Skip to main content

Political and Commercial Interests in the BSE Inquiry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 483 Accesses

Abstract

The account of the reasoning of BSE scientists in Chapters 4, 5, and 6 has emphasised logical and epistemic features of argument to the exclusion of a vast range of other factors that have an influence on the reasoning process. These factors, which include psychological states and emotions as well as a range of vested interests, are as significant determinants of the reasoning process as are the logical factors that have traditionally been the focus of study by theorists of reasoning. In the context of the UK’s BSE epidemic, two main types of interest were never far from the risk assessments and other decisions arrived at by scientists. These interests included political considerations of various shades and the concerns of commercial organisations connected to the British beef industry. The role of these interests during the BSE crisis varied from that of directly influencing scientific decision-making and other judgements to creating contexts in which only certain views and opinions could be readily expressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Copi IM, Cohen C (2009) Introduction to logic, 13th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton DN (1997) Appeal to expert opinion: arguments from authority. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Suich JC (1987) Bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Letter to Mr LG Faulkner, British Embassy, The Hague, 30 October 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings L (2005) Giving science a bad name: politically and commercially motivated fallacies in BSE inquiry. Argumentation 19 (2):123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battersby M (2006) Applied epistemology and argumentation in epidemiology. Informal Logic 26 (1):41–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (1997) Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understand Sci 6 (3):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey RW (1998) The BSE inquiry statement no. 10. Statement of Professor Richard Lacey, 4 March 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilesmith JW (1993) Professor Lacey’s article: BSE – the gathering crisis. Letter to Mr R Bradley, 18 May 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1990) Press release by the Chief Medical Officer on the safety of beef, 16 May 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley R (1994b) Dr Stephen Dealler’s visit to CVL. Letter to Mr TED Eddy (AHDC Tolworth), Mr KC Taylor (AHWV Tolworth), Dr JA Morris (CVL), Mr JW Wilesmith (CVL), 15 April 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert MA (1997) Coalescent argumentation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels D (2005) Editorial: scientific evidence and public policy. Am J Public Health 95 (S1):S5–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams BM (1987) A case of spongiform encephalopathy in the bovine. Letter to Mr R Hancock, VI Centre, 13 May 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton DN (2008) Informal logic: a pragmatic approach. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (2004) Belief in the law of small numbers. In: Shafir E (ed) Preference, belief and similarity: selected writings by Amos Tversky, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods J, Walton DN (1974) Argumentum ad verecundiam. Philosophy and Rhetoric 7 (3):135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer RJ (1996) Possible collapse of the beef market. Letter to the Minister, 18 March 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Agriculture Committee (1990) Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN, Byrne RMJ (1991) Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguin E (2000) The UK BSE crisis: strengths and weaknesses of existing conceptual approaches. Sci Public Policy 27 (4):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley R (1990) Dr Stephen Dealler. Letter to Dr CJ Gibbs. National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA, 25 July 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberlin RH (1990) Transmissible encephalopathies in animals. Can J Vet Res 54 (1):30–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Cummings .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cummings, L. (2010). Political and Commercial Interests in the BSE Inquiry. In: Rethinking the BSE Crisis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9504-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9504-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9503-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9504-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics