Skip to main content

Service Ecosystems Innovation in Systemic Perspective: Transitions and Coevolutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 6))

Abstract

Service ecosystems refer to such complex service systems that are self-adjusting systems of resource-integrating actors, connected by shared institutional logics and mutual value creation through service exchange with an emphasis on dynamic features like adaptation, viability, and sustainability. In this chapter, focusing especially on social innovation, we first analyze service ecosystems by adopting Panarchy and Transition Management Theory in a systemic perspective. Panarchy is a framework for analyzing ecosystems developed to account for the dual, often conflicting, characteristics of all complex systems, i.e., stability and change. Transition Management Theory has attracted attention as a framework to study the governance of social systems for sustainability. Based on the analysis, we identify adaptive transitions, phase transitions, and coevolution in service ecosystems innovation and derive a Systemic Innovation Model of Service Ecosystem. It describes dynamic behavior of service ecosystems innovation in a comprehensive way. Finally, we illustrate our model by applying it to the paradigmatic changes concerning the nature of the public sector.

An earlier version of this chapter was partly published as Goda K. and Kjima K., Modeling Service Ecosystems Innovation, Journal of Business and Management Science, 2015, 3(3), pp. 85–91.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (2013). Discontinuities in ecosystems and other complex systems. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benington, J., & Hartley, J. (2001). Pilots, paradigms and paradoxes: Changes in public sector governance and management in the UK, International research symposium on public ….

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossink, B. (2002). The development of co-innovation strategies: Stages and interaction patterns in interfirm innovation. R&D Management, 32(4), 1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2010). Open services innovation. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2013). Open business models. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond the high-tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djalante, R., & Djalante, S. (2012). Transition management, new mode of governance for sustainable development. Natural Hazards, 62(3), 1339–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). Technical change and economic theory. Open Publisher: Burns & Oates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E. (2014). Panarchy. pp. 1–5. Available at: http://books.google.co.jp/books/about/Discontinuities_in_Ecosystems_and_Other.html?

  • Fuller, R. B. (1975). Synergetics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4/5), 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., et al. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage strategic Management. Journal of Strategic Management, 31, 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money Management, 25(1), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C., Gunderson, L.H., & Ludwig, D. (2014). In search of a theory of adaptive change. In panarchy understanding transformations in human and natural systems. pp. 1–3. Available at: http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/panarchy

  • Hoyrup, S. (2010). Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: Basic concepts, approaches and themes. European Review of Labour and Research, 16, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(2007), 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. Washington, D.C: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management. Utrecht: International Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Määttä, H., Ruutu, S., & Toivonen, M. (2014). Revealing the complexities of health care renewal: A system dynamics approach. In Proceedings of the th International conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE, Krakow, Poland – July. pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., et al. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (1993). Services in the new industrial economy. Futures, 25(6), 653–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panth, S. (2013). Technological innovation, industrial evolution, and economic growth. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, F. (2013). Innovation processes in business networks. Wiesbaden: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York/London: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (2006). Encyclopedia of nonlinear science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, F. (2008). The micro-macro link in social simulation. Sociologica, II(1). doi: 10.2383/26578

  • Sundbo, J. (2008). Customer-based innovation of knowledge e-services – the importance of after-innovation. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 9(3–4), 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). User-based innovation in services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, M. (2013, September). Starting points for the comparison of SDL and neo-Schumpeterian views on innovation. Proceedings of 1st workshop on service innovation research, 18–20, Catanzaro, Italy. pp. 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation. Change and meaning in the age of the internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Cambridge & IBM (2008). Succeeding through service innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. (2014). Insights on innovation from an institutional and ecosystem perspective. Presented at 24th annual international RESER conference, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, H., et al. (2012). Toward a service (Eco)systems perspective on value creation. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 3(3), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoichi Kijima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kijima, K., Toivonen, M., Ruutu, S. (2016). Service Ecosystems Innovation in Systemic Perspective: Transitions and Coevolutions. In: Toivonen, M. (eds) Service Innovation. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 6. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54922-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics