Abstract
Dynamics in the housing market can be simulated using agent-based modelling. Focusing on the theme of urban regeneration, we present a housing market model framework which explores the causal relationships that occur in this market.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguilera, A., & Ugalde, E. (2007). A spatially extended model for residential segregation. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. doi:10.1155/2007/48589.
Benenson, I. (2004). Agent-based modeling: From individual residential choice to urban residential dynamics. In M. F. Goodchild & D. G. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science: Examples in best practice (pp. 67–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Black, S. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 578–599.
Blau, J. (2000). Group enmity and accord: The commercial press in three American cities. Social Science History, 24(2), 395–413.
Boehm, T. (1982). A hierarchical model of housing choice. Urban Studies, 19(1), 17–31.
Böheim, R., & Taylor, M. P. (1999). Residential mobility, housing tenure and the labour market in Britain (ILR working papers 035). London: Institute for Labour Research.
Bridge, G. (2002). The neighbourhood and social networks (Centre for Neighbourhood Research, Paper, 4). CNR: London.
CCSR (The Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research). (2010). The Samples of Anonymised Records (SARS) [online]. Accessed June 8, 2010. Available from http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/sars/2001/hhold/variables/
Cho, Y. (2004). Who moves and where? A comparison of housing association tenants in London and northern regions. In Housing corporation sector studies 40. London: Housing Corporation.
Cho, Y., Lyall Grant, F., & Whitehead, C. (2004). Affordable housing in London: Who expects to move and where? In Housing Corporation Sector Studies 39. London: Housing Corporation.
Dieleman, F. (2001). Modelling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(3), 249–265.
Gibbons, S., & Machin, S. (2003). Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 197–219.
Gjessing, M. (2009). Interview with René Jordan. December 11, 2009. Leeds.
Johnston, R. J., Poulsen, M. F., & Forrest, J. (2002). Are there ethnic enclaves/ghettos in English cities? Urban Studies, 39, 591–618.
Jordan, R., Birkin, M., & Evans, A. (2011). Agent-based simulation modelling of housing choice and urban regeneration policy. In T. Bosse, A. Geller, & C. Jonker (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation XI (pp. 152–166). Berlin: Springer.
Kim, J., Pagliara, F., & Preston, J. (2005). The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour. Urban Studies, 42(9), 1621–1636.
Laurie, A., & Jaggi, N. (2003). The role of ‘vision’ in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the Schelling segregation model. Urban Studies, 40(13), 2687–2704.
Leeds City Council. (2007). East and south east Leeds area action plan: Leeds local development framework. Leeds: Leeds City Council.
Mullins, D., & Murie, A. (2006). Housing policy in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pancs, R., & Vriend, N. (2007). Schelling’s spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1–24.
Peach, C. (1999). London and New York: Contrasts in British and American models of segregation. International Journal of Population Geography, 5, 319–351.
Phillips, D. (1998). Black minority ethnic concentration, segregation and dispersal in Britain. Urban Studies, 35(10), 1681–1702.
Phillips, D. (2007). Ethnic and racial segregation: A critical perspective. Geography Compass, 1(5), 1138–1159.
Power, A., & Mumford, K. (1999). The slow death of great cities? Urban abandonment or urban renaissance. York: York Publishing Services Limited.
Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 488–493.
Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.
Strand, S. (2002). Pupil mobility, attainment and progress in Key Stage 1: A study in cautious interpretation. British Education Research Journal, 28, 63–78.
Tu, Y., & Goldfinch, J. (1996). A two-stage housing choice forecasting model. Urban Studies, 33(3), 517–537.
Tunstall, R. (2003). ‘Mixed tenure’ policy in the UK: Privatization, pluralism or euphemism? Housing, Theory and Society, 20, 153–159.
Yin, L. (2009). The dynamics of residential segregation in Buffalo: An agent-based simulation. Urban Studies, 46(13), 2749–2770.
Zhang, J. (2004a). A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3), 147–170.
Zhang, J. (2004b). Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(4), 533–550.
Acknowledgements
Census output is Crown copyright and is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jordan, R., Birkin, M., Evans, A. (2012). Agent-Based Modelling of Residential Mobility, Housing Choice and Regeneration. In: Heppenstall, A., Crooks, A., See, L., Batty, M. (eds) Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8926-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8927-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)