Abstract
Since 1997 the autonomous government of Catalonia (Spain) and the public universities have been using a new quality instrument – a four-year programme-contract. The initiative was driven by a need to optimise higher education costs and increase universities’ responsiveness to societal needs. In order to achieve these goals, the government attempted to vitalize university management and bring the attention to the issues of efficiency and quality in universities’ operation. The contract constitutes a set of targets for improving academic quality and efficiency in a university. The strength of the instrument lies in the fact that it combines government control with institutional autonomy. While the government can steer the system in a desired direction by setting priorities, universities retain their freedom to develop their individual profile and strategies. The main challenge of the system has to do with the difficulties of designing clear and quantifiable policy objectives, and obtaining the commitment of university actors to meet these objectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chevaillier, T. (1998). Moving away from central planning: Using contracts to steer higher education in France. European Journal of Education, 33(1), 65–76.
DURSI (nd). Ministry of Universities, Research and the Information Society, Government of Catalonia. www10.gencat.net/dursi. Accessed 4 February 2009.
Höltta, S. (1998). The funding of universities in Finland: Towards goal-oriented government steering. European Journal of Education, 33(1), 55–63.
Jongbloed, B., Vossensteyn, H. (2001). Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 127–145.
Mora, J-G. (2004). A decade of quality assurance in Spanish universities. In S. Schwarz, D. F. Westerheijden (eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.
Neave, G., van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vilalta, J.M., Brugué, J. (2010). Contracting for Quality Improvement and Financing in Public Universities of Catalonia, Spain. In: Dill, D., Beerkens, M. (eds) Public Policy for Academic Quality. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3753-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3754-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)