Skip to main content

P2P and Planetary Futures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter presents peer-to-peer theory and practice in the context of alter-globalization and planetary perspective on change. It begins through a short elicitation on peer-to-peer theory. It then synthesizes a dialogic engagement between peer-to-peer (P2P) theory and nine perspectives on planetary change: reform liberalism, post-development, relocalization, cosmopolitanism, neo-Marxism, engaged ecumenism, meta-industrial, autonomism/horizontalism, and co-evolutionary perspectives. The chapter then presents a synopsis of a ground breaking effort in the application of P2P theory, the Free Libre Open Knowledge (FLOK) project in Ecuador, which provides a concrete example of P2P as an alter-globalization practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: http://p2pfoundation.net/From_the_Crisis_of_Capitalism_to_the_Emergence_of_Peer_to_Peer_Political_Ecologies.

  2. 2.

    A good example of this is the institutional structure of Occupy Wall Street’s General Assembly, which along with its Working and Operating Groups also has institute ‘Caucuses’, which are specific circles for minorities and oppressed ‘majorities’, who have certain privileges to block measures that would have discriminatory effects. These types of solutions need to be generalized within commons-oriented peer production.

References

  • Applebaum, P., & Robinson, W. (Eds.). (2005). Critical globalisation studies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, M., & Kostakis, V. (2014). From the Communism of Capital to Capital for the Commons: Towards an Open Co-operativism. tripleC. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(1), 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, J. (2000). Religious movements and globalisation. In R. Cohen & S. Rai (Ed.), Global social movements (pp. 165–183). London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, D., & Conisbee, M. (Ed.). (2003). Return to Scale: Alternatives to Globalisation. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Mass: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, J., & Mander, J. (2003). Alternatives to economic globalisation. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C. (1999). Globalization: A world systems perspective. Journal of World Systems Research, 2(Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., & Gills, B. (2005). Waves of globalization and resistance in the capitalist world system: Social movements and critical global studies. In P. Applebaum & W. I. Robinson (Ed.), Critical globalisation studies (pp. 45–54). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1977). Steady state economics. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H., & Cobb, J., Jr. (1994). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautney, H. (2010). Protest and Organization in the alternative globalization era. NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2003). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E. (1988). The great U-Turn. New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Holling, C.S. (Ed.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, S. (2002). Wild politics. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, P. (2004). Cosmopolitanism and the need for transnational criminal justice: The case of the international criminal court. Theoria (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, C. (2002). Localization: A global manifesto. UK: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, B. M. (1983, April). The Future of futurism. The Futurist (pp. 52–58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, C. (2003). In the footsteps of Gandhi: Conversations with spiritual social activists. Berkley, California: Parallax Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungk, R., & Galtung, J. (Eds.). (1969). Mankind 2000. Oslo, London: International Peace Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society: An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1996). Pop internationalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2005). Cosmocracy and global civil society. In D. Chandler & G. Baker (Ed.), Global civil society: Contested futures (pp. 149–170). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakis, V., & Bauwens, M. (2014). Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (2001). Macroshift: Navigating the transformation to a sustainable world. Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubeck, P. (2000). The islamic revival. In R. Cohen & S. Rai (Ed.), Global social movements (pp. 146–164). London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, J., & Goldsmith, E. (1996). The case against the global economy. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, J., & Tauli-Corpuz, V. (Ed.). (2005). Paradigm Wars: Indigenous Peoples’ Resistance to Economic Globalisation San Francisco International Forum on Globalization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. (2002). The origins of the modern world: A global and ecological narrative. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R., & Foster, J. B. (Eds.). (2004). Pox Americana: Exposing the American Empire. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, A. (2000). Democracy beyond borders? In D. Held & A. McGrew (Ed.), The global transformations reader: An introduction to the globalization debate (pp. 405–419). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milojevic, I. (2000). Globalisation, gender and world futures. Paper presented at the new futures: Transformations in Education, culture and technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, J. (2004). What is critical globalisation studies? International Studies Perspectives, 5, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P. (2006). World lines: Pathways, Pivots, and the global future. Boston Tellus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R., et al. (2002). Great transition: The promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponniah, T. (2006). The world social forum vision. Worcester: Clark University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, I. (2004). A theory of global capitalism. London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. I. (2005). What is critical globalization studies? Intellectual labor and global society. In P. Applebaum & W. I. Robinson (Ed.), Critical globalisation studies (pp. 11–18). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, K. (1996). Principles of bioregionalism. In J. Mander & E. Goldsmith (Ed.), The case against the global economy (pp. 471–484). San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (2009). Ecological debt: Embodied debt. In A. Salleh (Ed.), Eco-sufficiency and global justice: Women write political ecology. Pluto/Spinifex: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2006). The rise of the global left: The world social forum and beyond. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Z., Nandy, A., Wyn-Davies, M., & Alvares, C. (1993). The blinded eye: 500 years of Christopher Columbus. Goa, India: The Other India Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, J. (2003). The unconquerable world. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroyer, T. (Ed.). (1997). A world that works. New York: The Bootstrap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2000a). Stolen harvest: The hijacking of the global food supply. Cambridge: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2000b). Tomorrow’s biodiversity. New York: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, A. (2003). Return to scale. In D. Boyle & M. Conisbee (Ed.), Return to scale: Alternatives to globalisation (pp. 1–12). London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (2002). Globalisation: Capitalism and its alternatives (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros, G. (1998). The crisis of global capitalism. Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., et al. (2008). Global democracy and the world social forums. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalisation and its discontents. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spratt, D., & Sutton, P. (2008). Climate code red. Melbourne: Scribe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. (2009). Globalisms: The great ideological struggle of the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tormey, S. (2005). From utopias of place to utopian spaces: Reflections on the contemporary radical imaginary and the social forum process. Ephemera 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1983). Historical capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, M. (2009). Policy and the measure of women. In A. Salleh (Ed.), Eco-sufficiency and global justice: Women write political ecology. Pluto/Spinifex: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (2003). A People’s history of the United States. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Ramos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramos, J., Bauwens, M., Kostakis, V. (2016). P2P and Planetary Futures. In: Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures . Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3635-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3637-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics