Abstract
Mill is famous for his clever preliminary solution to the conflict between justice and utility-maximizing. In Chapter 5 of Utilitarianism he notes that, because of declining marginal utility, one can often maximize utility by concentrating resources on the worst-off in society, thus providing a utilitarian explanation for our intuition that the worst off have special moral claims. In medical ethics, reflection on cases of persons with severe, chronic disabilities challenges this felicific, if fallacious, resolution (Mill, 1967, pp. 391–434). These persons can sometimes command enormous quantities of medical resources, but gain only marginal benefit from them. An organ transplant for someone who is worst off because she has only a short time to live would, for example, target the worst off, but produce only small benefit. Thus proposals for aggressive medical intervention to bring those with disabilities to levels of nearer normal health or restore them to that status provide a critical challenge to a theory of justice in the use of health resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burdick, J. F., Turcotte, J. G., & Veatch, R. M. (1992, October). General principles for allocating human organs and tissues. Transplantation Proceedings, 24(5), 2226–2235.
Connolly, J. K., Dyer, P. A., Martin, S., Parrott, N. R., Pearson, R. C., & Johnson, R. W. (1996, March 15). Importance of minimizing HLA-DR mismatch and cold preservation time in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation, 61(5), 709–714.
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (1996). The foundations of bioethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
In Re Jane Doe. (1991, October). A minor, civil Action File No. D-93064, Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia.
In Re The Conservatorship of Helga Wanglie. (1991, June 28). State of Minnesota, District Court, Probate Court Division, County of Hennepin, Fourth Judicial District.
In the Matter of Baby K. (1993). 832 F. Supp. 1022 (E.D. Va.).
Mill, J. S. (1967). Utilitarianism. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Ethical theories: A book of readings (pp. 391–434). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Rideout, Administrator of Estate of Rideout, et al. v. Hershey Medical Center. (1995). Dauphin County Report, pp. 472–498.
Siminoff, L. A., Burant, C., & Youngner, S. J. (2004, December). Death and organ procurement: Public beliefs and attitudes. Social Science and Medicine, 59(11), 2325–2334.
Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz. (1977). 373 Mass. 728, 370 NE 2d 417.
Takiff, H., Cook, D. J., Himaya, N. S., Mickey, M. R., & Terasaki P. I. (1988). Dominant effect of histocompatibility on ten-year kidney transplant survival. Transplantation, 45, 410–415.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1985, April 15). Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program: Final rule: 45 CFR 1340. Federal Register: Rules and Regulations, 50(72), 14878–14892.
United States Public Law. (1984, October 19, 98–507). National Organ Transplant Act 98 Stat. 2339.
Veatch, R. M. (1989, July). Allocating organs by utilitarianism is seen as favoring whites over blacks. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Newsletter, 3(3), 1,3.
Veatch, R. M. (1995, September). Resolving conflict among principles: Ranking, balancing, and specifying. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5, 199–218.
Veatch, R. M. (1997, June). Single payers and multiple lists: Must everyone get the same coverage in a universal health plan? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7(2), 153–169.
Velez v. Bethune et al. (1995). 466 S.E., 2d 627 (Ga. App.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veatch, R.M. (2009). Equal Treatment for Disabled Persons: The Case of Organ Transplantation. In: Ralston, D., Ho, J. (eds) Philosophical Reflections on Disability. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 104. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2477-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2477-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2476-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2477-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)