Skip to main content

Zooming Out and Zooming In: Service Ecosystems as Venues for Collaborative Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Service Innovation

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 6))

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide a perspective that extends the process of innovation beyond firm activities and new product development. We apply an S-D logic, service ecosystems framework to reframe the context of innovation to include collaboration and social structures (i.e., institutions and institutional arrangements) that guide and are guided by the actions and interactions among multiple actors. Using this framework, we show that market innovation does not automatically occur when actors (e.g., firms) or groups of actors (e.g., innovation networks) introduce new ideas or products, but instead when new practices become institutionalized as solutions. Institutionalization, in this context, is a nonlinear process in which systemic actors engage in institutional work and cocreate institutions through multiple iterations of institutional developments until common templates emerge that reflect imperfectly shared conceptions of problems and solutions. More specifically, we argue that technological innovation can be viewed as the cocreation of new value propositions. Market innovation, on the other hand, is driven by and drives the development of new technologies but also requires the acceptance of value propositions as well as the continued exchange, interpretation, integration, and application of a particular technology among multiple actors, over time (i.e., institutionalization).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior: A functionalist theory of marketing. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, L., & Spring, M. (2006). Services, products, and the institutional structure of production. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 797–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1981). The political economy of marketing systems: Reviving the institutional approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 1(2), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Boston: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (Ed.). (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. J., Devinney, T. M., Dowling, G. R., & John, G. (1999). Understanding institutional designs within marketing value systems. The Journal of Marketing, 63, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantin, J., & Lusch, R. F. (1994). Understanding resource management. Oxford: The Planning Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., & Miles, I. (2000). Innovation, measurement and services: The new problematique. Economics of Science Technology and Innovation, 18, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, W. E. D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (Ed.). (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Tronvoll, B., McHugh, P., & Windahl, C. (2014). Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6), 897–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourville, J. T. (2005). The curse of innovation: A theory of why innovative new products fail in the marketplace. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1997). Pdma research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), 429–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (Eds.). (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Kjellberg, H. (2010). Segmenting a market in the making: Industrial market segmentation as construction. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, C., & Tolbert, P. S. (2008). Organizational institutionalism and sociology: A reflection. In The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 473–490). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A. (2010). Megamarketing: The creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C. F. (2006). Multiple versions of markets: Multiplicity and performativity in market practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 839–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2007). On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2006). Institutions and institutional work. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, C., Pels, J., & Storbacka, K. (2014). A holistic market conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K., & Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of strategic nets – new modes of value creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking of the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37(5), 461–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H. J., Muniz, A. M., Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (2002). Capturing markets from the economists. Cultural Economy, pp. 59–77.. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value cocreation and service systems (Re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004, January). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 61–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic; Further evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing, 36(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2b … and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2013). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Ischia: Naples Forum on Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, A., Penaloza, L., & Firat, F. (Eds.). (2006). The market as a sign system and the logic of the market. Armonk/New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation network – by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). Toward a service (Eco)systems perspective on value creation. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 3(3), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., & McKnight, B. (Eds.). (2009). Building the iron cage: Institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiko Wieland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wieland, H., Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A. (2016). Zooming Out and Zooming In: Service Ecosystems as Venues for Collaborative Innovation. In: Toivonen, M. (eds) Service Innovation. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 6. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54922-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics