Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Psicologia clinica pp 203–215Cite as

La valutazione della produzione scientifica in psicologia clinica: impact factor e prospettive integrative

  • Chapter

  • 980 Accesses

Estratto

All’interno della psicologia clinica, come in molte discipline del sapere, risulta attuale il dibattito sulla valutazione della produttività scientifica.Tale interesse si è imposto sia per motivi pragmatici, tra i quali il principale è certamente l’accresciuta competizione per l’accesso alle risorse ed ai finanziamenti per la ricerca, che per motivi scientifico-epistemologici, in relazione alla definizione di criteri valutativi per la scienza in generale e per le singole discipline in particolare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Asai I (1981) Adjusted age distribution and its application to impact factor and immediacy index. J Am Soc Inform Sci 32:172–174

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baddeley A (2001) So where should we publish? Cortex 37:598–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breno E, Fava GA, Guardabasso V et al (2002) La ricerca scientifica nelle università italiane. Una prima analisi delle citazioni della banca dati ISI

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calza L, Garbisa S (1995) Italian professorships. Nature 374–492

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coelho P M, Antunes C M, Costa H M et al (2003) The use and misuse of the “impact factor” as a parameter for evaluation of scientific publication quality: a proposal to rationalize its application. Braz J Med Biol Res 36:1605–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colucci FP (2004) All’universo noto e in altri loci ancor: riflessioni dissonanti sull’internazionalizzazione della ricerca in psicologia. Giornale italiano di psicologia 1:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  7. D’Odorico L (2001) The citation Impact Factor in developmental psychology. Cortex 37:578–579

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A (2005) The “impact factor” revisited. Biomed Digit Libr 27

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fava GA, Ottolini F (2000) Impact Factor versus actual citations. Psychother Psychosom 69:285–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fava GA, Breno E, Guardabasso V, Stefanelli M (2002) Encouraging academic competition in Europe. Science 298:1715–1716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fava GA, Masserini C (2002) Efficacia delle psicoterapie nel servizio pubblico. Il contributo della ricerca valutativa alla clinica

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fava GA, Guidia J, Sonino N (2004) How citation analysis can monitor the progress of research in clinical medicine. Psychother Psychosom 73:331–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fava GA (2005) Impact Factor. Gioia e dolore della comunità scientifica. Potenzialità e limiti. Ricerca & Pratica 21:148–150

    Google Scholar 

  14. Figà Talamanca A (2002) The “impact factor” in the evaluation of research. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 44:2–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Figà Talamanca A (2004a) Ancora sull’ Impact Factor. Università Notizie XXIV:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Figà Talamanca A (2004b) L’Impact Factor. Università Notizie XXIV:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Figà Talamanca A (2004c) L’Impact Factor nella valutazione della ricerca. Università Notizie XXIV:16–18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garfield E (1998a) The impact factor and its proper application. Unfallchirurg 101:413–414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garfield E (1998b) The impact factor and its rightful use. Anaesthesist 47:439–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Garfield E (1999) Journal impact factor: a brief review. Cmaj 161:979–980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garfield E (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295:90–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glänzel W, Schoepflin U (1995) A bibliometric study on aging and reception. Rocesses of scientific literature. J Inform Sci 21:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haller U, Hepp H, Reinold E (1997) Does the “impact factor” kill the German language?. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 37:117–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirst G (1978) Discipline impact factor: a method for determining core journal lists. J Am Soc Inform Sci 29:171–172

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hofbauer R, Frass M, Gmeiner B et al (2002) Euro-Factor-The new european scientific currency. VICER Publishing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huth EJ (2001) Authors, editors, policy makers, and the impact factor. Croat Med J 42:14–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurmis AP (2003) Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2449–2454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laudanna A (1995) Problemi di valutazione della ricerca in Psicologia. Giornale Italiano di psicologia 229–24

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laudanna A (1996) Proposte per la valutazione della ricerca in Psicologia. Giornale Italiano di psicologia 239–26

    Google Scholar 

  30. Laudanna A, Miceli M, Welin AC (2001) La valutazione della produzione scientifica: criteri e proposte dell’Istituto di Psicologia del CNR. Giornale italiano di psicologia 611–632

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leff D (2005) Making an impact: the rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal quality. J Am Diet Assoc 105:29–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Levorato MC, Marchetto E (2003) Il giudizio degli psicologi italiani sulle riviste nazionali e internazionali. Giornale italiano di psicologia 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  33. Littner Y, Mimouni FB, Dollberg S et al (2005) Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159:1036–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maffulli N (1995) More on citation analysis. Nature 378–760

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pudovkin AI, Garfield E (2004). Rank-normalized Impact Factor: a way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Paper presented at the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, Providence Rhode Island

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ramos-Rincon JM, Gutierrez-Rodero F (2003) Evaluation of in the impact factor of journals included in the Infectious Diseases category of the Journal Citation Report (1991–2001). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 21:388–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rey-Rocha J, Martin-Sempere MJ, Martinez-Frias J et al (2001) Some misuses of Journal Impact Factor in research evaluation. Cortex 37:595–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rousseau R (2005) Median and percentile impact factors: a set of new indicators. Scientometrics 63:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA (2003) Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 91:42–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. SCI http://www.isinet.com/products/citation/sci

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sculier JP (2004) Good and bad uses of the Impact Factor, a bibliometric tool. Revue Medicale De Bruxelles 25:51–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314:498–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sevinc A (2004) Manipulating impact factor: an unethical issue or an Editor’s choice? Swiss Med Wkly 134:410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Premkamolnetr N (2004) A modified method for calculating the Impact Factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer Science Category in 1997-2001. Scientometrics 60:217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Soualmia LF, Darmoni SJ, Le Duff F et al (2002) Web impact factor: a bibliometric criterion applied to medical informatics societies’ web sites. Stud Health Technol Inform 90:178–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Taubes G (1993) Measure for measure in science. Science 260:884–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thomson Scientific (2005) Journal Performance Indicators. Retrieved November 14, 2005, from http://scientific.thomson.com/products/jpi/

    Google Scholar 

  48. Umiltà C (2003) Editoriale. Giornale italiano di psicologia 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  49. Umiltà C, Tagliabue M (2004) Trent’anni di ricerca psicologica in Italia. Giornale italiano di psicologia 1:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vakil N (2005) The journal impact factor: judging a book by its cover. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2436–2437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Vallar G (2004) Il ruolo del fattore d’impatto nella valutazione della produzione scientifica. Giornale italiano di psicologia 1:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  52. van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF (2002) Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics 53:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. VICER http://www.vicer.org/

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vinkler P (1986) Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics 10:157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facoltà di Psicologia, UniversitàCattolica Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano

    Gianluca Castelnuovo (Ricercatore di Psicologia Clinica)

Authors
  1. Gianluca Castelnuovo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrico Molinari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Castelnuovo, G., Molinari, E. (2007). La valutazione della produzione scientifica in psicologia clinica: impact factor e prospettive integrative. In: Psicologia clinica. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0554-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation