Abstract
While the previous chapters explored various livelihood opportunities and responses adopted by forest peripheral communities, in this chapter, the authors closely examine emerging alternatives in urbanising landscapes. For communities in forest peripheries who find their traditional livelihoods threatened by conservation policies and development projects, ecotourism has been an appealing livelihood strategy. This chapter explores how adoption of this potential opportunity by the peri-urban communities is often pre-empted by several factors. In the case of those communities living close to natural and cultural heritage and also simultaneously peripheral to growing urban regions, ecotourism becomes all the more attractive, given the vast demand from the urban populace. However, inherent conservation bias and corporate mode of operation of most ecotourism initiatives leave many among the peripheral communities untouched by the benefits of urbanisation while getting deprived of their traditional livelihoods. Based on interviews with a sample of potential tourists, this chapter examines the scope and feasibility of ecotourism ventures in three sites that lie on the peripheries of urban and natural landscapes. The results throw light on the attitudes of potential tourists about linking leisure travel with socioecological causes and on the challenges that such an adaptive livelihood venture potentially face.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From where local youth approached us for an assessment.
- 2.
Purushothaman et al. (2007) discuss policies and institutions to monitor social and ecological sustainability of ecotourism enterprises in India. It reviews prominent ecotourism models in Kerala, Karnataka, Sikkim and Darjeeling and elicits a set of user-friendly criteria for assessing impacts in terms of eco-cultural footprint, community involvement and equity.
- 3.
All monetary figures in the chapter are for the year 2007.
- 4.
All monetary values are for the financial year 2007–2008, when the survey was conducted.
References
Beavers, J. (1995). Community based ecotourism in the Maya Forest: Six case studies from communities in Mexico, Guatemala/Belize. Unpublished Report, The Nature Conservancy-USAID/MAYAFOR Project.
Doria, C. R., Rosendo, C., & Sergio, F. D. (2003). Community-based ecotourism in the Pedras Negras and Curralinho extractive reserves, Guapore River Valley. Lyonia, 4(1), 35–42.
Edwards, V. M. (2004). The commons in an age of global transition: Challenges, risks and opportunities. The 10th Biennial Meeting of the IASCP Oaxaca, Mexico, p. 30.
Epler, W. (1996, May 18–23). The evolution of ecotourism as a sustainable development tool. Paper presented at the sixth international symposium on society and natural resource management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Hadker, N., Sharma, S., David, A., & Muraleedharan, T. R. (1997). Willingness to pay for Borivali National Park: Evidence from a contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 21, 105–122.
Herrera, J. (2006). Lessons from the Equator Initiative: The Casa Matsiguenka community-based ecotourism lodge enterprise in Manu National Park. Peru: University of Manitoba.
Lee, C.-K., & Mjelde, J. W. (2007). Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: The Case of the Korean DMZ. Ecological Economics, 63, 511–520.
Lindsey, P. A., Alexander, R. R., du Toit, J. T., & Mills, M. G. L. (2005). The potential contribution to ecotourism to African wild dog Lycaon pictus conservation in South Africa. Biological Conservation, 123, 339–348.
Mowforth, M., & Munt, I. (1998). Tourism and sustainability: New tourism in the third world. London/New York: Routledge.
Odero, K. K., & Huchu, P. (1998). Community-based ecotourism venture: The case of Sunungukai Camp, Zimbabwe. Washington DC: The World Bank/WBI’s CBNRM Initiative.
Purushothaman, S., Jojo, T. D., & Patil, S. (2007). Ecotourism policy: A framework for India. In G. Radha Krishna (Ed.), Tourism: Perspectives and issues (pp. 51–78). Hyderabad: ICFAI Press.
World Tourism Organisation. (2000). Sustainable development of tourism: A compilation of good practices. Madrid: WTO.
WWF-International. (2001). Guidelines for community based ecotourism development. Gland: WWF-International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gupta, P., Purushothaman, S., Issac, B., Mao, A. (2013). Community-Driven Ecotourism Near Bangalore: Adapting to Change. In: Purushothaman, S., Abraham, R. (eds) Livelihood Strategies in Southern India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1626-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1626-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1625-4
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1626-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)