Skip to main content

Making Science Relevant: Conceptual Change and the Politics of Science Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 2))

Abstract

The present is a commentary on the previous four chapters that collectively make up this section of the book (“Positions and Perspectives”). As such, I have selected one major theme common to the four contributions to discuss its relevance to the field of science education research. In addition, I articulate (or bring forth) an issue that I believe was missing in all four texts. My intention is to provide readers with something that they have not yet encountered in any of the pieces individually—at least not as explicit as they will here. Ultimately, the present chapter contemplates another aspect of what has been carefully laid out on the prospect of re-uniting psychological and sociological perspectives within the context of conceptual change. Thus, I am supplementing and deepening the conversation amongst all four pieces that were intentionally positioned in this part of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Wu, N. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323, 586–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1991). Three dialogues on knowledge. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 23 (pp. 209–254). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkup, G. (2002). Identity, communityCommunity (of practice) and distributed learning Learning. In M.R. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 182–195). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H.R. (1963). The responsible selfSelf. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental cultureCulture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, G., Guimarães-Iosif, R., & Reis, J. (2009). Media and environmental education: Making school relevant. Txt: Leituras Transdiciplinares de Telas e Textos [Txt-Transdiciplinaries Readings of Canvas and Texts] (Accessed August 13, 2009 at http://www.letras.ufmg.br/atelaeotexto/artigo_canada.html)

  • Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning science: A singularSingularpluralSingular singular plural perspective. Rotterdam: SenseSense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Breaking the spell: Science education for a free society. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education for/as socio-political action (pp. 65–91). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R., & Berman, T. (2006). Living stories: Designing story-based educational experiences. NarrativeNarrative Inquiry, 16, 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaningMeaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (2001). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking (pp. 31–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reis, G. (2010). Making Science Relevant: Conceptual Change and the Politics of Science Education. In: Roth, WM. (eds) Re/Structuring Science Education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3996-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics