Abstract
Karl (or “Carl,” as Reinhold himself spelled his name) Leonhard Reinhold is a philosophers’ philosopher, so to speak—not widely known outside the circle of cognoscenti except, perhaps, as a popularizer of Kant who repeatedly changed philosophical positions during his lifetime and, at one point, was the object of one of Hegel’s most scathing attacks. Such allegations are not altogether false. But neither do they reflect the true character of Reinhold as a philosopher, or his position in the German intellectual scene at the crucial time of transition from late Enlightenment to early Romantic age. As a matter of fact, the popularization of Kant had begun at the hand of the Jena theologians long before Reinhold’s publication of his first series of Kantian Letters in 1785/86 (see Hinske 1995, 231–43). Reinhold’s specific contribution to this popularization process was the arguably very constructive move of injecting the Critique of Reason into the Spinoza-dispute that Jacobi had instigated in 1785, thereby altering both the tenor of the dispute and the course that the reception of Kant’s critical work was to take. As for Hegel’s criticism of Reinhold, it must be viewed in context (see Differenzschrift, GW 4,1–92). The fact is that Hegel had held Reinhold in high esteem when a student of theology at Tübingen, and that his first exposure to Kant’s Critique had been through Reinhold’s interpretation of it (see J. Reid, in this volume).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a discussion of his activities with the student societies, see Goubet (in this volume).
References
Di Giovanni, George. 2000. “The Facts of Consciousness.” In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, edited and translated by George di Giovanni and H. S. Harris, 2–50. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.
——— 2005. Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1801. Differenz des Fichte’schen und Schelling’schen Systems der Philosophie, in Beziehung auf Reinhold’s Beyträge zur leichtern Übersicht des Zustands der Philosophie zu Anfang des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. Jena: Seider. Reprinted in GW IV:1–92. Translated into English by H. S. Harris and W. Cerf as The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy, in connection with Reinhold’s Contributions to a More Convenient Survey of the State of Philosophy at the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century. Albany: SUNY Press, 1977.
Hinske, Norbert. 1995. “Ausblick: Der Jenaer Frühkantianismus als Forschungsausgabe.” In Der Aufbruch in den Kantianismus: Der Frühkantianismus an der Universität Jena von 1785–1800 und seine Vorgeschichte, edited by Norbert Hinske, Erhard Lange and Horst Schröpfer. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt.
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. 1787. David Hume über den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismun. Ein Gespräch. Breslau. Translated into English by George di Giovanni as “David Hume on Faith, or Idealism and Realism: A Dialogue (1787).” In Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi: The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel “Allwill,” translated with an Introductory Study, Notes, and Bibliography, edited and translated by George di Giovanni, 253–338. Kingston and Montreal: McGill–Queen’s Press, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
di Giovanni, G. (2010). Karl Leonhard Reinhold and the Enlightenment: Editor’s Presentation. In: Giovanni, G. (eds) Karl Leonhard Reinhold and the Enlightenment. Studies in German Idealism, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3227-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3227-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3226-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3227-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)