Abstract
Chapter 5 explained the relevance between the initial idea of expected utility theory and psychology and introduced some studies of utility measurement based on expected utility theory. This chapter will first explain the axiomatic system of expected utility theory, then how to approach the axiomatic system, with introduction of some counterexamples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulates et axiomes de l’ ecole Americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.
Barberà, S., Hammond, P. J., & Seidl, C. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of utility theory, vol. 1: Principles. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 9–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, W. (Ed.). (1992). Utility theories: Measurement and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axiom. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.
Fishburn, P. C. (1988). Nonlinear preference and utility theory. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
Ichikawa, A. (1983). Ishiketteiron: Enjiniaringu saiensu kouza33 [Decision-making theory: Engineering science course 33]. Tokyo: Kyoritsu Publishing.
Iverson, G., & Luce, R. D. (1998). The representational measurement approach to problems. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Measurement, judgment, and decision making (pp. 1–79). San Diego: Academic.
Jensen, N. E. (1967). An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory. I. Utility functions. Swedish Journal of Economics, 69, 163–183.
Savage, I. R. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
Schultz, D. (1981). A history of modern psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Academic [Murata, K. (Trans.). (1986). Gendai shinrigaku no rekishi. Tokyo: Baifukan].
Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts savage’s axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368–373.
Takemura, K. (1996). Ishikettei to sono shien [Decision-making and support for decision-making]. In S. Ichikawa (Ed.), Ninchi shinrigaku 4kan shikou [Cognitive psychology vol. 4 thoughts] (pp. 81–105). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Tamura, H., Nakamura, Y., & Fujita, S. (1997). Koyo bunseki no suri to oyo [Mathematical principles and application of utility analysis]. Tokyo: Corona Publishing.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944/1947). Theory and games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takemura, K. (2014). Axioms and Counterexamples Expected Utility Theory. In: Behavioral Decision Theory. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54580-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54580-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54579-8
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54580-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)