Skip to main content

The Emergence of Sustainable Innovations: Key Factors and Regional Support Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter analyses the emergence of sustainable innovations in a selected number of firms and addresses key explanatory factors that contribute to emergence and diffusion of the innovations. The focus is particularly on regional support structures that facilitated the innovation processes, and on gaps between the needs identified within firms’ innovation processes and functions provided by support structures. Ten sustainable innovation processes are analysed to gain insight in the relationship between the nature of the innovation process, the type of needs for firms, and the type of functions provided in regional innovation systems. It is concluded that especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) demand articulation remains a major barrier as users are often only involved when the innovation is ready to enter the market, while regional support functions in this respect are deficient. Moreover, SMEs have major difficulty interpreting and anticipating sustainability policies and regulations at local and national levels, leading to innovations that face major regulatory barriers or are unable to cope with policy changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An important factor in the process was the formation of an EC-directive involving sharpened emission standards for MAC. A ban on HFC-134a is proposed by the EC directive for new cars by 2017, and a ban on new car models with HFC-134a by 2011, with a phasing out process before that. This implies that the prospects for alternative concepts for mobile air conditioning, such as CO2 based technology are promising.

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnick, A., Mora, D., Quiblat, N., Jiang, D., & Zheng, G. (2008). Sustainable innovation and the role of regional actors. Report prepared for the MSc of Energy and Environmental Management, Leeuwarden, CSTM-University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn, T., & Tukker, A. (Eds.). (2002). Partnership and leadership; building alliances for a sustainable future. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, N., Simpson, M., & Andronikidis, A. (2005). Knowledge diffusion in localized economies of SMEs: The role of local supporting organizations. Environment and Planning C, 23, 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation?. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstlberger, W. (2004). Regional innovation systems and sustainability, selected examples of international discussion. Technovation, 24, 749–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. L., Hofman, P. S., & Stafford, E. R. (1999). Partnerships: A path to sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(5), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. L., Hofman, P. S., & Stafford, E. R. (2002). Environmental collaboration: Potential and limits. In T. J. N. M. De Bruijn & A. Tukker (Eds.), Partnership and leadership – Building alliances for a sustainable future (pp. 21–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, R. (Ed.). (2000). Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P. S. (2000). Innovation by Negotiation – A Case Study of Innovation at The Dutch Dairy Company Borculo Domo Ingredients. CSTM series no. 145, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P. S. (2001). Innovation, negotiation and path dependencies in industry and policy – Environmental and technology policy induced innovation in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the Ninth Greening of Industry Network Conference, Bangkok, 21–25 January, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P. S. (2002). Becoming a first mover in green electricity supply: Corporate change driven by liberalisation and climate change. Greener Management International, 39, 99– 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P. S. (2005). Innovation and institutional change, the transition to a sustainable electricity system. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P. S. (2006). Scenarios for industrial transformation: Perspectives on the CondEcol case studies. ProSus Report no. 4/06, ProSus, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P. S. (2008). Governance for green electricity: Rule formation between market and hierarchy. Energy and Environment, 19, 803– 817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715– 728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IHDP. (1999). Industrial transformation science plan. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, IHDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation, towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (1997). The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruud, A., Lafferty, W. M., Marstrander, R. O., & Mosvold Larsen, O. (2007). Exploring the conditions for adapting existing techno-industrial processes to ecological premises: A summary of the CondEcol project (ProSus report 2007/1). University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2), 4–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter S. Hofman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

S. Hofman, P., de Bruijn, T. (2010). The Emergence of Sustainable Innovations: Key Factors and Regional Support Structures. In: Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J., Vazquez Brust, D. (eds) Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3159-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics