Skip to main content

Environmental Sound Perception in Patients with Cochlear Implants Compared with That in Patients with Auditory Nerve Diseases (Auditory Neuropathy) and Cortical Deafness

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The mechanism for perception of environmental sounds is considered to be different from the cognitive mechanism of language. The environmental sound perception of cochlear implantees appears to be good but not perfect. However, its underlying mechanism is not yet known. The aim of this study was to investigate perception of environmental sounds in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants compared with that in patients with central auditory disorders. Seventeen postlingual patients with cochlear implants, 6 patients with auditory nerve disease (auditory neuropathy), and 10 patients with cortical deafness were selected for the comparison. A tape-recorded environmental sound perception test of 24 environmental sounds, which was developed by the authors in 1987, was used. This test is divided into two categories: the category of vocalization includes human voice as well as animal and bird sounds, and the category of non-voice sounds includes sounds of nature and musical instruments, as well as sounds from man-made sources. The test procedure consists of two steps. The fi rst step (open set) is only to listen and to identify each sound either orally or in writing. The second step (closed set) is to listen and chooses a picture card matching test form among four different pictures. The percentages of correctly identifi ed environmental sounds in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants was markedly higher than that in patients with cortical deafness, but was similar to that in patients with auditory nerve disease (auditory neuropathy), in both the closed and open sets. Our study revealed that the perception of environmental sounds in postlingual patients with cochlear implants was not good in the open set but markedly better in the closed set. This result is similar to those for auditory nerve disease patients but completely different from those for cortical deafness patients. The ability of patients with cochlear implants to perceive environmental sounds is similar to that of patients with auditory nerve disease, perhaps because information carried by the cochlear nerve is similarly degraded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kaga K, Nakamura M, Shinogami M, et al (1996) Auditory nerve disease of both ears revealed by auditory brainstem responses, electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 25:233–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Star A, Picton PW, Sininger Y, et al (1996) Auditory neuropathy. Brain 119:741–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Starr A, Sininger Y, Nguyen T, et al (2006) Cochlear receptor (microphonic and summating potentials, otoacoustic emissions) and auditory pathway (auditory brain stem potentials) activity in auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 22:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butinar D, Zidar J, Leonardis L, et al (1999) Hereditary auditory, vestibular, motor and sensory neuropathy in a Slovenian Roma (Gypsy) kindred. Ann Neurol 46:36–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheykholeslami K, Kaga K, Kaga M (2001) An isolated and sporadic auditory neuropathy (auditory nerve disease): report of five patients. J Laryngol Otol 115:530–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyamoto RT, Kirk KI, Renshaw J, et al (1999) Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy. Laryngoscope 109:181–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaga K, Shindo M, Tanaka Y (1997) Central auditory information processing in patients with bilateral auditory cortex lesions. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 532:77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaga, K., Akamatsu, Y. (2009). Environmental Sound Perception in Patients with Cochlear Implants Compared with That in Patients with Auditory Nerve Diseases (Auditory Neuropathy) and Cortical Deafness. In: Kaga, K., Starr, A. (eds) Neuropathies of the Auditory and Vestibular Eighth Cranial Nerves. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09433-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09433-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-09432-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-09433-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics