Abstract
In our 1998 volume The Politics of Chemical Risk: Scenarios for a Regulatory Future we envisioned four ideal-typical scenarios for the future of European chemicals policies. The scenarios focused on the nature of expertise (seen either as a universal or a localised phenomenon) and the organisation of the boundary between science and policy (as either diverging or converging). The four scenarios were titled International Experts, European Risk Consultation, European Coordination of Assessment, and Europe as a Translator. For all four scenarios, we hypothesised internal dynamics and articulated dilemmas related to the development of the sciences contributing to chemical assessment, the relation between the EU and member states and the role of the public. In this contribution, we look back on our four scenarios 15 years later, to see which ones have materialised and to explore whether the dilemmas we saw have indeed surfaced. We conclude that the International Experts scenario by and large has materialised and explore some of the underlying tensions and dynamics in this development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bal, R. (1998) Boundary Dynamics in Dutch Standard Setting for Occupational Chemicals. In R. Bal and W. Halffman (Eds.), The politics of chemical risk: scenarios for a regulatory future (pp. 75–103). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bal, R. (1999) Grenzenwerk: Over het organiseren van normstelling voor de arbeidsplek (Vol. 6). Twente: Twente University Press.
Bal, R., and Halffman, W. (Eds.). (1998) The Politics of Chemical Risk: Scenarios for a Regulatory Future. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chapman, A. (2007) Democratizing Technology: Risk, Responsibility and the Regulation of Chemicals. London: Earthscan.
Committee on toxicity of chemicals in food, C.P.A.T.E. (2002) Risk assessment of mixtures of pesticides and similar substances. London: Food Standards Agency.
Gezondheidsraad. (2002) Blootstelling aan combinaties van stoffen. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
Halffman, W. (2003) Boundaries of Regulatory Science: Eco/toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England, and the Netherlands, 1970-1995. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Halffman, W. (2009). Republican Chemicals (Review of Anne Chapman, Democratizing Technology, London: Earthscan 2007). Journal of Risk Research, 12(7– 8), 1035–1037.
Halffman, W., and Bal, R. (1998) The politics of chemical risk: Scenarios for regulatory policy. In R. Bal and W. Halffman (Eds.), The Politics of Chemical Risk (pp. 303-322). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hartung, T., and Rovida, C. (2009) Chemical regulators have overreached. Nature, 460(27 August), 1080–1081.
Health Council of the Netherlands. (2004) Pesticides in food: assessing the risk to children. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
Perrow, C. (1999) Normal Accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halffman, W., Bal, R. (2010). Regulatory Futures in Retrospect. In: Eriksson, J., Gilek, M., Rudén, C. (eds) Regulating Chemical Risks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9427-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9428-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)