Skip to main content

Remote Sensing and Integration with Other Geomatic Techniques in Archaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Satellite Remote Sensing

Part of the book series: Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing ((RDIP,volume 16))

Abstract

It’s a fact that today archaeologists can interact ever more closely with the modern sciences of surveying, which as a whole may fall under the name of Geomatics. A scientific approach to Archaeology may be in fact reflected in the first place in the adoption of methods, both objective and based on rigorous criteria and tools, for knowing and describing the goods. Remote Sensing, as a technique for surveying a site from a distance by means of special detectors and using management methods based on mathematical and physical models, is by nature a practical expression of this phenomenon, whether it is meant in the most common meaning of use of satellite data or extending its acceptation to aerial photogrammetry. The paper will review some of the issues related to the use of Remote Sensing in the archaeological context, but particularly in relation to other disciplines of Geomatics; Remote Sensing is not, as noted, a technique that is “self contained” and restricted in its scientific and technical areas independently, but it relies on the wealth of other techniques and scientific fields, and they must fit perfectly, especially for applications in Archaeology which have by nature a highly multidisciplinary vocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams M, Hook S, Ramachandran B (2002) ASTER users handbook, version 2. EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck A, Philip G, Abdulkarim M, Donoghue D (2007) Evaluation of Corona and Ikonos high resolution satellite imagery for archaeological prospection in western Syria. Antiquity 81:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitelli G, Girelli VA (2009) Metrical use of declassified satellite imagery for an area of archaeological interest in Turkey. J Cult Herit 10S:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitelli G, Zanni M (2005) Use of Ikonos high resolution imagery in archaeology: the example of the ancient city of Bakchias in Egypt. In: Oluic M (ed) New strategies for European Remote Sensing. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitelli G, Carrara A, Gusella L (2005) Evaluation and use of DEMs derived from ASTER imagery. In: Proceedings workshop Italy – Canada 2005 “3D digital imaging and modeling: applications of heritage industry medicine and land”, CD-Rom, Padova, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyuksalih G, Jacobsen K (2007) Comparison of DEM generation by very high resolution optical satellites. In: Bochenek Z (ed) New developments and challenges in remote sensing. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 627–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana S, Forte M (2006) In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on remote sensing in archaeology: from space to place, British Archaeological Reports, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng P, Chaapel C (2010) WorldView-2 satellite – Pan-sharpening and geometric correction. GeoInformatics 13(4):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Galiatsatos N, Donoghue DNM, Philip G (2008) High resolution elevation data derived from stereoscopic CORONA imagery with minimal ground control: an approach using Ikonos and SRTM data. Photogramm Eng Rem S 74(9):1093–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusella L, Adams BJ, Bitelli G, Huyck CK, Mognol A (2005) Object oriented image understanding and post-earthquake damage assessment for the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21(S1):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano A, Welch R, Lang H (2003) Mapping from ASTER stereo image data: DEM validation and accuracy assessment. ISPRS J Photogramm 57:356–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen K (2005) Analysis of digital elevation models based on space information. In: Oluic M (ed) New strategies for European Remote Sensing. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 439–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang HR, Welch R (1999) Algorithm theoretical basis document for ASTER digital elevation models, version 3.0. (http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov)

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2006) On the potential of Quickbird data for archaeological prospection. Int J Remote Sens 27(15–16):3607–3614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2008) Advances on remote sensing for archaeology and cultural heritage management. In: Proceedings of the 1st International EARSeL workshop Aracne, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Menze BH, Sherratt AG (2006) Detection of ancient settlement mounds: archaeological survey based on the SRTM terrain model. Photogramm Eng Rem S 72:321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli D, Remondino F, Dolci C (2004) Use of satellite imagery for DTM extraction, landscape modeling and GIS applications. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on processing and visualization using high-resolution imagery, Pitsanulok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollar I, Tabbagh A, Hesse A, Herzog I (2009) Archaeological prospecting and remote sensing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutin T (2001) Geometric processing of Ikonos Geo images with DEM. In: ISPRS joint workshop “High resolution mapping from space”, Hanover, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittuari L (2008) Precise global georeferencing of sites and geodetic techniques for morphological surveys within a common reference frame. In: ARCHAIA. Guidelines on research planning, characterisation, conservation and management in archaeological sites, British Archaeological Reports International Series, BAR S1877, 59–65, Archaeopress, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman J, El-Baz F (2008) Remote sensing in archaeology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Bitelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bitelli, G. (2012). Remote Sensing and Integration with Other Geomatic Techniques in Archaeology. In: Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. (eds) Satellite Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics