Skip to main content

Clinical Impact of High-Resolution Manometry and Impedance-pH Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovation in Esophageal Surgery

Abstract

High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) provides a detailed analysis of esophageal body peristalsis, upper and lower esophageal sphincter relaxations during deglutition. The novel topographic pressure representations makes HRM interpretation more intuitive and brought a new classification system of esophageal motility abnormalities. To date the most important contribution of HRM is in subclassifying achalasia, the HRM-based subclassification allows to predict outcome to therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Afkari S (2007) Measuring frequency of spontaneous swallowing. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 30:313–317

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT, Russo MW, Sandler RS (2006) The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2128–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tack J, Fass R (2004) Review article: approaches to endoscopic-negative reflux disease: part of the GERD spectrum or a unique acid-related disorder? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19(Suppl 1):28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spechler SJ, Castell DO (2001) Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut 49:145–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grubel C, Hiscock R, Hebbard G (2008) Value of spatiotemporal representation of manometric data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:525–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek M, Kahrilas PJ (2007) Impaired deglutitive OGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 293:G878–G885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE (2008) Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:627–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ (2009) Review article: high-resolution ­manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure ­topography to ­classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 21:796–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bulsiewicz WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Kwiatek MA, Ghosh SK, Meek A, Pandolfino JE (2009) Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2721–2728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis TJ, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ (2008) Achalasia: it’s not all one disease. Gastroenterology 135:1526–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shay SS, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela MF, Wise JL, Balaji NS, Zhang X, Adhami T, Murray JA, Peters JH, Castell DO (2004) Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1037–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zerbib F, des Varannes SB, Roman S, Pouderoux P, Artigue F, Chaput U, Mion F, Caillol F, Verin E, Bommelaer G, Ducrotté P, Galmiche JP, Sifrim D (2005) Normal values and day-to-day variability of 24-h ambulatory oesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a Belgian-French cohort of healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22:1011–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zentilin P, Iiritano E, Dulbecco P, Bilardi C, Savarino E, De Conca S, Parodi A, Reglioni S, Vigneri S, Savarino V (2006) Normal values of 24-h ambulatory intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean diet. Dig Liver Dis 38:226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, Tutuian R, Katz PO, Castell DO (2001) Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 120:1599–1606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hemmink GJ, Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Monkelbaan JF, Timmer R, Smout AJ (2008) Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: ‘’on’ or ‘off’ proton pump inhibitor? Am J Gastroenterol 103:2446–2453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S, Vela M, Zhang X, Sifrim D, Castell DO (2006) Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Gut 55:1398–1402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, des Varannes SB, Pouderoux P, Chaput U, Mion F, Vérin E, Galmiche JP, Sifrim D (2006) Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1956–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Becker V, Bajbouj M, Waller K, Schmid RM, Meining A (2007) Clinical trial: persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms despite standard therapy with proton pump inhibitors – a follow-up study of intraluminal-impedance guided therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26:1355–1360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. del Genio G, Tolone S, del Genio F, Rossetti G, Brusciano L, Pizza F, Fei L, del Genio A (2008) Total fundoplication controls acid and nonacid reflux: evaluation by pre- and postoperative 24-h pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance. Surg Endosc 22:2518–2523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R, Melotti G (2011) Reflux parameters as modified by laparoscopic fundoplication in 40 patients with heartburn/regurgitation persisting despite PPI therapy: a study using impedance-pH monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 56:1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Savarino E, Zentilin P, Tutuian R, Pohl D, Casa DD, Frazzoni M, Cestari R, Savarino V. The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103:2685–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radu Tutuian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hädrich, M., Tutuian, R. (2012). Clinical Impact of High-Resolution Manometry and Impedance-pH Monitoring. In: Bonavina, L. (eds) Innovation in Esophageal Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2469-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2469-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2468-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2469-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics