Critics from the Nordic countries played a significant role in the development of the philosophies of the Vienna Circle. By the time the first English-language monograph-length critical study of Viennese neopositivism (Weinberg 1936) was published—as well as A. J. Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic (1936)—several critical studies by philosophers from Sweden and Finland were already gathering dust: Eino Kaila’s Der logische Neupositivismus (1930), Åke Petzäll’s Logistischer Positivismus (1931) and his Zum Methodenproblem der Erkenntnislehre (1935). With their authors having participated in the meetings of the Circle, these early monographs mirror the development of Viennese neopositivism as few other critical monographs do. Kaila focussed on the philosophical methodology and the doctrines adopted in Carnap’s Der logische Aufbau der Welt (1928). His arguments were discussed in the Circle’s meetings and Carnap published a friendly review (1930) in which he nevertheless rejected Kaila’s criticisms, in particular of the method of quasi-analysis. Petzäll also seems to have regarded an Aufbau-style Konstitutionssystem as the ideal type of Viennese neopositivism, but he rather focussed on the difficulties to find a version of the empiricist meaning criterion that not only all members of the Vienna Circle could agree to, but also was able to withstand critical attention. His first monograph reached the sceptical conclusion that verificationism was caught in a paradox.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ayer, Alfred J. (ed.), 1959, Logical Positivism, New York: Free Press.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1928, Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Bernary, trans. The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press, repr. Chicago: Open Court, 2004
Carnap, Rudolf, 1931, [Review] “E. Kaila, Der logistische Neupositivismus”, Erkenntnis 2, 75–7.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1932a, “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache” (1932a), Erkenntnis 2, 219–41, trans. “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language” in Ayer 1959, 60–81.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1932b, “Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft”, Erkenntnis 2, 432–465, trans. The Unity of Science, London: Kegan Paul, repr. Bristol: Thoemmies, 1996.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1932c, “Über Protokollsätze”, Erkenntnis 3, 215–228, trans. “On Protocol Sentences”, Nous 21 (1987) 457–70.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1934, Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Springer, trans. The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1937, repr. Chicago: Open Court, 2005.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1963, “Replies and Expositions”, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Chicago: Open Court, 859–1016.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1965, “A Few Words to Philipp Frank, for the Second Volume of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science”, in R.S. Cohen and M. Wartofsky (eds.), 1965, In Honor of Philipp Frank. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 2, New York: Humanities Press, pp. xi–xii.
Frank, Philipp, 1932, Das Kausalgesetz und seine Grenzen, Vienna: Springer, trans. The Law of Causality and its Limits, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.
Frank, Philipp, 1938, “Bemerkungen zu E. Cassirer, Determinusmus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik”, Theoria 4, 70–80, trans. “Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics” in Frank, Modern Science and its Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1949, 172–85.
Frank, Philipp, 1951, Relativity: A Richer Truth, London: Jonathan Cape.
Frank, Philipp (ed.), 1956, The Validation of Scientific Theories, Boston: Beacon Press (prev. published in 1954–55 in installments in Scientifi c Monthly).
Frank, Philipp, 1957, Philosophy of Science. The Link between Science and Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, repr. 2004, Mineola, NY:Dover.
Friedman, Michael, 2000, “Hempel and the Vienna Circle”, in J.H. Fetzer (ed.), Science, Explanation and Rationality, The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39–64.
Hempel, Carl Gustav, 1935, “On the Logical Positvists' Theory of Truth”, Analysis 2, 49–59, repr. in Hempel 2000, 9–20.
Hempel, Carl Gustav, 1937, “Le problème de la véritè”, Theoria 3, 206–46, trans.”The Problem of Truth” in Hempel 2000, 35–74.
Hempel, Carl Gustav, 2000, Selected Philosophical Essays (ed. by R. Jeffreys), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaila, Eino, 1930, Der logische Neupositivismus (Annales Universitatis Aboensis B XIII), Turku, trans. “Logical Positivism” in E. Kaila, Logic and Experience (ed. by R.S. Cohen), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, 1–58.
Nelson, Leonard, 1912, “Die Unmöglichkeit der Erkenntnistheorie”, Abhandlungen der Fries'schen Schule III, 4, trans. “The Impossibility of the ‘Theory of Knowledge’” in Nelson, Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. Selected Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1949, 185–205.
Neurath, Otto, 1931, “Physikalismus”, Scientia 50, 297–303, trans. “Physicalism” in Neurath 1983, 52–7.
Neurath, Otto 1932a, “Soziologie im Physikalismus”, Erkentnis 2, 393–431, trans. as “Sociology in Physicalism” in Ayer 1959, 282–319 and as “Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism” in Neurath 1983, 58–90.
Neurath, Otto, 1932b, “Protokollsätze”, Erkentnis 3, 204–14, trans. as “Protocol Sentences” in Ayer 1959, 199–208, and as “Protocol Statements” in Neurath 1983, 91–9.
Neurath, Otto, 1934, “Radikaler Physikalismus und ‘wirkliche Welt’”, Erkenntnis 4, trans. “Radical Physicalism and the “Real World’” in Neurath 1983, 100– 14.
Neurath, Otto, 1936a, “Physikalismus und Erkenntnisforschung I”, Theoria 2, 97–105, trans. “Physicalism and the Investigation of Knowledge” in Neurath 1983, 159–66.
Neurath, Otto, 1936b, “Physikalismus und Erkenntnisforschung II”, Theoria 2, 234–6, trans. “Physicalism and the Investigation of Knowledge” in Neurath 1983, 168–71.
Neurath, Otto, 1983, Philosophical Papers 1913–1946 (ed. by R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath), Dordrecht: Reidel.
Petzäll, Ake, 1931, Logistischer Positivismus. Versuch einer Darstellung und Würdigung der philosophischen Grundanschauungen des sog. Wiener Kreises der wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung (Göteborgs Högskolas Arsskrift XXXVII), Göteborg: Wettergren & Kerbers.
Petzäll, Ake, 1935, Zum Methodenproblem der Erkenntnisforschung (Göteborgs Högskolas Arsskrift XLI), Göteborg: Wettergren & Kerbers.
Petzäll, Ake, 1936, “Erwiderung [?]”, Theoria 2, 232–234, trans. “Petzäll's Reply” in Neurath 1983, 167–9.
Reichenbach, Hans, 1938, Experience and Prediction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, repr. Notre Dame: Univeristy of Notre Dame Press, 2004.
Schlick, Moritz, 1930, “Die Wende in der Philosophie”, Erkenntnis 1, 4–11, trans. “The Turning Point in Philosophy” in Ayer 1959, 53–9 and differently under the same title in Schlick 1979, 154–60.
Schlick, Moritz, 1934, “Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis”, Erkenntnis 4, 79– 99, trans. “The Foundation of Knowledge” in Ayer 1959, 209–27 and differently under the same title in Schlick 1979, 370–87.
Schlick, Moritz, 1979, Philosophical Papers vol. 2: 1925–1936 (ed. by H. Mulder and B. van de Velde-Schlick), Dordrecht: Reidel.
Uebel, Thomas, 2007, Empiricism at the Crossroads. The Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate Revisited, Chicago: Open Court.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uebel, T.E. (2010). The Nature and Status of Scientific Metatheory. The Debate between Otto Neurath and Åke Petzäll. In: Manninen, J., Stadler, F. (eds) The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3683-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3683-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3682-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3683-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)