Skip to main content

Postcolonial Discontent with Postmodern Philosophy of Religion

  • Chapter
Book cover Postcolonial Philosophy of Religion

If we are to have a relational view of taxonomy and discourse — the explosive myth of contextualization and positionality — then ‘sites’ should also bear out their relative differences. There are ‘in sites’ and there are ‘out sites’ (ones you see and ones you don't), and borderzones in-between. The present chapter is located in this unchar-tered borderzone, though its critique is intended to be ‘radical’ without the frothy ambiguities, equivocations, hybrid-speakages more usually than not associated with the two ‘sites’ I wish here to bring into confrontation. What are these sets of ‘sites’?

First though a brief remark on the term ‘sites’ or ‘site’ (in the singular). The Latin root ‘situ’, semantically linked to the Greek ‘topos’, denotes a fixed position where an object, structure or tissue is placed or where something occurs. In geographical and architectural usage its reference is usually to the place, space, location, setting or situatedness of a very particular or distinctive structure or tissue in an open-ended plot that also marks it off from similar ‘site’ elsewhere. If another structure is erected or imposed in that particular spot then the site is said to have been erased. There could be related parallel or deeper, invisible structures or ‘locale’, (the session next door) that remain out of sight (out of this site, i.e. in another place). In other contexts, the latter may acquire connotations of care and securedness (home, community, nation) the sacred and mythical (land, ritual altar, location of the temple as ikos), moral or ethical (‘life-world’, ‘form of life’, dharma as that which holds), surrogate or virtual (dreamspace, doughnut hole, cyberspace, web-sites), or quasi-mystical (Heidegger's ‘locale of the truth of Being’, totality, absence), cosmological (dharmakaya, infinite empty space or nothingness), even metaphysical (Omni-Presence, Void or Absolute Nothingness, sūnyatā).

After the beginning there appeared some stranger texts

West's Orientalism objectified the corpus's otherness

And Modernity's philology rendered their syntax as his own;

Thence followed the postmodern disruption of the aporia

Re-citing the alterity and the ousia of the Other's face;

But it awaited the hybrid-angst of postcolonialism's site

Whence the interrupted texts begin miming an-other meaning.

Authorless Revelation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, Aijaz. (1992). In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azmeh, Aziz. (1993). Islam and Modernities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Pamela Sue. (2004). Feminist Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. (1997). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. (2006). Fear of Small Numbers. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharucha, Rastom. (1998). Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. XXXII, No. 4, January 24–30, pp. 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, Purushottama. (1999). A Problem for (Onto-theos) Radical Pluralism. In Philosophy of Religion: Toward a Global Perspective, edited by GE Kessler, pp. 575–582. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, Purushottama, Renuka Sharma and Joseph Prabhu (eds.). (2007). Indian Ethics Classical and Contemporary. Aldershot: Ashgate; New Delhi: Oxford University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria (2007a), Dismantling normativity in Indian ethics — from Vedic altarity to the G ītā's alterity’, in Youru Wang (ed.), The Ethical Dimension And Deconstruction Normative Ethics In Asian Traditions, NY/London: Routledge, pp. 33–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria (2007b). Transglobalism of Self-Exiled Hindus: The Case of Australia. Religion Compass, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria (2008a), Dialogic Fecundation of Western Hermeneutics and Hindu Mīmām. sā in the Critical Era. In R. Sherma and A. Sharma (eds.) Hermeneutics and Hindu Thought Towards a Fusion of Horizons. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, Purushottama (2008b). Śabdapramāna: Word and Knowledge as Testimony in Indian Philosophy. New Delhi: D K Printworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosie. (1997). Nomadic Subjects: Feminist Postmodernism as Antirelativism. Justice and Democracy: Cross Cultural Perspectives, edited by Ron Bontekoe and Marietta Stepaniants. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoone, Lawrence (ed.). (1996). From Modernism to Postmodernism an Anthology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, John D. (1997). The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion Without Religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2000). Provincialzing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. New York: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2002). Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh (ed.). (2007). From the Colonial to the Postcolonial: India and Pakistan in Transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, Franz. (1990). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, Leela. (1998). Postcolonial Theory: An Introductory Text. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grange, Joseph. (1997). In Justice and Democracy: Cross Cultural Perspectives. Bontekoe, Ron and Marietta Stepaniants. (eds.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgern. (1985). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, Vinay. (1995–1996). Plural Worlds, Ashis Nandy and the Post-Columbian Future Multiple Selves. Special Edition of Emergences 7/8, Group for Composite Studies, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, Jock. (1996). Colonial Psychiatry and the African Mind. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, Ashis. (1998). Return from Exile. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. (1989). Contingency, Irony and Solidaarity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. (1995). Questions to Emmanuel Levinas, Yale French Studies, No. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt. (1992). Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Insights, Inroads and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Renuka. (1993). Understanding the Concepts of Empathy and Its Foundation in Psychoanalysis. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Meller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Renuka. (1998). The Other Revolution: Ngo and Feminist Perspectives from South East Asia in Naari Studies in Gender, Culture and Society: East; West, No. 3. Delhi: Indian Books Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Purushottama Bilimoria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bilimoria, P. (2009). Postcolonial Discontent with Postmodern Philosophy of Religion. In: Bilimoria, P., Irvine, A.B. (eds) Postcolonial Philosophy of Religion. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2538-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics