Skip to main content

Errors in the Interpretation of the Non-traumatic Acute Abdomen

  • Chapter
  • 2088 Accesses

Abstract

The term “acute abdomen” defines a clinical syndrome characterized by the sudden onset of severe abdominal pain requiring emergency medical or surgical treatment [1]. In a review of approximately 30,000 patients with acute abdomen, de Bombal [2] observed that the most common causes of acute abdominal pain were represented by appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, and small-bowel obstruction whereas in one third of patients no cause could be determined. Since many of these conditions may have similar early clinical presentations, diagnostic imaging tools including abdominal plain film (APF), ultrasound (US), and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) play a pivotal role in the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Silen W (1996) Cope’s early diagnosis of the acute abdomen, 19th ed. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Bombal FT (1991) Introduction. In: de Bombal FT (ed) Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain, 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for evaluating acute abdominal pain: a little more cost, a lot more information. Radiology 205:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 160:763–766

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA et al (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 168:405–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI et al (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 317:666–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD et al (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: non-enhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miki T, Ogata S, Uto M et al (2005) Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity. Radiat Med 23:242–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT et al (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: non focused appendiceal CT-review of 100 cases. Radiology 217:159–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA et al (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multidetector row CT. Radiology 235:879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zangos S, Steenburg SD, Phillips KD et al (2007) Added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Acta Radiol 14:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aufort S, Charra L, Lesnik A et al (2005) Multidetector CT of bowel obstruction: value of post-processing. Eur Radiol 15:2323–2329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS et al (2004) Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. RadioGraphics 24:703–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shin LK, Halpern D, Weston SR et al (2005) Prospective CT diagnosis of stump appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 184:62–64

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levine CD, Aizenstein O, Lehavi O, Blachar A (2005) Why we miss the diagnosis of appendicitis on abdominal CT: evaluation of imaging features of appendicitis incorrectly diagnosed on CT. Am J Roentgenol 184:855–859

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grassi R, Di Mizio R, Pinto A et al (2004) Serial plain abdominal film findings in the assessment of acute abdomen: spastic ileus, hypotonic ileus, mechanical ileus and paralytic ileus. Radiol Med 108:56–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Felzko PJ, Mezwa DG, Farah MC, White BD (1992) Clinical significance of pneumatosis of the bowel wall. RadioGraphics 12:1068–1078

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahneida AT, Melão L, Viamonte B et al (2009) Epiploic appendagitis: an entity frequentely unknown to clinicians-diagnostc imaging, pitfalls, and look-alikes. Am J Roentgenol 193:1243–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filippone, A., Cianci, R., Cotroneo, A.R. (2012). Errors in the Interpretation of the Non-traumatic Acute Abdomen. In: Romano, L., Pinto, A. (eds) Errors in Radiology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2338-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2339-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics