Skip to main content

Abstract

Several tumor-related, patient-related, and treatment-related prognostic factors have been identified for gastric cancer patients. Tumor stage, surgical radicality, tumor location, and patient age are the most important conventional prognostic variables. Extended lymphadenectomy and higher numbers of removed lymph nodes are also related to a better prognosis. The role of other factors is controversial or not generally validated. The main feature of prognostic scores is the possibility to simultaneously consider a set of potential prognostic variables and thus to assign a risk of recurrence or death to individual patients. A prognostic score was developed by the GIRCG based on a cohort of patients treated by potentially curative surgery and submitted to periodic follow-up examinations. This score can be easily included in database programs and its accuracy verified. The score has been recalculated according to the new TNM classification of gastric cancer and is currently being validated in a prospective multicenter study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Verdecchia A, Guzzinati S, Francisci S et al (2009) Survival trends in European cancer patients diagnosed from 1988 to 1999. Eur J Cancer 45:1042–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Registration Committee (2006) Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan: data analysis of nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 9:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Hahn S et al (2010) Evaluation of the Seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification. Cancer 116:5592–5598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE (2005) Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 23:7114–7124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G et al (2005) Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 241:247–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roviello F, Rossi S, Marrelli D et al (2006) Number of lymph node metastases and its prognostic significance in early gastric cancer: a multicenter Italian study. J Surg Oncol 94:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH et al (2010) Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg 251:640–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roviello F, Marrelli D, de Manzoni G et al (2003) Prospective study of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 90:1113–1119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng CT, Tsai CY, Hsu JT et al (2011) Aggressive Surgical Approach for Patients with T4 Gastric Carcinoma: Promise or Myth? Ann Surg Oncol 18:1606–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baiocchi GL, Tiberio GA, Minicozzi AM et al (2010) A multicentric Western analysis of prognostic factors in advanced, node-negative gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg 252:70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glehen O, Gilly FN, Arvieux C et al (2010) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study of 159 patients treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2370–2377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM et al (2010) Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3173–3180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kattan MW, Karpeh MS, Mazumdar M et al (2003) Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3647–3650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Novotny AR, Schuhmacher C, Busch R et al (2006) Predicting individual survival after gastric cancer resection: validation of a U.S.-derived nomogram at a single high-volume center in Europe. Ann Surg 243:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Inomata M et al (2000) Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type. Cancer 89:1418–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marrelli D, Roviello F, de Manzoni G et al (2002) Different patterns of recurrence in gastric cancer depending on Lauren’s histological type: longitudinal study. World J Surg 26:1160–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Takagawa R et al (2008) Tumor diameter as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1959–1967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nozoe T, Iguchi T, Egashira A (2010) Pathological prognostic score as a simple criterion to predict outcome in gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 102:73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kooby DA, Suriawinata A, Klimstra DS et al (2003) Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer. Ann Surg 237:828–835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Santoro R, Carboni F, Lepiane P et al (2007) Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young European adults. Br J Surg 2007 94:737–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Refaie WB, Tseng JF, Gay G et al (2008) The impact of ethnicity on the presentation and prognosis of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Results from the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 113:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Corso G et al (2009) Different pathological features and prognosis in gastric cancer patients coming from high-risk and low-risk areas of Italy. Ann Surg 250:43–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimada H, Takiguchi N, Kainuma O et al (2010) High preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 13:170–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM et al (2010) Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:439–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Neri A et al (2007) Complications after extended (D2) and superextended (D3) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: analysis of potential risk factors. Ann Surg Oncol 14:25–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verlato G, Roviello F, Marchet A et al (2009) Indexes of surgical quality in gastric cancer surgery: experience of an Italian network. Ann Surg Oncol 16:594–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A et al (2007) The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 245:543–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pedrazzani C, Sivins A, Ancans G et al (2010) Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) may have low clinical utility in gastric cancer patients treated by limited lymphadenectomy: results from a single-center experience of 526 patients. World J Surg 34:85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pacelli F, Rosa F, Marrelli D et al (2011) Do perioperative blood transfusions influence prognosis of gastric cancer patients? Analysis of 927 patients and interactions with splenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1615–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hundahl SA, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EK et al (2007) Improved regional control and survival with “low Maruyama Index” surgery in gastric cancer: autopsy findings from the Dutch D1-D2 Trial. Gastric Cancer 10:84–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marrelli, D., Caruso, S., Roviello, F. (2012). Prognostic Factors and Score Systems in Gastric Cancer. In: de Manzoni, G., Roviello, F., Siquini, W. (eds) Surgery in the Multimodal Management of Gastric Cancer. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2318-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2318-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2317-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2318-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics