Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural Inheritance and Male and Female Fertility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Male Fertility Patterns and Determinants

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis ((PSDE,volume 27))

  • 556 Accesses

Abstract

Taking a coevolutionary approach, this chapter examines how cultural inheritance affects male and female fertility. The coevolutionary approach argues that similar to genes, cultural traits inherited from parents rather than other non-parental sources lead to a greater resemblance in evolutionary outcome between parents and offspring. If the fertility transition is considered as part of the evolutionary process, then it is expected that the fertility outcome of offspring and parents are more similar if offspring inherit cultural traits directly from parents. Following this rationale, in the regime of declining fertility, offspring who inherit cultural traits from parents are expected to have a higher fertility. Using data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) Cycle 6, this chapter investigates the capability of the coevolutionary theory in explaining male and female fertility. The results show that if religion is considered as a cultural trait, then the cultural inheritance hypothesis proposed by coevolutionary theory is generally supported by empirical evidence. That is, individuals who reported the same religious affiliations as those of their parents tend to have a greater number of children than those who reported different religions than those of their parents. Such a positive effect of cultural inheritance on fertility does not vary by gender. These findings contribute to the existing fertility literature in several aspects, which will be discussed in the conclusion and discussion part of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alford, J., Funk, C., & Hibbing, J. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S. (2003). The adaptive nature of culture. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12(3), 136–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, B. N. (2004). Patterns of intended and actual fertility among sub-groups of foreign-born and native-born Latinas. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1973). Fertility control and the problem of voluntarism. Paper presented at the Scientists and World Affairs, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. & Trussell, J. (1984). What are the determinants of delayed childbearing and permanent childlessness in the United States? Demography, 21(4), 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boling, P. (2008). Demography, culture, and policy: Understanding Japan’s low fertility. Population and Development Review, 34(2), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, M. O. M. (1989). The income-fertility relationship: Effect of the net price of a child. Demography, 26(2), 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, T., McGue, M., Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Genetic and environmental influences and personality correlates. Twin Research, 2(2), 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz, W. P. & Ward, M. P. (1979). Will US fertility remain low? A new economic interpretation. Population and Development Review, 5(4), 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, L. L. (1996). Infanticide in early modern Japan? Demography, culture, and population growth. Journal of Asian Studies, 5(1), 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (1995). Is there a role for culture in human behavioral ecology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(3), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Martin, N. G., & Heath, A. C. (1990). Religious affiliation in twins and their parents – testing a model of cultural inheritance. Behavior Genetics, 20, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C., Echevarria, S., & Smith, B. (2005). Religion and abortion attitudes among U.S. Hispanics: Findings from the 1990 Latino national political survey. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M. V. (1997). Culture and the evolution of social learning. Evolution And Human Behavior, 18(1), 23–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Whelpton, P. K., & Smith, J. W. (1961). Socio-economic factors in religious differentials in fertility. American Sociological Review, 26(4), 608–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurecki-Tiller, M. (2004). The influence of religion on childbearing: Fertility, reproductive biology and belief in the church of Jesus Christ of latter-day saints. Unpublished Dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Lancaster, J. B., Tucker, W. T., & Anderson, K. G. (2002). Evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility. American Journal of Human Biology, 14(2), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. L. (1968). Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London: Methuen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. J. & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1997). Explaining fertility transitions. Demography, 34(4), 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. & Bumpass, L. (1988). Intergenerational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 130–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W. D., Johnson, D. P., & Horn, M. C. (1986). Religion and fertility in the United States: The importance of marriage patterns and hispanic origin. Demography, 23(3), 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. & Cohn, R. (1977). The relation of income to fertility decisions in Taiwan. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 25(2), 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (2003). Fertility and distorted sex ratios in a rural Chinese county: Culture, state, and policy. Population and Development Review, 29(4), 595–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poston, D. L. (2000). Social and economic development and the fertility transitions in Mainland China and Taiwan. Population and Development Review, 26(Supplement), 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, P., & Swicegood, G. (1988). First birth in America. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. R. (1988). Does biology constrain culture. American Anthropologist, 90(4), 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singley, S. G. & Landale, N. S. (1998). Incorporating origin and process in migration fertility frameworks: The case of Puerto Rican women. Social Forces, 76(4), 1437–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (1993). Economic security, culture and fertility: A reply to Cleland. Population Studies, 47(2), 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornto, A. (1978). The relationship between fertility and income, relative income, and expected well-being. In J. Simon (Ed.), Research in population economics (Vol. I). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. C. (1991). From Provinces into Nations: Demographic integration in Western Europe, 1870–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2008). Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female fertility. Demographic Research, 18(8), 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University, 923 West Franklin Street, Richmond, VA, 23284-2028, USA

    Dr. Li Zhang

Authors
  1. Dr. Li Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, L. (2011). Cultural Inheritance and Male and Female Fertility. In: Male Fertility Patterns and Determinants. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8939-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation