Skip to main content

Extensive Surveys of Chimpanzee Stone Tools: From the Telescope to the Magnifying Glass

  • Chapter
The Chimpanzees of Bossou and Nimba

Part of the book series: Primatology Monographs

Abstract

Surveys are procedures used to find and evaluate sites that may contain remnants of material cultures. The surface survey, a detailed prospection through field walking, is one of the essential techniques, indispensable when research is to begin in any unstudied environment. However, with few exceptions, surveys have not been extended to tropical rainforests. Since 2006, archeological surveys have been done in Bossou and Diécké forests at sites used by nonhuman primates with concentrations of stone tools currently in use to crack nuts. This work required the combination of direct and indirect methods for investigating individual behavior and, to explore, with reference to early hominins, issues of diversity and regionalism and the emergence of culture. Archeology examines temporal and spatial variables with accuracy comparable to that of a telescope, whereas this etho-archeological approach functions here like a magnifying glass. I was able to record the objects without interfering with the tool-users and to collect data on several sequences that are repeated over time. Archeological methods and equipment need to take in consideration two variables: (1) areas of activity to be recorded are still in use, that is, not abandoned; (2) tool-users may enter the site during data collection. Here we report the results concerning the spatial analyses of monitored nut-cracking sites and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of this interdisciplinary approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailey G (2007) Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. J Anthropol Archaeol 26:198–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey RC, Head G, Jenike M, Owen B, Retchman R, Zechenter E (1989) Hunting and gathering in tropical rain forest: is it possible? Am Anthropol 91:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banning EB (2002) Archaeological survey. Manuals in archaeological method, theory, and technique. Kluwer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C, Boesch H (1984b) Mental map in wild chimpanzees: an analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking. Primates 25:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bown TM, Kraus M (1993) Soils, time, and primate paleoenvironments. Evol Anthropol 2:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho S, Sousa C, Matsuzawa T (2007) New nut-cracking sites in Diecké Forest, Guinea: an overview of the surveys. Pan Africa News 14:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho S, Cunha E, Sousa C, Matsuzawa T (2008) Chaînes opératoires and resource exploitation strategies in chimpanzee nut-cracking (Pan troglodytes). J Hum Evol 55:148–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delagnes A, Roche H (2005) Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: the case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. J Hum Evol 48:435–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac GL (1986) Foundation stones: early artefacts as indicators of activities and abilities. In: Bailey GN, Callow P (eds) Stone age prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 221–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson D, Edgar B (1996) From Lucy to language. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DL (2002) Darwin would be proud: bioturbation, dynamic denudation, and the power of theory in science. Geoarcheology 17:7–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joulian F (1996) Comparing chimpanzee and early hominid techniques: some contributions to cultural and cognitive questions. In: Mellars P, Gibson K (eds) Modelling the early human mind. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge, pp 173–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl H, Maisels F, Ancrenaz M, Williamson EA (2008) Best practice guidelines for surveys and monitoring of great ape populations. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant LF, McGrew WC (2005) Percussive technology: chimpanzee baobab smashing and the evolutionary modelling of hominin knapping. In: Roux V, Bril B (eds) Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behavior. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp 341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Bateson P (2007) Measuring behavior: an introductory guide, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew WC (1992) Chimpanzee material culture: implications for human evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew WC (2004) The cultured chimpanzee: reflections on cultural primatology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercader J (ed) (2003) Under the canopy. The archaeology of tropical rain forests. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercader J, Panger M, Boesch C (2002) Excavation of a chimpanzee stone tool site in the African rainforest. Science 296:1452–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercader J, Barton H, Gillespie J, Harris J, Kuhn S, Tyler R, Boesch C (2007) 4,300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panger MA, Brooks AS, Richmond BG, Wood B (2002) Older than the Oldowan? Rethinking the emergence of hominin tool use. Evol Anthropol 11:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew C, Bahn P (1998) Arqueología, Teorías, métodos y práctica. 2ª edicíon. Ediciones Akal, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskam S (2001) Excavation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakura O, Matsuzawa T (1991) Flexibility of wild chimpanzee nut-cracking behavior using stone hammers and anvils: an experimental analysis. Ethology 87:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer MB (1985) Is there a “Pompeii premise” in archaeology? J Anthropol Archaeol 41:18–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter T (2006) Geological atlas of Africa: with notes on stratigraphy, tectonics, economic geology, geohazards and geosites of each country. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Semaw S, Rogers MJ, Quade J, Renne PR, Butler RF, Dominguez-Rodrigo M, Stout D, Hart WS, Pickering T, Simpson SW (2003) 2.6-Million-year-old stone tools and associated bones from OGS-6 and OGS-7, Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. J Hum Evol 45:169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sept JM (1992) Was there no place like home? A new perspective on early hominid archeological sites from the mapping of chimpanzees nests. Curr Anthropol 33:187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier JP (2000) À propos des processus de formation des sites préhistoriques. Paleo 12:379–385

    Google Scholar 

  • White TD, Suwa G, Asfaw B (1995) Ardipithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia. Nature 375:88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson TJ (2006). The archaeology of landscae. In: Bintliff J (ed) A companion to archaeology. Blackwell, London, pp 334–356

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JB (1985) Geology and mineral resources of West Africa. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn T, McGrew WC (1989) An ape’s view of the Oldowan. Man 24:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Direction National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, République de Guinée, and Dr. Kourouma Makan, Director of the Institut de Recherche Environnementale de Bossou for permission to conduct field work at Diécké. I would also like to thank Dr. Papa Cecé Condé from the Centre Forestier de N’Zérékoré, Prof. Tetsuro Matsuzawa and Dr. Werner Grimmelman (Progerfor) for support and materials. The research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan: MEXT-16002001, JSPS-HOPE, JSPS-21COE-Kyoto-Biodiversity, and F-06-61 of the Ministry of Environment, Japan, to Tetsuro Matsuzawa. S.C. was supported by Municipality of Leiria, Portugal; Cambridge European Trust (RIB 00107), FCT-Portugal (SFRH/BD/36169/2007), Research Centre for Anthropology and Health (CIAS – University of Coimbra), The Wenner-Gren Foundation, Queens College Cambridge, and the Leakey Trust (UK). I am grateful to B. Zogbila, H. Gbéregbé, J. Doré, P. Goumy, M. Doré, C. Goumy, J.M. Kolié, J. Malamu, L. Tokpa, A. Kbokmo, C. Koti, and O. Mamy for field support. I am also grateful to C. Sousa for guidance during the beginning of the 2006 research; to L. Pinela (GIS configuration and training); and to P. Gonçalves for unconditional support. I thank P. Kelmendi and V. Carvalho for fruitful discussions and S. Koski, T. Humle, and W.C. McGrew for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carvalho, S. (2011). Extensive Surveys of Chimpanzee Stone Tools: From the Telescope to the Magnifying Glass. In: Matsuzawa, T., Humle, T., Sugiyama, Y. (eds) The Chimpanzees of Bossou and Nimba. Primatology Monographs. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53921-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics