Skip to main content

Combining Proximal and Penetrating Soil Electrical Conductivity Sensors for High-Resolution Digital Soil Mapping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Proximal Soil Sensing

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Proximal ground conductivity sensors produce high spatial resolution maps that integrate the bulk electrical conductivity (ECa) of the soil profile. For meaningful interpretation, variability in conductivity maps must either be inverted to profile conductivity or be directly calibrated to profile properties. Penetrating apparent electrical conductivity (ECa–P) sensors produce high depth resolution data at relatively fewer spatial locations. The objectives of this research were to (i) investigate the profile source of ECa in claypan soils via a detailed examination of ECa–P profiles; (ii) examine the potential for feature detection with ECa–P in claypan soils; and (iii) determine if ECa sensors can be calibrated to ECa–P features. Two study areas were chosen representing the claypan soils of north-east Missouri, USA. Profile conductivity was measured at high depth resolution on soil cores using a miniaturised Wenner conductivity probe and in the field using a conductivity penetrometer. Proximal ground conductivity was mapped with one direct contact sensor and two non-contact sensors, providing five distinct coil/electrode geometries. Increasing ECa–P was observed below the claypan, correlated with decreasing clay and water content and increasing bulk density. Depth to the claypan was successfully calibrated to derivative peaks on ECa–P profiles (R 2 = 0.72, p < 0.001). Relationships between ECa and ECa–P features were poor (R 2∼ 0.21) to good (R 2∼ 0.87) on a field-specific basis. Results show that ECa–P can be used for calibration of ECa to the depth to claypan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture, University of Missouri, or University of Florida.

References

  • Abdu H, Robinson DA, Jones SB (2007) Comparing bulk soil electrical conductivity determination using the DUALEM-1S and EM38-DD electromagnetic induction instruments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:189–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callegary JB, Ferre TPA, Groom RW, (2007) Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. Vadose Zone J 6:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL Lesch SM, (2005) Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 46:11–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond PE, Christy CD, Lund ED (2005) Using an automated penetrometer and soil EC probe to characterize the rooting zone. [CD-ROM]. In: Robert PC et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on precision agriculture, Minneapolis, MN, July 16–19, 2000, ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolittle JA, Sudduth KA, Kitchen NR, Indorante SJ (1994) Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods. J Soil Water Conserv 49(6):572–575

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JD (1980) Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurements at low induction numbers. Geonics technical note TN-6, Mississauga, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth KA, Hummel JW, Kitchen NR, Drummond ST (2000) Evaluation of a soil conductivity sensing penetrometer. 2000 ASAE international meeting, Milwaukee, WI, July 9–12. Paper no. 001043, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth KA, Kitchen NR (2006) Increasing information with multiple soil electrical conductivity datasets. 2006 ASABE international meeting, Portland OR, July 9–12. Paper no. 061055, ASABE St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.B. Myers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Myers, D. et al. (2010). Combining Proximal and Penetrating Soil Electrical Conductivity Sensors for High-Resolution Digital Soil Mapping. In: Viscarra Rossel, R., McBratney, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Proximal Soil Sensing. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8859-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics