Skip to main content

Dis/Integrating Animals: Ethical Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for Human Consumption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Research at the intersections of feminism, biology and philosophy provides dynamic starting grounds for this discussion of genetic technologies and animals. With a focus on animal bodies, I examine moral implications of the genetic engineering of “domesticated” animals—primarily pigs and chickens—for the purposes of human consumption. Concepts of natural and artificial, contamination and purity, integrity and fragmentation and mind and body feature in the discussion. In this respect, Margaret Atwood’s novel, Oryx and Crake, serves as a cogent medium for exploring these highly contentious practices and ideas as it provides hypothetical narratives of possibility. Moreover, it is used to highlight contemporary hegemonic assumptions and values in ways that make them visible. Particular attention is paid to issues of growing human organs in pigs for xenotransplantation (resulting, for Atwood, in “pigoons”) and the ultimate end of the intensive factory farming of chickens through the genetic engineering of “mindless” chicken tumours (or, as Atwood calls them, “ChickieNobs”). Integral to these philosophical considerations is the provocative question of the genetic modification of animal bodies as a means to end the suffering of domestic food animals. The ultimate implications of this question include an ongoing sensory and moral deprivation of human experience, potentially resulting in a future mechanomorphosis, the extreme manifestation of an existing mechanomorphism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, S. (1996). The thread of life the story of genes and genetic engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and crake. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. & Buchanan, J. P. (Eds). (1996). Changing nature’s course: The ethical challenge of biotechnology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereano, P. (1996). Some environmental and ethical considerations of genetically engineered plants and foods. In: G. Becker & J. P. Buchanan (Eds), Changing nature’s course: The ethical challenge of biotechnology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, L. (1994). Feminism, animals and science: The naming of the shrew. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowring, F. (2003). Science, seeds and cyborgs: Biotechnology and the appropriation of life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulfield, G. (1990). Genetic manipulation of farm and laboratory animals. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cenami Spada, E. (1997). Amorphism, mechanomorphism, and anthropomorphism. In R. W. Mitchell, T. S. Thompson & H. L. Miles (Eds.). Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. (1990). Transgenic animals: Ethical and animal welfare concerns. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. (1991). Merleau-Ponty and metaphor. New Jersey: Humanities Press International Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2005) Mouse research bolsters controversial theory of aging. Scientific-American.com Retrieved May 6, 2005 from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=mouse-research-bolsters-c

  • Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan _Meets_OncoMouse ™. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2004). The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (1990). The biotic community: A philosophical critique of genetic engineering. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmayer, L. (1992). The body’s insistence on meaning: metaphor as presentation and representation in illness experience. Medical Anthropology Quarteryly, 6, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. C. Smith (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. (1990). Genetically engineered animals. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. A. (1995). Carnal boundaries: The commingling of flesh in theory and practice. In L. Birke & R. Hubbard (Eds), Reinventing biology: Respect for life and the creation of knowledge. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1988). ‘another slice from the tumour, dear?’ Meat Industry, March, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (1990). Blueprint for a humane agriculture. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (1995). The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (1998). On Telos and genetic engineering. In A. Holland & A. Johnson (Eds.). Animal biotechnology and ethics. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (1990). Pigs Will Fly. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacks, R. (1996). Sacrificed for science: are animal experiments morally defensible? In J.K. Becker & J.P. Buchanan (Eds.), Changing nature’s course: The ethical challenge of biotechnology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warkentin, T. (2002). It is not just what you say, but how you say it: An exploration of the moral dimensions of metaphor and the phenomenology of narrative, Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 7: 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (1990). Animal welfare and genetic engineering. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenz, P.S. (2001). Environmental ethics today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheale, P. & McNally, R. (Eds.), (1990). The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Leesa Fawcett for her boundless intellectual, editorial and personal generosity towards revising this chapter and well beyond. I thank Carol Gigliotti for her tireless efforts and good humour in putting together this special issue.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Traci Warkentin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warkentin, T. (2009). Dis/Integrating Animals: Ethical Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for Human Consumption. In: Gigliotti, C. (eds) Leonardo’s Choice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2479-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics