Skip to main content

Ethological Zoosemiotics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 820 Accesses

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 5))

Abstract

Ethological zoosemiotics, as seen in Chapter 1, is the primary and the most classical field of inquiry for zoosemiotics, i.e., the one that actually deals with the semiosic processes occurring among animals. It was also mentioned that the field can be divided into an early stage (eEZ) and a modern one (mEZ). In its early phase, zoosemiotics was mostly conceived as an umbrella term for gathering different approaches on animal communication. And “communication” was still the key-word, as in this stage there was a clear emphasis on this specific process, rather than the broader semiosis. Classical ethology and the then very trendy behaviouristic schools, finally, provide the scientific framework for (and document the uncertain semiotic identity of) this type of EZ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a thorough description of vervet monkeys’ calls, see Cheney and Seyfarth (1990).

  2. 2.

    Not only, anyway. Language in non-human animals can be studied also in a purely ethological dimension, and that has been particularly recurrent in the field of avian communication: “there is ample justification for speaking of bird utterances as language” (Armstrong 1963: 27).

  3. 3.

    “Among other things, if Nagel was right, not only we could not understand a bat, but other humans either, since we could not interpret their personal perspective anyway. However, it seems that we do understand each other – at least sometimes, so how can Nagel be right?” (Cimatti 2001: personal communication, in Martinelli 2006a).

  4. 4.

    Semiotically speaking, to have a mind implies at least the capacity of (1) guiding one’s own behaviour from the “inside”, on the basis of projects not directly connected with what happens outside; and (2) elaborating and transforming such representations.

  5. 5.

    One may wonder why shiny feathers are a handicap. The answer is that a “shiny” bird is more likely to be located by predators, but – at the same time – it is the predator herself that soon recognises the prey as a fit one, thus very often renouncing to hunt her.

  6. 6.

    Half seriously, it could be said that the people listening to Von Karajan's version of Le sacre du printemps are satisfying an aesthetic wish; the latter makes them feel good; the fact of feeling good helps them to work well; if they work well then they are not fired; if they keep their job, they still make money; finally, if they have money, they can satisfy the primary need of hunger.

  7. 7.

    Fouts was interviewed by Dario Martinelli during the preparation of Martinelli (2002).

  8. 8.

    Some other species of the same genus erect cone-shaped maypoles around a tree, that may end up being higher than a human being. Pergolates are so skilfully built that their discoverer – the Italian naturalist Ottaviano Beccari, around the end of nineteenth century – at first thought he was dealing with dollhouses built by creative young girls.

References

  • Piaget J (1962) Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimatti F (1998) Mente e linguaggio negli animali. Carrocci, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Mâche F-B (1992) Music, myth and nature. Harwood, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Partan S, Marler P (1999) Communication goes multimodal. Science 283(5406):1272–1273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani JC, Marler P (1989) A phonological analysis of male gibbon singing behavior. Behaviour 109(5):20–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong EA (1963) A study of bird song. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainardi D (ed) (1992) Dizionario di etologia. Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RW (1990) A theory of play. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Interpretation and explanation in the study of animal behaviour. Westview, Boulder, CO, pp 197–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83:435–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen JM (1972) Some principles of animal communication. In: Hinde RA (ed) Non-verbal communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (1977) The structure of animal communication sounds. In: Bullock TH (ed) Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • San Martin J, Pintos ML (2001) Animal life and phenomenology. In: Crowell S, Lester E, Samuel JJ (eds) The reach of reflection: the future of phenomenology. Electronpress. Electronic publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1962) Mankind evolving: the evolution of the human species. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1974) Animal architecture. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA (1990) Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto Semiotic Circle, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Nollman J (1999) The charged border. Henry Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1976) A theory of play and fantasy. In: Bruner JS, Jolly, A, Sylva, K (eds) Play: its role in development and evolution. Basic Books, New York, pp 119–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith CD, Frith U (1999) Interacting minds: a biological basis. Science 286:1692–1695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick GTW (1916) The psychology of relaxation. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA (1981) The play of musement. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol CX-LIV:517–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (1959) Beyond the pleasure principle. (trans: Strachey J) Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson R (1960) Concluding statement: linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok TA (ed) Style in language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 350–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco U (1968) La struttura assente. Bompiani, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotavalta O (1956) Analysis of the song patterns of two sprosser nightingales, luscinia luscinia. Annales Zoologici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae ‘Vanamo’ 17(4): –31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA, Danesi M (2000) The forms of meaning. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldis O (1975) Play fighting. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Groos K (1898) The play of animals. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nöth W (1990) Handbook of semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson KV (1998) Self assessment in juvenile play. In: Bekoff M, Byers JA (eds) Animal play: evolutionary, ecological, and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–204

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt GM (1984) On the origins of play. In: Smith P (ed) Play: in animals and humans. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 5–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA (1979) The sign and its masters. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouts RS (1999) Next of kin. William Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maran T (2008b) Towards an integrated methodology of ecosemiotics: the concept of nature-text. Sign Syst Stud 35(1/2):269–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Frings H, Frings M (1964) Animal communication. Blaisdell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson R (1963) Essais de linguistique générale. Minuit, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead GH (1934) Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 282–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn E (ed) (1983) Multimodal convergences in sensory systems. Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne C (1973) Born to sing: an interpretation and world survey of bird song. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailman JP (1977) Optical signals. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembrock G (1963) Acoustic behaviour of mammals. In: Busnel RG (ed) Acoustic behaviour of animals. Elsevier, London, pp 751–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V, Goldman A (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends cogn sci 2:493–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg D (2005) Why birds sing. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA (1972) Perspectives in zoosemiotics. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WJ (1991) Animal communication and the study of cognition. – In: Ristau CR, Griffin DR (eds) Cognitive ethology: the minds of animals: essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffin. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli D (2002) How musical is a whale? – towards a theory of zoömusicology. International Semiotics Institute, Helsinki/Imatra

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits B (1977) Words on play. J PhilosoSport 4:117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembrock G (1971) Biokommunikation. Akademic, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JG (1984) Syntactic structures in the vocalizations of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys, Cebus olivaceus. Behaviour 90:46–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer H (1873) The principles of psychology. Appleton, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallasmaa J (ed) (1995) Eläinten Arkkitehturi. Suomen Rakennustaiteen Museo, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier JW, Bunk T (1992) Biology of animal behavior. Mosby-Year, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (1984) Animal communication: affect or cognition? In: Scherer KR, Ekman P (eds) Approaches to emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 345–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1976) Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In: Bruner JS, Jolly A, Sylva K (eds) Play: its role in development and evolution. Basic Books, New York, pp 537–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin D (1976) The question of animal awareness. Rockefeller University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike K (1954) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour, vol I. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Glendale, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Martinelli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martinelli, D. (2010). Ethological Zoosemiotics. In: A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics:. Biosemiotics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9249-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics