Abstract
There is a growing literature in which it is claimed that conventional wisdom, according to which “identical quantum particles” are to be regarded either as objects violating Leibniz’s principle or – preferably from a physical point of view – not as objects at all but rather as field quanta, is incorrect. The claim is that a collection of identical quantum particles is very much like a collection of classical objects in a situation that is perfectly symmetrical (like Black’s spheres). Such classical objects do not possess individual physical properties that distinguish them, but nevertheless obey a version of Leibniz’s principle because of the irreflexive relations that hold between them; they are weakly discernible. In this paper I criticize this analogy. After explaining the notion of weak discernibility I argue that the availability of this notion does not change the interpretational status quo in quantum mechanics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Black M (1952) The identity of indiscernibles. Mind 61:153–164
Dieks D, Versteegh MAM (2008) Identical particles and weak discernibility. Found Phys 38: 923–934
Esfeld M, Lam V (2008) Moderate structural realism about space-time. Synthese 160:27–46
French S, Krause D (2006) Identity in physics: A historical, philosophical, and formal analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hawley K (2006) Weak discernibility. Analysis 66:300–303
Hawley K (2007) Identity, indiscernibility and number. Unpublished manuscript
Keränen J (2001) The Identity problem for realist structuralism. Philos Math 9:308–330
Muller FA, Saunders S (2008) Discerning fermions. Br J Philos Sci 59:499–548
Muller FA, Seevinck M (2010) Discerning elementary particles. Philos Sci, to be published
Quine WV (1976) Grades of discriminability. J Philos 73:113–116, Reprinted in Quine WV (1981) Theories and things. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Saunders S (2003) Physics and Leibniz’s principles. In: Brading K, Castellani E (eds) Symmetries in physics: Philosophical reflections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Saunders S (2006) Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 66:52–63
Schrödinger E (1952) Science and humanism. Cambridge University Press. Partly reprinted as: What is an elementary particle? In: Castellani E (ed) Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998), pp 197–210
Teller P (1998) Quantum mechanics and haecceities. In: Castellani E (ed) Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics, pp 114–141. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dieks, D. (2010). Are ‘Identical Quantum Particles’ Weakly Discernible Objects?. In: Suárez, M., Dorato, M., Rédei, M. (eds) EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3252-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3252-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3251-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3252-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)