Abstract
Let me briefly talk about science advising in the Nixon Administration. I will draw some conclusions from my experiences there. I have put these in the form of vignettes, brief accounts of events regarding such issues as politics versus science and engineering, also the representative aspect of the science advisor’s job, the ways of science and political thought and the differences, the lack of compatibility between science and politics, and the narrow line between intellectual integrity and political expediency. Then, too, I have some comments on Presidential attitudes toward science. Let me say that I will mention the names of several persons involved in such matters. But I don’t mean to criticize their honesty, integrity, or capabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
David, E. (2010). Science, Politics and Policy in the Nixon Administration. In: Pielke, R., Klein, R. (eds) Presidential Science Advisors. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3898-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3898-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3897-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3898-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)