Abstract
Professional development (PD) designed to accompany curriculum materials prepares teachers for specific classroom practices, guides them during practice, and creates opportunities for reflection. We present the theoretical underpinnings for our model of curriculum-linked PD and describe a hybrid (face-to-face and online) professional development program for curriculum materials that make use of the My World™ Geographic Information System software. Research-derived design principles for curriculum-aligned PD include the following: (1) identify goals for the professional development, (2) adopt a learning theory and use it, and (3) evaluate whether learning goals were met and then revise PD practices according to this feedback. We do not intend our design to be the model for online PD, but rather an example of an approach successfully applying our design principles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Audet, R., & Paris, J. (1997). GIS implementation model for schools: Assessing the critical concerns. Journal of Geography, 96(6), 293–300.
Blakeslee, T., & Kahan, J. (1996). Michigan curriculum framework: Science education guidebook (PDF Document). Lansing, MI: State of Michigan.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. (2006). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Edelson, D. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385.
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 391–450.
Edelson, D. C., Schwille, K., Bruozas, M., Lach, M., Taber, M., Gordin, D. N., et al. (2005). Investigations in environmental science: A case-based approach to the study of environmental systems. Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.
Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.
Kali, Y., Linn, M. C., & Roseman, J. E. (Eds.). (2008). Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kent, A. M. (2004). Improving teacher quality through professional development. Education, 124(3), 427–436.
Kerski, J. J. (2001). A national assessment of GIS in American High Schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(1), 72–85.
Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information system technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102, 128–137.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483–497.
Kubitskey, B. (2006). Extended professional development for systemic curriculum reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kubitskey, B., & Fishman, B. (2005, April). Untangling the relationship(s) between professional development, practice, student learning and teacher learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Kubitskey, B., & Fishman, B. (2006, April). Professional development design for systemic curriculum change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2003, April). The relationship between professional development and student learning: Exploring the link through design research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2004). Impact of professional development on a teacher and her students: A case study. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, San Diego.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, H.-T. (2008). Exploring the role of showing design intent in supporting curriculum modifications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.
Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student teacher/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427–462.
McClurg, P., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Staff Development Council. (2001). NSDC standards for staff development.
Richardson, V. (2000). Alexis De Toqueville and the dilemmas of professional development. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED479531). Retrieved from ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) database.
Richardson, V. (2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 401.
Rivet, A. E. (2004). Contextualizing instruction: Connecting to urban students’ ideas and experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Selwyn, N. (2000). Creating a “connected” community? Teachers’ use of an electronic discussion group. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 750–778.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Singer, J., Marx, R. W., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36–48.
Supovitz, J. A., Mahyer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331–356.
Watkins Jr., T. D. (2003). Approval of the update of professional development vision and standards for Michigan educators (PDF Document). Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Education. Retrieved March 21, 2004, from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/ProfDevStdsVISWStrategies_4_9_03_C61067__A62638_12_09_02_62686_7.pdf
Acknowledgments
The work described in this chapter was funded by the National Science Foundation under grants ESI-0455582, REC-9876150, ESI-0227557, and 0352478, and by the National Geographic Education Foundation. The opinions reported in this work are those of the authors and not the funding agencies or their institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., Johnson, H., Mawyer, K., Edelson, D. (2014). Curriculum-Aligned Professional Development for Geospatial Education. In: MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Barnett, M. (eds) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3930-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3931-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)