Skip to main content

Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration

Abstract

Innovation, sustainability, and collaboration are all related in their efforts to manage multiple dimensions of organizational and institutional policies and practices. This chapter provides an overview of the three topics and their relative importance to overall advancement of sustainability through innovations. Collaboration is necessary to achieve this goal and various collaborative arrangements and stakeholders in these arrangements are discussed. The chapter also introduces and discusses the various remaining chapters in this book and presents summaries, insights and linkages amongst these chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Transition theory literature emphasizes the interdependency of institutions and infrastructures defining societal systems and sub-systems, thus creating different types of lock-in that stymie innovation (path dependencies for technological and social developments such as, existing competencies, past investment, habits, regulation, social norms, dominant discourses). In particular, Transition theory argues that the stability and cohesion of societal systems is created and maintained through institutional regimes (sets of practices, rules, norms and shared assumptions that focus on system optimization rather than system innovation (Geels, 2005; Loorbach & Rootmans, 2006)

  2. 2.

    The Pathways to Sustainability framework sees sustainability as a property of non-equilibrium systems allowing the maintenance of basic systems survival functions: equity, wellbeing and environmental quality during dynamics transitions from one equilibrium state to another.

References

  • Berkhout, F. (2002). Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 12, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 825–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann, J., & Prahalad, C. K. (2007). Co-creating business’s new social compact. Harvard Business Review, 85, 80–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Wheelwright S. C. (1993). Managing new product and process development. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (2008). Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(5), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2006). Global shift: Reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, S. (2002). The principles of sustainability. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. (2005). The politics of the earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadeeva, Z. (2005). Promise of sustainability collaboration – potential fulfilled? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(2), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyvie, C., & Ager, A. (1999). NGOs and innovation: Organizational characteristics and constraints in development assistance work in The Gambia. World Development, 27, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, T. J., Reed, M. S., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Governing long-term social-ecological change: What can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovation: A coevolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Sinha, R., & Koradia, D. (2003). Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35, 975–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. L., Hofman, P. S., & Stafford, E. R. (1999). Partnerships: A path to sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(5), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogma R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport: The approach of strategic niche management. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 135–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Bloom, G., Ely, A., Nightingale, P., Scoones, I., Sha, E., et al. (2007). Understanding Governance: Pathways to sustainability (STEPS Working Paper 2). Brighton: STEPS Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limerick, D., Cunnington, B., & Crowther, F. (2002). Managing the new organization: Collaboration and sustainability in the postcorporate world. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing transitions for sustainable development. In X. Olshoorn & A. J. Wieczorek (Eds.), Understanding industrial transformation: Views from different disciplines. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2007). Collaboration as a pathway for sustainability. Sustainable Development, 15(6), 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. (2005). Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic sustainable development. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 1(2), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, R. (2008). Grass-root creativity, innovation, entrepreneurialism and poverty reduction. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poncelet, E. C. (2001). “A kiss here and a kiss there”: Conflict and collaboration in environmental partnerships. Environmental Management, 27(1), 13–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rihani, S. (2002). Complex Systems: Theory and Development Practice. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (Ed.). (2006). Greening the supply chain. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., Leach, M., Smith, A., Stagl, S., Stirling, A., & Thopson, J. (2007). Dynamics systems and the challenge of sustainability (STEPS Working Paper 1). Brighton: STEPS Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Kerkhof, M., & Wieczorek, A. (2005). Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 733–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ven De Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future, the world commission on environment and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

(The Role of the Greening of Industry Network) This book itself stands as an example of a multi-stakeholder collaborative project for the diffusion of innovations related to sustainability. The concept and raw material for this book evolved from a 2008 conference sponsored by the Greening of Industry Network (GIN) in the Netherlands.

Kurt Fischer and Johan Schot began the work of organizing the Greening of Industry Network in 1989, before its official launch at the first GIN conference in November 1991. Thus this book arrives at the 20th anniversary of the conceptualization of GIN. GIN is one of the oldest inter-disciplinary and cross-institutional (multi-stakeholder) organizations focusing on the greening and sustainability of organizations. GIN is a prime example of collaboration and innovation for sustainability. Its website (http://www.greeningofindustry.org/), defines the organization as “an international network of professionals from research, education, business, civil society organizations, and government, focusing on issues of industrial development, environment, and society, and dedicated to building a sustainable future.” Its mission statement reads “The Greening of Industry Network develops knowledge and transforms practice to accelerate progress toward a sustainable society.”

GIN is managed today by an international group of eight coordinators, including original members Kurt Fischer of The George Perkins Marsh Research Institute at Clark University, Theo de Bruijn of the Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CTSTM) at the University of Twente, and Somporn Kamolsiripichaiporn from Chulalongkorn University. Over the years GIN’s conferences have been held on different continents to accommodate the hundreds of members of the network around the world. The GIN is a vital presence in the global sustainability discourse.

This book is comprised primarily of select papers from the GIN conference held on June 26–28 in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. The main theme of the conference was “Facilitating Sustainable Innovations Sustainable Innovation as a Tool for Regional Development Innovation”. Thus, a broad focus on sustainability, technology, sustainable development, and policy guides the contents of this book. Even though regional development was the topic, many levels of analysis were represented, and the conference provided an excellent opportunity for knowledge transfer, a critical element of collaborative innovation to occur. Only the best papers that fit within the topical objectives of the book were included.

Our thanks goes not only to the coordinators of GIN, but also to Springer Publishers for their confidence and support for this project. Special thanks go to Fritz Schmuhl and Takeesha Moerland-Torpey for their important role in helping us bring this project to successful completion. Finally, of course, without the fine work of the contributors, this book will not be possible. We hope readers will find the chapters useful and insightful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Sarkis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J.J., Vazquez Brust, D.A. (2010). Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration. In: Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J., Vazquez Brust, D. (eds) Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3159-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics