Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of various approaches that exist within the field of environmental education (EE). Like science education, environmental education is an interdisciplinary and complex field that offers a multitude of strategies for learning, dependent on the variables of resources, time, space, curriculum, student characteristics, plus a full range of factors that can affect any kind of educational implementation. Seven approaches are briefly described: EE and the schoolyard; place-based education; the Projects curricula (PLT, WILD, and WET) and Population Connection; science and EE in nature centers, zoos, and museums; investigating and evaluating environmental issues and actions; action research and EE; and the Science-Technology-Society approach to EE. Each of these approaches individually addresses several important goals of EE, but none of these is totally prescriptive or comprehensive. There are many different EE teaching and learning approaches one can select from. It is up to the individual educator to select and apply the approach that will be most effective in specific settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aikenhead, G. (2003, August). Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) 2003 Conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061. Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Museums. (2009). What is a museum? Retrieved June 16, 2009, from http://www.aam-us.org/aboutmuseums/whatis.cfm

  • American Chemical Society. (2002). ChemCom: Chemistry in the community. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Forest Foundation. (2008). Project Learning Tree: Pre-K environmental education activity guide. Washington, DC: American Forest Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broda, H. W. (2007). Schoolyard enhanced learning: Using the outdoors as an instructional tool K – 8. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (2009). A garden in every school. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/Ls/nu/he/garden.asp

  • Center for Place-Based Education. (2008). What is place-based education? Retrieved October 5, 2009, from http://www.anei.org/pages/99_place_based_education.cfm

  • College of William and Mary Center for Gifted Education. (1997). Acid, acid everywhere: A problem-based unit. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Environmental Education. (2008a). Project WILD: K-12 curriculum and activity guide. Houston, TX: Council for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Environmental Education. (2008b). Project WILD Aquatic K-12 curriculum & activity guide. Houston, TX: Council for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin-Jones, L. L. (2000). The effectiveness of schoolyards as sites for elementary science instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1959). School and society. In M. Dworkin (Ed.), Dewey on education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, W. F. (1994). Action within schools. In L. V. Bardwell, M. C. Monroe, & M. T. Tudor (Eds.), Environmental problem solving: Theory, practice and possibilities in Environmental Education (pp. 40–48). Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, N. C., & Yager, R. E. (Eds.). (1981). What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: Nation Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R., Litherland, R. A., Volk, T. L., Ramsey, J. M., & Peyton, R. B. (2003). Investigating and evaluating environmental issues and actions: Skill development modules: A curriculum development project designed to teach students how to investigate and evaluate science-related social issues. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R., Peyton, R. B., & Wilke, R. J. (1980). Goals for curriculum development in Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(3), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R., Volk, T. L, & Ramsey, J. M. (1990). Science-Technology-Society: Investigating and evaluating STS issues and solutions. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • It’s About Time. (2002). EarthComm earth system science in the community. Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, W. H., & Penick, J. E. (2003). Biology: A community context. Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine Department of Education. (2007). Maine learning results: Parameters for essential instruction. Retrieved February 17, 2009, from http://www.maine.gov/education/lres/pei/index/html

  • Marcinkowski, T. J. (1988). An analysis of correlates and predictors of responsible environmental behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1988). Proquest Dissertations, AAT 8903716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. C. (2003). The influence of outdoor schoolyard experiences on students’ environmental knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and comfort levels. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association. (1990). NSTA position statement on Science/Technology/Society: A new effort for providing appropriate science for all. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/sts.aspx

  • Natural Science for Youth Foundation. (1990). Natural science centers: Directory and NSYF blue ribbon reports from the Natural Science for Youth Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED319 619)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. J., & Hungerford, H. R. (1981). Developmental variables affecting environmental sensitivity in professional Environmental Education. In A. B. Sacks, L. A. Iozzi, & R. J. Wilke (Eds.), Current issues in environmental education and environmental studies (pp. 111–113). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Connection. (2009). Teaching materials and tools. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://www.populationeducation.org/

  • Sadler, K. C., Smith-Walters, C., Ring, T., & Lasater, M. (2006). Thinking outside the box: No child left inside at Campus School. In Exemplary science in grades PreK–4: Standards-based success stories. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. R. (1989/1990). Predictors of responsible environmental behavior in three Wisconsin conservation organizations. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 584–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, W. B., & Wals, A. E. J. (1994). An action research approach to environmental problem solving. In L. V. Bardwell, M. C. Monroe, & M. T. Tudor (Eds.), Environmental problem solving: Theory, practice and possibilities in Environmental Education (pp. 51–65). Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Watercourse & Council for Environmental Education. (2007). Project WET. Bozeman, MT: The Watercourse & Council for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, K. (1994, April). Study nature, not books: The nature study curriculum 1891–1932. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED37400)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1978, September). The Tbilisi declaration. Connect: UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter, 3(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-UNEP. (1976, January). The Belgrade charter. Connect: UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter, 1(1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J., Beringer, A., & Stapp, W. B. (1990). Education in action: A community problem-solving program for schools. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigginton, E. (Ed.). (1971–2004). Foxfire (Vol. 1–12). New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, A. A., Volk, T. L., & Hungerford, H. R. (1994). Issue investigation and action training: An instructional model for EE. In L. V. Bardwell, M. C. Monroe, & M. T. Tudor (Eds.), Environmental problem solving: Theory, practice and possibilities in Environmental Education. Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, A. A., Volk, T. L., & Shrock, S. A. (2002). Teacher decision making in the 1st year of implementing an issues-based EE program: A qualitative study. Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyzga, M. C. (1995). Homes for wildlife. Concord, NH: New Hampshire Fish and Game Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E., & Akcay, H. (2008). Comparison of student learning outcomes in middle school science classes with an STS approach and a typical textbook dominated approach. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(7), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, S. O., Lim, G., & Yager, R. E. (2006). The advantages of an STS approach over a typical textbook dominated approach in middle school science. School Science & Mathematics, 106(5), 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Austin A. Winther .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1:

Representative Programs Providing Training and Support for Educational Use of Schoolyards

There are several programs available to provide support and training for teachers interested in using their schoolyards as learning sites. Some examples include:

  • The National Wildlife Federation Schoolyard Habitat Program – http://www.nwf.org/schoolyard/. This program provides encouragement, rationale, and examples of how to develop school grounds as wildlife habitats.

  • Many states have a “Homes for Wildlife” program. These are usually administered through a state’s Fish and Game Department or Department of Conservation or Natural Resources. New Hampshire has developed an excellent guide that has been adapted by many states for their specific ecosystem (Wyzga 1995).

  • Project Learning Tree’s Greenworks! grant program can provide grants for environment-related service learning projects. Information available at: http://www.plt.org/cms/pages/21_22_18.html

  • The Maryland Association for Environmental and Outdoor Education – http://www.maeoe.org/habitat/. This organization provides support and training for teachers interested in schoolyard habitat projects.

  • The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – http://www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay/schoolyd.htm. This government organization coordinates schoolyard habitat programs with state agencies and school districts to promote the development of school grounds as wildlife habitats. They provide resources, training, and funding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winther, A.A., Sadler, K.C., Saunders, G. (2010). Approaches to Environmental Education. In: Bodzin, A., Shiner Klein, B., Weaver, S. (eds) The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9222-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics