Abstract
Research at the intersections of feminism, biology and philosophy provides dynamic starting grounds for this discussion of genetic technologies and animals. With a focus on animal bodies, I examine moral implications of the genetic engineering of “domesticated” animals—primarily pigs and chickens—for the purposes of human consumption. Concepts of natural and artificial, contamination and purity, integrity and fragmentation and mind and body feature in the discussion. In this respect, Margaret Atwood’s novel, Oryx and Crake, serves as a cogent medium for exploring these highly contentious practices and ideas as it provides hypothetical narratives of possibility. Moreover, it is used to highlight contemporary hegemonic assumptions and values in ways that make them visible. Particular attention is paid to issues of growing human organs in pigs for xenotransplantation (resulting, for Atwood, in “pigoons”) and the ultimate end of the intensive factory farming of chickens through the genetic engineering of “mindless” chicken tumours (or, as Atwood calls them, “ChickieNobs”). Integral to these philosophical considerations is the provocative question of the genetic modification of animal bodies as a means to end the suffering of domestic food animals. The ultimate implications of this question include an ongoing sensory and moral deprivation of human experience, potentially resulting in a future mechanomorphosis, the extreme manifestation of an existing mechanomorphism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York: Random House.
Aldridge, S. (1996). The thread of life the story of genes and genetic engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and crake. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Ltd.
Becker, G. & Buchanan, J. P. (Eds). (1996). Changing nature’s course: The ethical challenge of biotechnology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Bereano, P. (1996). Some environmental and ethical considerations of genetically engineered plants and foods. In: G. Becker & J. P. Buchanan (Eds), Changing nature’s course: The ethical challenge of biotechnology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Birke, L. (1994). Feminism, animals and science: The naming of the shrew. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bowring, F. (2003). Science, seeds and cyborgs: Biotechnology and the appropriation of life. London: Verso.
Bulfield, G. (1990). Genetic manipulation of farm and laboratory animals. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Cenami Spada, E. (1997). Amorphism, mechanomorphism, and anthropomorphism. In R. W. Mitchell, T. S. Thompson & H. L. Miles (Eds.). Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fox, M. (1990). Transgenic animals: Ethical and animal welfare concerns. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Gill, J. (1991). Merleau-Ponty and metaphor. New Jersey: Humanities Press International Inc.
Graham, S. (2005) Mouse research bolsters controversial theory of aging. Scientific-American.com Retrieved May 6, 2005 from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=mouse-research-bolsters-c
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan _Meets_OncoMouse ™. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2004). The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge.
Holland, A. (1990). The biotic community: A philosophical critique of genetic engineering. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Kirmayer, L. (1992). The body’s insistence on meaning: metaphor as presentation and representation in illness experience. Medical Anthropology Quarteryly, 6, 323–346.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. C. Smith (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Murphy, C. (1990). Genetically engineered animals. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Newman, S. A. (1995). Carnal boundaries: The commingling of flesh in theory and practice. In L. Birke & R. Hubbard (Eds), Reinventing biology: Respect for life and the creation of knowledge. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge
Ridley, M. (1988). ‘another slice from the tumour, dear?’ Meat Industry, March, 10.
Roberts, P. (1990). Blueprint for a humane agriculture. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Rollin, B. (1995). The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rollin, B. (1998). On Telos and genetic engineering. In A. Holland & A. Johnson (Eds.). Animal biotechnology and ethics. London: Chapman and Hall.
Ryder, R. (1990). Pigs Will Fly. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Wacks, R. (1996). Sacrificed for science: are animal experiments morally defensible? In J.K. Becker & J.P. Buchanan (Eds.), Changing nature’s course: The ethical challenge of biotechnology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Warkentin, T. (2002). It is not just what you say, but how you say it: An exploration of the moral dimensions of metaphor and the phenomenology of narrative, Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 7: 241–255.
Webster, J. (1990). Animal welfare and genetic engineering. In P. Wheale & R. McNally (Eds.), The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Wenz, P.S. (2001). Environmental ethics today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wheale, P. & McNally, R. (Eds.), (1990). The bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? London: Pluto Press.
Acknowledgements
I thank Leesa Fawcett for her boundless intellectual, editorial and personal generosity towards revising this chapter and well beyond. I thank Carol Gigliotti for her tireless efforts and good humour in putting together this special issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warkentin, T. (2009). Dis/Integrating Animals: Ethical Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for Human Consumption. In: Gigliotti, C. (eds) Leonardo’s Choice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2479-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2479-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2478-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2479-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)