Skip to main content

Integrating Geographic Information into Scenic Assessments of Middle Landscapes

  • Chapter
Landscape Ecology in Asian Cultures

Part of the book series: Ecological Research Monographs ((ECOLOGICAL))

Abstract

Suburban areas, or middle landscapes, can serve as ideal human habitat, and demonstrate how human–environmental synergy can be sustained. However, without extensive evaluation and management, the development of the middle landscape may be haphazard and can lead to awkward assimilation into the city. This study assessed the physical and aesthetic attributes of the catchment basin of a Japanese river and the value of the middle landscape within it. A digital surface model of the catchment area was created using aerial photographs, which were classified according to land use. Panoramic video images were taken both upstream and downstream from all the bridges along the main stretch of the river. View-shed areas within the frame of each of the panorama images were generated for 3-D individual land-use areas. Forty-one college students evaluated and rated the images using the scenic beauty estimation procedure to standardize the perceptual assessment data thus obtained. Three types of middle landscape were identified by factor analysis and cluster analysis: (1) a perspective of distant mountains and forests with anthropogenic structures in the foreground (mountain/forest type); (2) a view consisting of rice paddy fields, farmland, natural areas and/or vacant land (country/nature type); (3) a view of a water surface with commercial facilities (developed waterfront type). The findings indicated that the visibility of middle landscapes, and particularly the perspective of distant mountains and forests, has a positive impact on the view from the river, even if it has conspicuous anthropogenic structures in the foreground. Conversely, the combination of commercial facilities with water tends to be rated relatively low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown TC, Daniel TC (1990) Scaling of ratings: concepts and methods. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-293, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC (2001) Wither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 66:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx (1964) The machine in the garden: technology and the pastoral ideal in America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JF (2004) Using metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landsc Urban Plan 69:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell AT, Lamb RJ (1998) Preference and naturalness: an ecological approach. Landsc Urban Plan 42:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer EL, Mietz J (1970) It seems possible to quantify scenic beauty in photographs. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-162, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara O (1982) Doboku Keikan Keikaku (Landscape planning in civil engineering). Gihodo Shuppan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C (1990) Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: the loop road in Acadia National Park, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 19:213–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y-F (1998) Escapism. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita S (2002) Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: use of photo-projective method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment. Landsc Urban Plan 62:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu K (1995) Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts. Landsc Urban Plan 32:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sampei Yamashita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yamashita, S. (2011). Integrating Geographic Information into Scenic Assessments of Middle Landscapes. In: Hong, SK., Kim, JE., Wu, J., Nakagoshi, N. (eds) Landscape Ecology in Asian Cultures. Ecological Research Monographs. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-87799-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics