Skip to main content

eHealth Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The rising of a new technological era has brought within it opportunities and threats the health systems worldwide have to deal with. In such a changed scenario the role of decision-makers is crucial to identify the real and perceived needs of the population and those areas on intervention in which eHealth can help to improve the quality and efficacy of care. Therefore, in-depth analysis of the state of the art both in industrialized and in developing countries is paramount. Many in fact are constraints that mine the designing and implementation of electronic systems for health. Only if policymakers understand the real implication of eHealth and the complexities of the human being, working model could be introduced. Otherwise the systems proposed will follow the same schemes that have produced failures so far. It implies also that the mutated role of the patient had to be known, together with his expectations and needs. Nevertheless, in a globalize world, a policy for eHealth have to consider also those factors that once did not strictly belong to the health context, ecology and a greener policy being some of those. In addition, as health has to be considered a universal value, the role of the developing world is today crucial: what advantages could technology bring to those areas in which the level of industrialization is still nominal? Yet, many are the opportunities that eHealth disclose to these settings, provided that a correct approach is followed, to avoid a waste of time and resources. At least, the future of eHealth has to be considered, so that long-term plans could be developed, so that the future and still unknown challenge for health could be promptly faced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    cfr. Acta from: 2nd NIRS-ETOILE Joint Symposium 2011 on Carborlon Therapy, 25–27 November 2011; Workshop: Hadron therapy in France, Lyon 28–29 November 2011; PHE-ICRT, Geneve February 2012

  2. 2.

    In an anonymous way (forum, chat rooms) or in a public way (social networks).

  3. 3.

    The legal implications of the medical practice “sometimes impose an aseptic approach to the patient, according to the rule: the less you overdo, the less could be used against you in a legal action or in a request for compensation. Nowadays that is not a minor matter, as for instance the increasing number of free-of-charge solicitors’ advertises demonstrate, many of them explicitly pointing out the keywords “medical negligence” as a major cause of claim for compensation. It means also that some patients use to “oversee” the action of the practitioner, waiting for some weak points or possible mistakes they can use in a possible request for money.

  4. 4.

    Although it is true that in low-income countries people die because of diseases that can easly prevented and cured in industrialized countries, in the Western world people get ill and die because of pathologies that in the developing countries are not present or unknown. This is also a face of modernization that health policymakers have to deal with today.

References

  1. Khoja S, Durrani H, Nayani P, Fahim A (2012) Scope of policy issues in eHealth: results from a structured literature review. J Med Internet Res 14(1):e34. Published online 2012 February 17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1633

  2. Sittig DF, Singh H (2011) Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics 127(4). doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2184

  3. Ford EW, Menachemi N, Peterson LT, Huerta TR (2009) Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:274–281. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3042

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hysong SJ, Esquivel A, Sittig DF, Paul LA, Espadas D, Singh S, Singh H (2011) Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci 6:84 http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/84. Accessed 27 Dec 2012

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner JP (2012) Doctor-patient communication in the e-health era. Weiner Israel J Health Policy Res 1:33. http://www.ijhpr.org/content/1/1/33

  6. European Commission (2012) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. eHealth Action Plan 2012–2020—Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. COM(2012) 736 final

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blumenthal D (2012) Expecting the unexpected: health information technology and medical professionalism. In: Rothman DJ, Blumenthal D (eds) Medical professionalism in the new information age. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB (1995) Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40(7):903–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaddi A, Capello F, Gaddi P, Cevenini M, Carnevali L, Benedetto D (2012) Integrated prevention of cardiovascular disease: current and future perspective. Intern Emerg Med Suppl 57–62

    Google Scholar 

  10. Capello F (2011) A common strategy for better health. CERN Bulletin 43–44

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB (1995) Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40(7):903–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovitz L (2004) How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ 328–564

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rinaldi G, Capello F, Gaddi A (2013) Medical data, information economy and federative network. Nova Science Publisher ISBN 1622578457

    Google Scholar 

  14. SWD (2012) eHealth Action Plas 2012–2020 – innovative healthcare for the 21st century – Brussels 6.12.2012 SWD (2012) 413 final

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nartker AJ et al (2010). Increasing health worker capacity through distance learning: a comprehensive review of programmes in Tanzania. Hum Res Health 8:30

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Bank http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTSITETOOLS/0,,contentMDK:20147486~menuPK:344190~pagePK:98400~piPK:98424~theSitePK:95474,00.html

  17. Kwankam Y (2008) eHealth in developing countries: contemporary issues, challenges and opportunities for hospitals Available from: http://www.ihf-fih.org/content/download/145/909/file/56-8_YunkapKwankam.pdf

  18. Milén A (2001) What do we about capacity building? An overview of existing knowledge and good practice. WHO, June 2001 Available from: whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/a76996.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holmner A, Rocklo J, Ng N, Nilsson M (2012) Climate change and eHealth: a promising strategy for health sector mitigation and adaptation. Glob Health Action 5:18428. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v5i0.18428

  20. Saving carbon, improving health, NHS carbon reduction strategy for England (2009) http://www.sdu.nhs.uk/documents/publications/1237308334_qylG_saving_carbon,_improving_health_nhs_carbon_reducti.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2013

  21. Health in the green economy; co-benefits to health of climate change mitigation (2011) Health care facilities, Preliminary findingsinitial review. http://www.who.int/hia/hgebrief_health.pdf Accessed 2 Jan 2013

  22. Gullison RE, Frumhoff PC, Canadell JG, Field CB, Nepstad DC, Hayhoe K et al (2007) Environment. Tropical forests and climate policy. Science 316:985–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • European Commission (2012) Commission staff working document. eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020—innovative healthcare for the 21st century. SWD(2012) 413 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Commission staff working document. On the applicability of the existing EU legal framework to telemedicine services. SWD(2012) 414 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. eHealth action plan 2012–2020—Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. COM(2012) 736 final

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DG, Kuzel AJ, Feng LB, DeShazo JP, Love LE (2012) EHRs in primary care practices: benefits, challenges, and successful strategies. Am J Manag Care 18(2):e48–e54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomella LG (2011) How many clicks does it take to get to the middle of an EHR? Editorial. Can J Urol 18(5):5860

    Google Scholar 

  • Puustjärvi J, Puustjärvi L (2011) Personal health ontology: towards the interoperation of e-health tools. Int J Electron Health 6(1):62–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services 45 CFR Part 170. RIN 0991–AB58. Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology; Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 144/Wednesday, July 28, 2010/Rules and Regulations

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services. 45 CFR Part 170. RIN 0991–AB82. Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 171/Tuesday, September 4, 2012/Rules and Regulations

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng C, Appelbaum P, Hripcsak G, Kronish I, Busacca L, Davidson KW, Bigger JT (2012) Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19(5):684–687. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000878. Epub 2012 Apr 29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Capello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Capello, F., Luini, M.G.G. (2014). eHealth Policy. In: Gaddi, A., Capello, F., Manca, M. (eds) eHealth, Care and Quality of Life. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5253-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5253-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5252-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5253-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics