and the European Courts and sets the legal and political debate on how to finance SGEI in its modern economic and constitutional context. The chapter introduces and summarises the arguments made in the subsequent chapters of the book.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest, OJ 2012 C 8/4; Communication from the Commission, European Union framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, OJ 2012 C 8/15.
- 2.
Commission Decision of 20 December on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, OJ 2012 L 7/3.
- 3.
Draft Commission Regulation on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid granted to undertakings providing services of general economic interest, O. J. 2012 C 8/23.
- 4.
Commission Regulation on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid granted to undertakings providing services of general economic interest, OJ 2012 L 114/8.
- 5.
- 6.
The idea of a quality framework, avoiding binding legislation, was mooted by the Commission as part of the initial ideas for modernising the single/internal market: European Commission, services of general interest, including social services of general interest: a new European commitment COM (2007) 725 final. See the chapter by Maxian Rusche.
- 7.
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/State_aid/legislation/sgei.html. Articles were also published in the Competition Policy Newsletter 2012:1: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cpn/cpn_2012_1_en.html.
- 8.
- 9.
State aid: Commission adopts new rules on services of general economic interest (SGEI) IP/11/1571, 20/12/2011. For an early application of the new package see: State aid SA.33054 (2012/N)—United Kingdom Post Office Limited (POL): Compensation for net costs incurred to keep a non-commercially viable network for the period 2012–2015 and the continuation of a working capital facility, C(2012) 1905 fin. 28 March 2012.
- 10.
Joaquín Almunia Vice President of the European Commission responsible for Competition Policy, ‘The State Aid Modernisation Initiative’, speech at The State Aid Modernisation Initiative EStALI—European State Aid Law Institute 10th Experts' Forum on New Developments in European State Aid Law Brussels, 7 June 2012. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/12/424&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en (last accessed on 1 August 2012).
- 11.
CJEU, Case 280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v. Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003]ECR I-7747.
- 12.
Mario Monti, A New Strategy for the Single Market, At the Service of Europe’s Economy and Society, Report to the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, May 9 2010.
- 13.
Bauby 2011. On special measures for transport see the chapter by Maxian Rusche and Schmidt.
- 14.
- 15.
See Szyszczak 2007, Chap. 1.
- 16.
Davies and Szyszczak 2011.
- 17.
Szyszczak 2012b.
- 18.
Szyszczak 2004.
- 19.
Baquero Cruz 2002.
- 20.
The availability of Article 106(2) TFEU as a derogation or justification from the free movement rules is contentious, see Bekkedal 2011. See the strict interpretation of when Article 106(2) TFEU can apply in relation to a free movement of capital (golden shares) infringement: CJEU, Case C-543/08 Commission v. Portugal [2010] ECR I-0000.
- 21.
European Commission, Green Paper on Services of General Interest, COM (2003) 270 final (21 May 2003); European Commission, White Paper on Services of General Interest, COM (2004) 374 final (12 May 2004).
- 22.
European Commission, Green Paper on Services of General Interest, COM (2003) 270 final (21 May 2003); European Commission, White Paper on Services of General Interest, COM (2004) 374 final (12 May 2004).
- 23.
CJEU, Case C-280/00 Altmark [2003] ECR I-7747.
- 24.
Also termed ‘conditions’ by some commentators.
- 25.
CJEU, Case C-280/00 Altmark [2003] ECR I-7747, adopting a compensation approach following the earlier ruling in CJEU, Case C-53/00 Ferring v ACOSS [2001] ECR I-9067. For background on the vacillation between a State aid and compensation approach in the earlier case law and Commission policy see Szyszczak 2004.
- 26.
An application of this condition is seen Commission Decision Energy Supply Slovenia, OJ 2007 L 219/9, paras 111ff where the Commission was satisfied that Slovenia had chosen an option that did not strictly fulfil the fourth criterion but was the option which incurred the least cost for the State.
- 27.
See, for example, GC, Case T-289/03 BUPA v Commission [2008] ECR II-81. Cf Klasse 2009, who argues that Article 106(2) TFEU is restricted to assessing a possible over-compensation where psc is evaluated, whereas the Altmark criteria apply a stricter regime, requiring also a judgment of efficiency.
- 28.
Hancher and Larouche 2011.
- 29.
Szyszczak 2011.
- 30.
Commission, Commission Decision of 28 November 2005, C(2005) 2673 on the Application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State Aid in the Form of Public Service Compensation Granted to Certain Undertakings Entrusted With the Operation of Services of General Economic Interest, OJ 2005 L 312/67.
- 31.
Community Framework for State Aid in the Form of Public Service Compensation, OJ 2005 C 297/4.
- 32.
Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings OJ 2006 L 318/17.
- 33.
State aid: Commission provides greater legal certainty for financing services of general economic interest, Press Release IP/05/937, Reference: MEMO/05/258 Date: 15/07/2005. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/05/937&format=HTML&aged=0%3Cuage=EN&guiLanguage=en. Of particular significance are the reasons set out as to why social services are excluded from the State aid rules.
- 34.
See Szyszczak 2012b.
- 35.
GC, T-289/03 BUPA v. Commission [2008] ECR II-81.
- 36.
CJEU, Case C-53/00 [2001] ECR I-9067.
- 37.
Cf. Szyszczak 2011.
- 38.
GC, T-289/03 [2008] ECR II-81.
- 39.
Hancher and Larouche 2011, p. 765.
- 40.
Hancher and Larouche 2011, p. 764. See also Sauter and van de Gronden 2011, p. 618. Who state that the GC substantially amended the Altmark criteria and that it, by moderating the fourth criterion, called into question the strict efficiency approach that the Commission adopted in four healthcare decisions.
- 41.
Ross 2009, p. 138.
- 42.
CJEU, Joined Cases C-341/06 P and C-342/06 P Chronopost II [2008] ECR I-4777.
- 43.
For more detailed discussion of the constitutional significance of these changes to the basic Union Treaties and their use in soft law see Szyszczak 2012c.
- 44.
The Treaty of Lisbon 2009 recognised for the first time the role of subnational governments in the Union, see: Article 4(2) TEU; Protocol No. 2, Articles 2, 5; Article 5(3) TEU.
- 45.
COM (2007) 724 final; COM (2007) 725 final, COM (2007) 726 final.
- 46.
Mario Monti, A New Strategy for the Single Market. At the Service of Europe’s Economy and Society. Report to the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, 9 May 2010, 73. (The Monti Report).
- 47.
The Application of EU State Aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest since 2005 and the Outcome of the Public Consultation, SEC (2011) 397.
- 48.
The Application of EU State Aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest since 2005 and the Outcome of the Public Consultation, SEC (2011) 397.
- 49.
See Szyszczak 2012b.
- 50.
Reform of the EU State Aid Rules on Services of General Economic Interest, COM (2011) 146 final.
- 51.
Resolution A7 0371/2011 of 24 October 2011.
- 52.
Opinion COR/2011/150, OJ 2011 C 259/40.
- 53.
Opinion EESC/2011/1008, OJ 2011 C 248/149.
- 54.
Recital 4.11 of Opinion EESC/2011/1008; Recitals 12 to 14 of Opinion COR/2011/150.
- 55.
Opinion COR/2011/27, OJ C 9 of 11 January 2012, p. 45. See Lambertz and Hornung 2012.
- 56.
- 57.
The conference proceedings edited by Messola 2011. They were available on the College of Europe web pages at the time of writing (1 August 2012):
http://www.coleurope.eu/content/gclc/documents/GCLC%20-%20SGEI%20Conference%20Booklet.pdf.
- 58.
SEC (2011) 1581.
- 59.
Commission Regulation on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid granted to undertakings providing services of general economic interest, OJ 2012 L/8.
- 60.
European Commission Press Release IP/12/402, State aid: Commission adopts de minimis Regulation for SGEI, 25 April 2012.
- 61.
Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest, OJ 2012 C 8/4.
- 62.
See the earlier: European Commission, Guide to the application of the European Union rules on State aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest, SEC (2010) 1545, Brussels, 7 December 2010 (a document of 84 pages).
- 63.
- 64.
See paras 12 and 14.
- 65.
See, for eg, paras 13 (on in-house provision of services) and 37 (exclusive rights and hybrid markets). On stating that in-house provision has no particular relevance for the economic nature of an activity the Commission bases its interpretation not on CJEU case law but on its Decision 2011/501/EU Verkersverbund Rhein Ruhr, OJ 2011 L210/1.
- 66.
See CJEU, Case C-280/00 Altmark [2003] ECR I-7747.
- 67.
Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006, OJ 1998 L 379/5.
- 68.
See for example, CJEU, Case C-179/90 Merci convenzionali porto di Genova [1991] ECR I-5889, para 27.
- 69.
Communication from the Commission Community Guidelines for the application of State Aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks, OJ 2009 23/7.
- 70.
Hancher and Larouche 2011, p. 24.
- 71.
See GC, Case T-17/02 Fred Olsen [2005] ECR II- 2031, para 188.
- 72.
OJ 2004 L 134/114.
- 73.
OJ 2004 L 134/1.
- 74.
Commission Decision of 20 December on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, OJ 2012 L 7/3.
- 75.
Commission, Commission Decision of 28 November 2005, C(2005) 2673 on the Application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State Aid in the Form of Public Service Compensation Granted to Certain Undertakings Entrusted With the Operation of Services of General Economic Interest, OJ 2005 L 312/67.
- 76.
Communication from the Commission, European Union framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, OJ 2012 C 8/15.
- 77.
For discussion of the modernisation programme see Ølykke et al. 2012.
- 78.
See Neergaard et al. 2012.
- 79.
Supra n 2.
- 80.
References
Bauby P (2011) From Rome to Lisbon: SGIs in primary law. In: Szyszczak E et al (eds) Developments in services of general economic interest. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Bacquero Cruz J (2002) Between competition and free movement. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bekkedal T (2011) Article 106 TFEU is dead. Long live Article 106 TFEU! In: Szyszczak E et al (eds) Developments in services of general economic interest. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Buendía Sierra JL (1999) Exclusive rights and state monopolies under EC Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Buendía Sierra JL (2012) A turn of the screw, comment on the Almunia package on the blog ‘chilling competition’, http://chillingcompetition.com/2012/03/14/a-turn-of-the-screw-jl-buendia-on-sgeis/
Davies J, Szyszczak E (2011)’ Universal service obligations: fulfilling new generations of services of general economic interest’. In: Szyszczak E et al. (eds.) Developments in services of general economic interest, TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Van de Gronden JW, Szyszczak E, Neergaard U, Krajewski M (eds) (2011) Health care and EU law. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Hancher L, Larouche (2011) Community, state and market. In: Craig P, De Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hancher L, Sauter W (2012) EU competition and internal market law in health care. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jääskinen N (2011) The new rules on SGEI, EStAL, 599
Lambertz K-H, Hornung M (2012) State aid rules on services of general economic interest: for the committee of the regions the glass is half-full ESTAL 329
Klasse M (2009) Services of general economic interest Ch 7. In: Heidenhain M (ed) European State aid law Verlag Ch Beck/Hart. Munich & Oxford, Munich
Messola M (ed) (2011) The reform of State aid rules on services of general economic interest: from the 2005 Monti-Kroes package to the 2011 Almunia Package. College of Europe, Bruges
Neergaard U, Szyszczak E, van de Gronden J, Krajewski M (eds) (2012) Social services of general interest in the EU. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Ølykke G, Risvig C, Tvarnø C (eds) (2012) EU public procurement-modernisation, growth and innovation. DJØF, Copenhagen
Regner E (2011) Reform of the legal framework for services of general interest: where do we stand? What should a reform look like? ESTAL 597
Ross M (2009) Article 16 E.C. and services of general economic interest: from derogation to obligation? ELRev 25 22
Sauter W, Van de Gronden J (2011) State aid, services of general economic interest and universal service in healthcare. ECLRev 32(12):615
Sinnaeve A (2012) What’s new in SGEI in 2012?—An overview of the commission’s SGEI package ESTAL 347
Szyszczak E (2004) Financing of services of general economic interest. MLR 67:982
Szyszczak E (2007) The regulation of the state in competitive markets in the European Union. Hart, Oxford
Szyszczak E (2011) Altmark assessed. In: Szyszczak E (ed) Research handbook on European State aid law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Szyszczak E (2012a) Modernising State aid and the financing of SGEI. JCL&P 3:332
Szyszczak E (2012b) Soft law and safe havens. In: Neergaard U, Szyszczak E, Van de Gronden J, Krajewski M (eds) Social services of general interest in the EU. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Szyszczak E (2012c) Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object? Fordham INT’L L.J. 35:1364
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 T.M.C. Asser Press, the Hague, the Netherland, and the authors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szyszczak, E. (2013). Introduction. In: Szyszczak, E., van de Gronden, J. (eds) Financing Services of General Economic Interest. Legal Issues of Services of General Interest. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-906-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-906-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands
Print ISBN: 978-90-6704-905-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-6704-906-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)