Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

La colonscopia virtuale pp 43–53Cite as

Preparazione del paziente e altri aspetti pratici

  • Chapter

  • 405 Accesses

Estratto

La preparazione del paziente per effettuare un esame di colonscopia virtuale (CV) è estremamente semplice, poiché non è necessaria alcuna pre-medicazione né sedazione e l’unico farmaco che viene in genere somministrato è un agente spasmolitico. È richiesto solo il digiuno il giorno dello studio, nel caso in cui si dovesse iniettare per via endovenosa un mezzo di contrasto (mdc); ma questa non è la regola, dal momento che l’uso dell’mdc è limitato solo ad alcune situazioni cliniche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   79.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Chen SC, Lu D, Hecht JR et al (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR 172:595–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al (1999) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yee J, Kumar N, Hung R et al (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fletcher JG, Johnosn CD, Maccarty RL et al (2000) CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem solving technique. AJR 172:1271–1278

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenlon HM (2002) CT colonography: pitfalls and interpretation. Abdom. Imaging. 27:284–291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using 3D CT colonography with 2D imaging correlation. AJR 176:137–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rockey DC, Paulson EK, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paulson EK, Foster WL, Thompson WM et al (2004) Causes of errors in CT Colonography (CTC) and air contrast barium enema (ACBE) in detection of colonic lesions 1 cm or larger (abstr.). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, p. 618

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al (2003) Optimizing colonic distension for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of Hyoscine hydrobromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dachman AH (2006) Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology 239:317–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blakeborough A, Sheridan MB, Chapman AH (1997) Retention balloon catheters and barium enemas: attitudes, current practice and relatively safety in the UK. Clin Radiol 52:62–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR (2005) Adenomatous polyp obscured by small calibre rectal catheter at low dose CT Colonography: a rare diagnostic pitfall. AJR 184:1581–1583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Skovgaard N, Sloth C, Von Benzon E et al (1995) The role of carbon dioxide and atmospheric air in double-contrast barium enema. Abdom Imaging 20:436–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR 184:786–792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Macari M (2004) Techniques for CT Colonography. In: 5th International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy Course handbook, Boston pp. 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morrin M, Farrel R, Keogan M et al (2002) CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intarvenous glucagons. Eur Radiol 12:525–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubesin S, Levine MS, Laufer I et al (2000) Double contrast barium enema examination technique. Radiology 215:642–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography: AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1491–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grant DS, Bartram CI, Heron CW (1986) A preliminary study of the possible benefits using carbon dioxide insufflation during double contrast barium enema. Br. J Radiol. 59:190–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Church J, Delaney C (2003) Randomized controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:322–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levene G, Kaufman S (1975) Improved technique for double contrast examination of the colon by use of compressed carbon dioxide. Radiology 68:83

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yee J, Galdino G, Kumar N et al (2002) Comparison of colonic distention using electronic CO2 insufflation and manual atmospheric insufflation on CT Colonography (abstr.). In: RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook Ill

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S et al (2006) Automated colonic insufflation for multi-detector row CT colonography: distention and patient experience in comparison to manual carbon dioxide insufflation. AJR. 186:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Hein PA et al (2004) Pressure controlled colonic insufflation for CT Colonography (abstr.). In: RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook Ill p. 432

    Google Scholar 

  25. Iafrate F, Laghi A, Paolantonio P et al (2004) Colonic distention using mechanical CO2 insufflator versus manual air distention (abstr.). In: RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook Ill p. 432

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim SY, Park SH, Choi EK et al (2008) Automated carbon dioxide insufflation for CT Colonography: effectiveness of colonic distention in cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing. AJR., March 1190(3):698–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A et al (2006) Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 239(2):464–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M et al (2006) Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 239(2):457–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamar M, Portnoy O, Bar-Dayan A et al (2004) Actual colonic perforation in virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1242–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coady-Fariborzian L, Angel LP, Procaccino JA (2004) Perforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1247–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goei R, Nix M, Kessels AH et al (1995) Use of antispasmodic drugs in double contrast barium enema examination: glucagons or buscopan? Clin Radiol 50:553–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bova JG, Jurdi RA, Bennett WF (1993) antispasmodic drugs to reduce discomfort and colonic spasm during barium enemas: comparison of oral hyoscyamine, i.v. glucagone and no drug. AJR 161:965–968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruzzi JF, Moss AC, Brennan DD et al (2003) Efficacy of IV buscopan as muscle relaxant in CT Colonography. Eur Radiol 13:2264–2270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA et al (1999) The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR 173(1):169–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Ruckert J et al (2005) Spasmolysis at CT Colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236(1):184–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2005) Virtual Colonoscopy. Ed. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tytgat GN (2007) Hyoscine butylbromide: a review of its use in the treatment of abdominal cramping and pain. Drugs 67(9):1343–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Eisenhofer G, Rivers G, Rosas AL et al (2007) Adverse drug reactions in patients with phaeochromocytoma: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 30(11):1031–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere S et al (2007) European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): Consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) for the American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group, the US Multi-Society Task Force, and the American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin Mar 5

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB et al (2003) Colorectal neoplasms: role of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Radiology 228(1):152–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal BJ et al (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material on CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Park SH, Lee SS, Choi EK et al (2007) Flat colorectal neoplasms: definition, importance, and visualization on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:953–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fletcher JG, Johnosn CD, Krueger WR et al (2002) Contrast enhanced CT colonography in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: feasibility of simultaneous evaluation for metastatic disease, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia in colorectal carcinoma. AJR 178:283–290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M et al (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast enhanced multi detector row CT colonography-initial experience. Radiology 231:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L et al (2002) Colorectalcancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223:615–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:799-805

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C et al (2006) Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 239:149–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA et al (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 14(5):768–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma I Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma

    Dott. Franco Iafrate

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma I Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Polo Pontino ICOT Latina, Italia

    Dott. Andrea Stagnitti & Prof. Andrea Laghi

Authors
  1. Dott. Franco Iafrate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dott. Andrea Stagnitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Andrea Laghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iafrate, F., Stagnitti, A., Laghi, A. (2008). Preparazione del paziente e altri aspetti pratici. In: La colonscopia virtuale. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1066-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1067-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation