Skip to main content

The Role of Uncertainties in Aeolian Risk Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 22))

Abstract

The design of slender structures subject to wind actions must take into account many sources of uncertainty in the environmental parameters that describe the wind field at the site, in the structural mechanical properties, and in the parameters that influence the interaction phenomena. For the sake of simplicity, three types of uncertainty can be distinguished: (i) aleatory uncertainty, related to the natural variability of the parameters and their unpredictability; (ii) epistemic uncertainty, related both to the lack of information and to the errors of experimental measures; (iii) model uncertainty, related to the choice of the models of wind actions, structural dynamic response and interaction phenomena. In this paper, the relevance of the different sources of uncertainty is discussed and illustrated with reference to an example case. In detail, the effects on the risk assessment of a long span suspension bridge induced by the uncertainty of the model of the aeroelastic forces are investigated. The study is aimed at the development of a general framework for Performance-Based Wind Engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Augusti, G., Borri, C., Neumann, H.-J.: Is Aeolian risk as significant as other environmental risks? Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74, 227–237 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kareem, A.: Wind effects on structures: a probabilistic viewpoint. Probab. Eng. Mech. 4(2), 166–200 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simiu, E., Scanlan, R.H.: Wind Effects on Structures: Fundamentals and Applications to Design, 3rd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Augusti, G., Ciampoli, M.: Performance-based design in risk assessment and reduction. Probab. Eng. Mech. 23, 496–508 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrini, F., Ciampoli, M., Augusti, G.: Performance-based wind engineering: risk assessment of a long span suspension bridge. In: Esteva L. (ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems IFIP WG 7.5, Toluca, Mexico, 6–9 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes, J.D.: Wind Loading of Structures, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luco, N., Cornell, C.A.: Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 23(2), 357–392 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, Y.L., Liu, T.T., Zhang, W.S.: Buffeting-induced fatigue damage assessment of a long suspension bridge. Int. J. Fatigue 31, 575–586 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mann J., Kristensen L., Jensen N.O.: Uncertainties of extreme winds, spectra and coherence. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Bridge Aerodynamics, Copenhagen, Denmark, 10–13 May 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ciampoli, M., Petrini, F., Augusti, G.: Performance-based wind engineering: towards a general procedure, Submitted to Structural Safety (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bontempi, F.: Basis of design and expected performances for the Messina Strait Bridge. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bridge Engineering – Challenges in the 21st Century, Hong Kong, China, 1–3 Nov 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carassale, L., Solari, G.: Monte Carlo simulation of wind velocity field on complex structures. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 94, 323–339 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pecora, M., Lecce, L., Marulo, F., Corio, D.P.: Aeroelastic behaviour of long span bridges with “multibox” type deck sections. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 18, 343–358 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrini, F., Giuliano, F., Bontempi, F.: Comparison of time domain techniques for the evaluation of the response and the stability in long span suspension bridges. Comput. Struct. 85, 1032–1048 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caracoglia, L., Jones, N.P.: Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck section. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91, 371–402 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lazzari, M., Vitalini, R.V., Saetta, A.V.: Aeroelastic forces and dynamic response of long-span bridges. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 60, 1011–1048 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruno, L., Khris, S.: The validity of 2D numerical simulations of vortical structures around a bridge deck. Math. Comput. Modell. 37, 795–828 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Petrini F., Giuliano F., Bontempi F.: Modeling and simulations of aerodynamic in a long span suspension bridge. In: Augusti G., Schueller G.I., Ciampoli M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability ICOSSAR’05, Rome, Italy, 19–23 June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diana, G., Falco, M., Bruni, S., Cigada, A., Collina, A.: Risposta di un ponte a grande luce al vento turbolento: confronto tra simulazioni numeriche e risultati sperimentali (in Italian). In: Proceedings of the 3rd IN-VENTO Conference, Rome, Italy, 19–21 Oct (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Diana, G., Falco, M., Bruni, S., Cigada, A., Larose, G.L., Damsgaard, A., Collina, A.: Comparison between wind tunnel tests on a full aeroelastic model of the proposed bridge over Stretto di Messina and numerical results. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 54/55, 101–113 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zasso, A.: Flutter derivatives: Advantages of a new representation convention. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 60, 35–47 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lungu, D., Rackwitz, R.: Joint Committee on Structural Safety – Probabilistic Model Code, Part 2: Loads. http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/ (2001). Accessed 2 Apr 2010

  23. Solari, G., Piccardo, G.: Probabilistic 3-D turbulence modelling for gust buffeting of structures. Probab. Eng. Mech. 16, 73–86 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper has been developed within the Wi-POD Project (2008–2010), partially financed by the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR). Fruitful discussions with Prof. Franco Bontempi are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Ciampoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petrini, F., Ciampoli, M., Augusti, G. (2011). The Role of Uncertainties in Aeolian Risk Assessment. In: Papadrakakis, M., Stefanou, G., Papadopoulos, V. (eds) Computational Methods in Stochastic Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9987-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9987-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9986-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9987-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics